首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2022-06-18
39
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to the passage, "Scribbler50" believes that _____.
选项
A、people drinking in the bar do not care about others’ smoking
B、people drinking in the bar hope to ban smoking
C、people walk into the bar without knowing others’ smoking there
D、people smoking in the bar do not worry about drinking
答案
A
解析
由第2段倒数第二句的反问可知,他认为人们并没有意识到二手烟的危害,所以才会到充斥着二手烟的地方去。这些地方自然也包括酒吧这类场所,所以可推出A“在酒吧里喝酒的人不在乎其他人吸烟”正确。B“在酒吧喝酒的人希望能禁娴”、C“人们走进一个酒吧,并不知道其他人在吸烟”和D“在酒吧吸烟的人不担心喝酒”,文中均无提及。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IHuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
BicyclemessengershaveexistedforahundredyearsinNewYork,and______numberreachedapeakinthe1990s.
Lookatthefoursquares,A,B,C,andD,whichindicatewherethefollowingsentencecouldbeaddedtothepassage.Wherewould
Whenchanginglanes,adrivershouldusetheturnsignaltoletotherdriversknow______.
_____hasalwaysfascinatedbiologists.
Whydoesthestudenttalktohisadviser?
Whydoesthestudentgotoseethedirector?Choose2answers.Howdoesthestudentfeelabouttalkingtothedean?
MEXICANMURALART(1)ThefirstmajormodernartmovementinLatinAmericawasMexicanmuralism,whichfeaturedlarge-scale
WearesoberlyawarethatChinaremainstheworld’slargestdevelopingcountry,withalargepopulation,weakeconomicfoundatio
Itmaysoundcooltopullanall-nighter,butactually,you’rewastingyourtimeasitpreventsyourbrainandbodyfromfunctio
BiotechCropsBiotechcropsbringhigheryieldswithsolidenvironmentalbenefits:lessuseofenergy,bettersoilconservat
随机试题
维C银翘片中含有的西药成分包括()。
小青龙汤中主要起温肺化饮作用的药物是()
暴发型肝炎指
持有会计从业资格证书的人员,离开会计工作岗位超过()个月的,应当填写注册登记表,并持会计从业资格证书,向原注册登记的会计从业资格管理机构备案。
如果要在中国艺术里寻找一种雅俗交融的代表,那么戏曲应该是_______的。在中国戏曲漫长的发生、发展过程中,始终存在着“雅”和“俗”的一种良性_______,它们共同_______了中国戏曲的文化品格。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是:
人生不可能是尽善尽美的,我们也很难找到一朵花是完美无缺的。虽然人体总的来说是左右对称的,可是这种对称远远不是完全的。每个人左右手的粗细不一样,一只眼睛比另一只眼睛更大或更圆。两个耳垂的形状也不同。最明显的,就是每个人只有一个心脏,通常都在靠左的位置。
中国共产党十七大报告指出,以邓小平为首的党的第二代中央领导集体坚持解放思想、实事求是,以巨大的政治勇气和理论勇气为中国特色社会主义事业做出的伟大贡献是
HowlonghasthespeakerbeeninFinland?
SENSITIZATION:ALLERGIC::
Duringparties,thespeakerusedto
最新回复
(
0
)