A、It has produced desired effects. B、It has more advantages than disadvantages. C、It helps promote competition. D、It has created

admin2006-01-14  51

问题  
China and India have roughly the same population, but when it comes to mobile phones, there is no comparison between the two. In India, seven years after the launch of mobile-phone services, there are only 10 million users. In China, half that number signs up as new subscribers every month.
    Geography and culture explain some of the differences. The concentration of economic activity in China’s eastern coastal region gave its mobile operators big economies of scale, allowing lower prices. In China, telephones quickly came to be regarded as fashion items, something that has only recently happened to India.
    But the main difference is regulation. India chose a licensing policy that divided the country into 22 regions, each with two licenses to operate mobile networks. Bidding in multiple regions was restricted. This aimed to promote competition, but led to a fragmented market with a baffling array of operators, none of which has economies of scale. Limited spectrum also hurt service quality.

选项 A、It has produced desired effects.
B、It has more advantages than disadvantages.
C、It helps promote competition.
D、It has created a negative impact in the market.

答案D

解析 关于印度对移动电话的管理规定,原文第三段作了详细说明。文章首先介绍了印度的做法,然后在第三句说明其结果“...but led to a fragmented market with a baffling array of operators...”从句手中表示贬义的单词 (fragmented支离破碎的,baffling受挫的)可猜测,文中对印度这种做法并不看好,因此,选项d是正确的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JF0O777K
0

最新回复(0)