2. 考研
  3. If you enjoy the comfort of a white-collar job, you may be stunned to learn just how much you are being watched. Surveillance is

If you enjoy the comfort of a white-collar job, you may be stunned to learn just how much you are being watched. Surveillance is

admin2022-12-09  53
问题     If you enjoy the comfort of a white-collar job, you may be stunned to learn just how much you are being watched. Surveillance is rising because work-from-home policies mean that employers are keen to keep tabs on their remote workforce. Before the pandemic, around one in ten of the large businesses asked by Gartner, a research firm, had spying software. Within three years it expects the share to reach 70％.
    Bosses also have ever-expanding amounts of data at their disposal, enlarging the digital footprint that can be monitored. Widely used software such as Google Workspace or Microsoft Teams can tell managers what time you clock in or how many calls you join on their platforms. The blurring boundaries between work and home mean that video surveillance and other intrusive tools are barging into workers’ personal lives, social-media accounts and private devices at all times of the day.
    The law is scrambling to adjust. In the state of New York employees subject to electronic monitoring must be told in advance, under a new law introduced recently. The European Union’s General Data Protection Regulation establishes some basic rights for staff. Yet it is still early days and the technology is advancing fast. As a result, most firms are only just getting their heads around how much remote work is likely to remain permanent.
    There are perfectly legitimate reasons for surveillance at work. Many jobs require monitoring for safety, security and compliance. In the same way that companies collect data on customers’ behaviour in order to improve their products, so employers are using monitoring tools to measure the productivity and engagement of their most important resource: their people.
    Yet it is easy to see the pitfalls. There is a long history of those with power abusing those without in the name of compliance and efficiency. In the most extreme cases, 20th-century despots ran vast informant networks, and some slave plantations in America and the West Indies kept tyrannical work records.
    Today’s workers are not indentured, obviously. But many studies link excessive individual surveillance to higher levels of stress. And if algorithms trained on biased data are used to make more decisions, the odds of discrimination will rise. One analysis found that AI systems consistently interpret black faces as being angrier than white ones.
    What to do? Employers should have a legitimate reason for surveillance. Although the boundary will take time to establish through case law and precedent, this is vital to ensure that monitoring is proportionate. Establishing clear guidelines is not easy, but qualms over the potential abuse of surveillance will grow. It’s time to start drawing some lines.
The author’s attitude toward surveillance at work is one of________.
选项 A、somehow appreciation
B、firm opposition
C、reluctant disapproval
D、reserved consent
答案D
解析 态度题。解答态度题应着眼于全文。通过第二段中对监视的描述以及第五、六段中对监视的负面影响的描述可以看出，作者并未表达对监视的赞赏。作者也并未全盘否定工作中的监视，最后一段提到，雇主应该有合法的理由进行监视，并强调需要“划定一些界限”，因此作者的态度应该是“有保留的接受”，因此D项正确，同时排除A项和B项。作者客观陈述工作中监视的负面影响，并探讨公司应为实施监视做些什么，没有体现出犹豫，故排除C项。故本题答案为D项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/LQMD777K
0

考研英语二

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)