首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy [A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, some
admin
2020-11-04
44
问题
The Amazon-Walmart Showdown That Explains the Modern Economy
[A] With Amazon buying the high-end grocery chain Whole Foods, something retail analysts have known for years is now apparent to everyone: The online retailer is on a collision course with Walmart to try to be the predominant seller of pretty much everything you buy. Each one is trying to become more like the other—Walmart by investing heavily in its technology, Amazon by opening physical bookstores and now buying physical supermarkets. But this is more than a battle between two business titans. Their rivalry sheds light on the shifting economics of nearly every major industry.
[B] That in turn has been a boon(福音)for consumers but also has more worrying implications for jobs, wages and inequality. To understand this epic shift, you can look not just to the grocery business, but also to my closet, and to another retail acquisition announced Friday morning.
[C] Men’s dress clothing, mine included, can be a little boring. Like many male office workers, I lean toward clothes that are sharp but not at all showy. Nearly every weekday, I wear a dress shirt that is either light blue, white or has some subtle check pattern, usually paired with slacks and a blazer. The description alone could make a person doze. I used to buy my dress shirts from a Hong Kong tailor. They fit perfectly, but ordering required an awkward meeting with a visiting salesman in a hotel suite. They took six weeks to arrive, and they cost around $ 120 each, which adds up fast when you need to buy eight or 10 a year to keep up with wear and tear(破损). Then several years ago I realized that a company called Bonobos was making shirts that fit me nearly as well, that were often sold three for $ 220, or $ 73 each, and that would arrive in two days.
[D] Bonobos became my main shirt provider, at least until recently, when I learned that Amazon was trying to get into the upper-end men’s shirt game. The firm’s " Buttoned Down" line, offered to Amazon Prime customers, uses high-quality fabric and is a good value at $ 40 for basic shirts. I bought a few: they don’t fit me quite as well as the Bonobos, but I do prefer the stitching(针脚). I’m on the fence as to which company will provide my next shirt order, and a new deal this week makes it interesting: Walmart is buying Bonobos. Walmart’s move might seem a strange decision. It is not a retailer people typically turn to for $ 88 summer weight shirts in Ruby Wynwood Plaid or $ 750 Italian wool suits. Then again, Amazon is best known as a reseller of goods made by others.
[E] Walmart and Amazon have had their sights on each other for years, each aiming to be the dominant seller of goods—however consumers of the future want to buy them. It increasingly looks like that " however" is a hybrid of physical stores and online-ordering channels, and each company is coming at the goal from a different starting point.
[F] Amazon is the dominant player in online sales, and is particularly strong among affluent consumers in major cities. It is now experimenting with physical bookstores and groceries as it looks to broaden its reach. Walmart has thousands of stores that sell hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of goods. It is particularly strong in suburban and rural areas and among low- and middle-income consumers, but it’s playing catch-up with online sales and affluent urbanites.
[G] Why are these two mega-retailers both trying to sell me shirts? The short answer is because they both want to sell everything. More specifically, Bonobos is known as an innovator in exactly this type of hybrid of online and physical store sales. Its website and online customer service are excellent, and it operates stores in major cities where you can try on garments and order items to be shipped directly. Because all the actual inventory is centralized, the stores themselves can occupy minimal square footage. So the acquisition may help Walmart build expertise in the very areas where it is trying to gain on Amazon. You can look at the Amazon acquisition of Whole Foods through the same lens. The grocery business has a whole different set of challenges from the types of goods that Amazon has specialized in: you can’t store a steak or a banana the way you do books or toys. And people want to be able to make purchases and take them home on the spur of the moment.
[H] Just as Walmart is using Bonobos to get access to higher-end consumers and a more technologically savvy way of selling clothes, Amazon is using Whole Foods to get the expertise and physical presence it takes to sell fresh foods. But bigger dimensions of the modern economy also come into play.
[I] The apparel business has long been a highly competitive industry in which countless players could find a niche(商机). Any insight that one shirt-maker developed could be rapidly copied by others, and consumer prices reflected the retailer’s real estate costs and branding approach as much as anything. That helps explain why there are thousands of options worldwide for someone who wants a decent-quality men’s shirt. In that world, any shirt-maker that tried to get too big rapidly faced diminishing returns. It would have to pay more and more to lease the real estate for far-flung stores, and would have to outbid competitors to hire all the experienced shirt-makers. The expansion wouldn’t offer any meaningful cost savings and would entail a lot more headaches trying to manage it all.
[J] But more and more businesses in the modern economy, rather than reflecting those diminishing returns to scale, show positive returns to scale: The biggest companies have a huge advantage over smaller players. That tends to tilt markets toward a handful of players or even a monopoly, rather than an even playing field with countless competitors.
[K] The most extreme example of this would be the software business, where a company can invest bottomless sums in a piece of software, but then sell it to each additional customer for practically nothing. The apparel industry isn’t that extreme—the price of making a shirt is still linked to the cost of fabric and the workers to do the stitching—but it is moving in that direction. And that helps explain why Walmart and Amazon are so eager to put a shirt on my back.
[L] Already, retailers need to figure out how to manage sophisticated supply chains connecting Southeast Asia with stores in big American cities so that they rarely run out of product. They need mobile apps and websites that offer a seamless user experience so that nothing stands between a would-be purchaser and an order. Larger companies that are good at supply chain management and technology can spread those more-or-less fixed costs around more total sales, enabling them to keep prices lower than a niche player and entrench their advantage.
[M] These positive returns to scale could become even more pronounced. Perhaps in the future, rather than manufacture a bunch of shirts in Indonesia and Malaysia and ship them to the United States to be sold one at a time to urban office workers, a company will have a robot manufacture shirts to my specifications somewhere nearby.
[N] If that’s the future of clothing, and quite a few companies are working on just that, apparel will become a landscape of high fixed costs and enormous returns to scale. The handful of companies with the very best shirt-making robots will win the market, and any company that can’t afford to develop shirt-making robots, or isn’t very good at it, might find itself left in the cold.
The price for a shirt depends on many factors, including the cost of fabric and the labor force.
选项
答案
K
解析
[K]段将服装业与软件业的相同趋势做类比,同时指出,制衣的价格与面料及制衣工人的成本相关。题干中的the labor force对应原文中的the workers to do the stitching,故选[K]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/KtP7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
每个人从呱呱坠地起,便有了自己的姓名,然后带着它进入各种社会活动,使之起到代表自我的作用。中国是世界上最早使用姓氏的国家。中国人的姓名文化,是中华民族物质生活和精神生活的重要组成部分。它在政治、文化及社会活动等诸领域中,都发挥着极其重要的作用。中国人的名字
A、Theywillbemorecarefulinbuyingpresents.B、Theywilllearnhowtobudgetandinvestinthefuture.C、Theywillbemoreli
受到中国经济内部动力(dynamics)和外来压力的共同影响,人民币近几年来不断升值(appreciate)。内部影响主要有中国物价水平、通货膨胀状况、经济增长状况以及利率水平,外部影响主要来自发达国家施加的压力,尤其是日本和美国。人民币升值会增加人民币的
中国第一个国际电影节——上海国际电影节(ShanghaiInternationalFilmFestival),于1993年创办,现已成为上海文化生活中重要的一部分。在每年的电影节上,数百部来自世界不同国家和地区的优秀影片同时放映,使上海国际电影节成为
维持生活
希望工程(ProjectHope)是于1989年发起的一项公益事业,以救助贫困地区失学儿童(youngdropouts)为目的。帮助建设希望小学与资助贫困学生是希望工程实施的两大主要任务。中国仍然是一个发展中国家,贫困地区缺乏教育经费的问题依旧严峻。有超
那达慕大会(NadamaFair)是蒙古族(Mongolian)人民具有鲜明民族特色的传统活动。“那达慕”是蒙古语,意为“娱乐、游戏”,还可以表示人们丰收的喜悦之情。每年农历六月初四开始的那达慕大会,是草原上一年一度的盛会。它是为适应蒙古族人民生活需要而
调节
(福利/体育)事业
闻名于世的丝绸之路是一系列连接东西方的路线。丝绸之路延伸6000多公里,得名于古代中国的丝绸贸易。丝绸之路上的贸易在中国、南亚、欧洲和中东文明发展中赳挥了重要作用。正是通过丝绸之路,中国的造纸、火药、指南针、印刷术等四大发明才被引介到世界各地。同样,中国
随机试题
在Word2010中实现文档“替换”操作,可以在________选项卡“编辑”中选择“替换”按钮。
A.甘氨酸B.色氨酸C.酪氨酸D.谷氨酸去甲肾上腺素合成的原料是
男,63岁。2年前出现严重脑卒中遗留偏瘫症状,近1年病情经常波动。记忆力明显下降,情绪不稳定,常发脾气,有时一点小事就哭笑。近3个月明显多疑,认为有人偷他的东西,老伴对他不忠心有外遇,给他下毒谋财害命,还凭空听到有人骂他和议论他的声音,心情低落,有自杀观念
刘稳与刘永系父子关系,刘稳在农村,年老多病.刘永外出做生意,收入颇丰。刘永遂在县城买房定居,但其长期不给其父赡养费导致刘稳生活困难。2015年,刘稳就此诉至人民法院,人民法院判决刘永每月给付刘稳生活费1000元,刘稳、刘永均服判。到2017年1月,刘稳因身
杆OA=I,绕固定轴p转动,某瞬时杆端A点的加速度a如图4-43所示,则该瞬时杆OA的角速度及角加速度为()。
张某知道李某以自己的名义和吴某进行代理活动,但是没有作任何表示,吴某不但不知道李某没有代理权,并完全相信其有代理权,则有关承担代理责任正确的理解是()。
与其他金融机构相比,能够吸收活期存款,创造货币,是()最明显的特征。
A企业2010年销售收入为100亿元,净利润为25亿元,2010年年初总资产为280亿元,2010年年末总资产为220亿元,则该企业2010年的总资产收益率为()。
资本市场通过间接融资方式可以筹集巨额的长期资金。()
A.黏液细胞B.浆液细胞C.闰管细胞D.分泌管细胞E.肌上皮细胞电镜下细胞内充满电子透明的分泌颗粒的细胞是()。
最新回复
(
0
)