首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug. If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as
admin
2012-04-23
59
问题
The FDA may rescind its approval of Avastin, a colon-cancer drug.
If the summer of 2009 was the season of "death panels," as the debate over health-care reform exploded, this is the season of "17.5k dead women a year. " That’s the body count scaremongers are predicting if the Food and Drug Administration rescinds its provisional approval of the drug Avastin for metastatic breast cancer, a decision expected by year’s end. Although the move has nothing to do with the new health-care law, uncertainty about "Obama-care" has given opponents an opening to terrify people about what’s coming—like bureaucrats rationing health care to save money.
The reality is far different and, for those who care more about helping cancer patients than about scoring political points, much sadder. That’s because in 2008, when the FDA gave "fast track" approval for Avastin in breast cancer that has metastasized—usually to the lungs, bones, liver, or brain—it was conditional on the manufacturer, Genentech, running additional clinical trials of the drug’s safety and efficacy. There was good reason for that. Avastin is an angiogenesis inhibitor, a class of cancer drugs that have not lived up to their hype: although they stop one mechanism by which malignant cells grow blood vessels to sustain them, the cells often activate a different mechanism and go on proliferating.
Although Avastin does extend the lives of patients with metastatic colorectal and kidney cancer, and remains FDA-approved for those uses, the new studies show it does not work the same miracle against metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Instead, Avastin increased what’s called progression-free survival (how long before cancer spreads or grows) by about one to three weeks, depending on which chemo agent it was paired with. But it did not keep women alive any longer than chemo alone. To some advocates, progression-free survival without an increase in overall survival is still welcome, since it suggests patients have a better quality of life during their last months.
But it’s hard to make that case for Avastin. Not only did it not keep women alive, but it also caused hypertension, hemorrhaging, bowel perforations, and other side effects. "It seems as if the drug’s toxicity cancels out any benefit," cancer surgeon David Gorski of the Karmanos Cancer Institute told me. Perforated bowels do not equal a better quality of life.
These dismal results are what led an FDA panel to vote 12—1 in July to rescind the conditional approval of Avastin for MBC. Critics of health-care reform, predictably, saw nefarious motives—in particular, evidence that Obamacare will ration expensive drugs. (Avastin costs some $88,000 a year, though few patients live that long. ) The Wall Street Journal editorialized about the "Avastin mugging," and Sen. David Vitter accused the FDA of "assigning a value to a day of a person’s life. "
If Avastin did extend lives for, let’s say, $10,000 a day, Vitter might have a case. But it doesn’t extend life at all. That makes allegations like the 17,500 dead women (from a right-wing blog) "utter demagoguery of the most vile and despicable sort," Gorski wrote on the blog Science-Based Medicine.
There are stories galore of women with metastatic breast cancer who are alive "because of Avastin. " Indeed, patients have been flooding the airwaves and blogosphere with claims that Avastin helped them. But the only way to tell whether Avastin deserves the credit for keeping patients alive is through large studies. "There are always patients who live longer than average," biostatistician Donald Berry of the MD? Anderson Cancer Center told me. "They attribute it to the treatment; people love to make attributions. " But when the proportion of patients alive at any given time in a study is the same whether they are receiving Avastin or not—as the two large trials found—then crediting Avastin is "very likely wrong. " That some women did live longer on Avastin, Berry explained, "may simply reflect the natural heterogeneity of the disease and say nothing about the therapy. "
Doctors can keep prescribing Avastin for metastatic breast cancer off-label, though insurers will not pay for it. Some activists welcome that. There is "no evidence of clinical benefit from Avastin, yet there is harm," says Fran Visco, president of the National Breast Cancer Coalition. "We need to demand more of treatment before we unleash it on the public. " Science-based medicine isn’t always pretty. But it’s better than politics-based medicine, which is what some critics of the Avastin decision are practicing—and much better than deluding ourselves into thinking something works when it doesn’t.
The best title of the passage is______.
选项
A、It’s not about rationing
B、Why the FDA may reverse course on Avastin
C、A value to a day of a person’s life
D、Avastin, a controversial medicine
答案
B
解析
该题为归纳推断题。文章记述了美国食品与药品管理局撤销使用阿瓦斯丁治疗晚期乳腺癌的批准。所以最好的标题是B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/JGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Ascollegeseniorshurtleintothejobhunt,littlefibsontheresume--forexample,claimingsdegreewhenthey’rethreecredit
20世纪,人类取得了巨大的成就,其中科学技术的进步也许是最大的成就。展望21世纪,科学技术的迅速发展和高科技产业的兴起,将推动世界经济继续由农业经济向工业经济、进而向知识经济嬗变。世界正在发生深刻的变化:经济与科学技术的结合与日俱增;世界经济的重组加快步伐
Britain’seastmidlandswereoncethepictureofEnglishcountryside,alivewithflocks,shepherds,skylarksandbuttercupsthe
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
Becausemarketsareoftenunpredictable,successfulmarketingisratherlikehittingamovingtarget.Consumertastesvarydepen
______wasNOTwrittenbyHemingway.
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
然而,或是因为中国人与其他人太不一样,或是因为他们工作起来很有耐心,他们能成功地把表面看来毫无价值的开采地(miningclaim)变为有利可图的东西,这使他们成为爱嫉妒的竞争者们的眼中钉。他们受到了多种形式的骚扰。经常阻止他们在开采地上开矿;一些地区甚
A、hedidn’twanttoapprovetheresignationofEducationMinister.B、theresignedofficialswantedtheopportunitytoprovethei
WhenLewisZiskawantedtoseehowawarmerwoodwithmorecarbondioxideintheairwouldaffectcertainplants,hedidn’tset
随机试题
女性,25岁,平时月经规则,3个月前妇科检查有小肌瘤,现停经2月余,阴道流血10天。妇科检查子宫如妊娠14周大,软,轻压痛,双侧附件区触及5cm囊性包块,壁薄活动好,无压痛。血hCG增高明显。最合适的治疗是
我国北方钩端螺旋体病的主要传染源是
在商业银行流动资金贷款的贷前调查报告中,借款人的财务状况不包括()。
在向管理询问可能影响财务报表的期后事项时,下列事项中不相关的是()。
听证程序不适用()行政处罚案件。
某跑步团的3位队员A、B、C在一环形湿地公园晨跑,三人同时从同一地点出发,A、B按逆时针方向奔跑,C按顺时针方向奔跑。A、B两人晨跑速度之比为16:13,且他俩的速度(以米/分计)均为整数并能被5整除,其中B的速度小于70米/分,C在出发20分钟后与A相遇
我国公民对国家管理活动享有的诉愿权有()。
社会保险是公民社会经济权利的重要内容,包含多个方面的内容,下列选项属于社会保险范畴的有
下列叙述中正确的是()。
Accordingtotheconversation,whatisoneproblemwitharmexercises?
最新回复
(
0
)