首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the
admin
2015-09-26
77
问题
In recent years criticisms have been voiced concerning sexist bias in the English language. It has been argued that some of the vocabulary and grammar we use reflects and reinforces a traditional view of the world as one in which men are dominant and women play a secondary role.
Take the word "chairman", for example. While this can in fact apply to people of both sexes, it appears to some people to be male-oriented as it ends in "man". In the past people taking the role of chairman were exclusively male, and the word was obviously originally a compound of "chair" and "man". Many English speakers, however, have ceased to view this word as a compound and no more feel it to be composed of two units, "chair" and "man", than they perceive "cupboard" as composed of "cup" and "board". In addition the continued use of chairman might be defended on the grounds that the final syllable is pronounced /m’n/ rather than / m
n/, just like the final syllable of woman. Despite such considerations other speakers take a contrary view and are sensitive to the components of which it is made up. They clearly perceive it as a title which perpetuates traditional ideas about the place of women in society. For this reason they seek to replace it with neutral terms such as "chairperson" or "chair" , so that it is now possible to ask questions such as: "Who is chair of the committee?"
Other changes advocated include the replacement of words such as "postman", "fireman" and "policeman" with more clearly neutral terms such as "postal worker", "fire-fighter" and "police officer". There is, however, continuing controversy about how far such language changes should go. Should changes also be considered to traditional idioms such as "man in the street" and titles such as "Peking Man"? What about those words where the male meaning of "man" is no longer dominant, such as "manhandle"?
To the extent that changes have taken place, they have done so more in the written language and formal pronouncements than in everyday speech. You would be quite likely to read in the paper that "Postal workers are to receive a pay increase". But "Has the postman been?" would be most likely to be heard in informal conversation. Here "postman" remains firmly entrenched in popular usage.
The lack of a sex-neutral third-person singular in English has also attracted attention. How, for example, do we fill in the blank in the following sentence? "A good teacher always makes sure is well prepared for the lesson. " Traditionally, this would be filled in with "he". The male pronoun in such cases is clearly intended to refer to both sexes. It is still widely used in this way, but some people, especially women, dislike it. They may prefer to add the female pronoun to the male, as in "A good teacher always makes sure he or she is well prepared for the lesson". Some people, however, feel that this looks and sounds awkward. Another solution is to use the plural "they" for the singular; "A good teacher always makes sure they are well prepared for the lesson. " This is often heard in conversation, but is less frequent in formal written English. More cautious souls can avoid the problem altogether by rephrasing in the plural: "Good teachers always make sure they are well prepared for the lesson. "
The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes and behaviors is a matter of conjecture. Chinese, Japanese, Persian and Turkish do not make the kinds of sex distinctions English makes through its system of pronouns, but it would be difficult to maintain that males who speak these languages are less sexist than males who speak English!
To what extent does the language reflect and shape attitudes and behaviors?
选项
A、They are closely related.
B、It is a matter of conjecture.
C、They have nothing to do with each other.
D、Only in English are they closely related.
答案
B
解析
细节题。从文章最后一段首句The extent to which language reflects and shapes attitudes andbehaviors is a matter of conjecture.可以看出,语言在某种程度上反映和塑造讲话者的态度和举止只是一种推测,所以[B]是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/IYXK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
Whydoadultsbelievethatalcoholicawarenessprogramsteachyoungpeoplenottooverdrink?Recently,readinganarticleabout
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
InrecentyearscriticismshavebeenvoicedconcerningsexistbiasintheEnglishlanguage.Ithasbeenarguedthatsomeofthe
Shewasteachingme______youwouldteachayoungerchildtospeakthelanguage.
Mybrother’splansarevery______;hewantstomasterEnglish,FrenchandSpanishbeforeheissixteen.
随机试题
患儿,女,1岁,生后3个月起青紫渐加重,活动后气急,查体:生长发育明显落后,口唇、鼻尖、耳垂、指/趾青紫明显,伴杵状指(趾),胸骨左缘闻及Ⅲ级收缩期杂音,肺动脉第二音减弱。诊断为法洛四联症。该患儿应该采取的体位是
腹腔镜胆囊切除术的适应证是
奶牛,6岁,产犊后3周出现食欲减退,精神沉郁、凝视。呼出气体及尿液有烂苹果味,体温37.5℃,产奶量下降,迅速消瘦。血液学检查最可能降低的指标是
关于当事人能力与当事人适格的概念,下列哪些表述是正确的?(2012年卷三第81题)
银行的表内外资产可分为()。
某企业2009年2月1日收到银行的委托收款通知,如该企业对收款人委托收取的款项需要拒绝付款的应当在()内出具拒绝证明。
现有课程表(课程号,课程名,学分,开课学期,课程性质),课程号为主码。该表数据量较大。设经常要对该表执行类似下面的查询:SELECT*FROM课程表WHERE课程名=’数据库原理’为提高这类查询的执行效率,下列物理设计方案中,正确且最为合
Itiswhatyoudoratherthanwhatyousay______matters.
To:belindacarlos@onestar.comFrom:lloyd@topnet.comSubject:MovieSchedule;Attachment:MovieScheduie.docHiBelinda,Howis
Arewereadyforthelibraryofthefuture?A)Librarianstodaywilltellyoutheirjobisnotsomuchtotakecareofbooks
最新回复
(
0
)