首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is fire-and-hire attitude right or not when employing people? Why not?
Is fire-and-hire attitude right or not when employing people? Why not?
admin
2010-02-11
68
问题
Is fire-and-hire attitude right or not when employing people? Why not?
选项
答案
Suggested answers: a.I think company should retain experienced staff. Fire-and-hire attitude costs employers a lot of money a year. Take Hong Kong employers for example. When it comes to hiring the fight people and training them for the job, Hong Kong bosses come off worst in a survey of seven economies. Their poor hiring practices cost them $39 billion a year, or 3 per cent of the city’s output. b.Companies must retain experienced staff. If they don’t do it, they will lose their core competence. The vicious cycle caused by high staff turnover and the constant hiring of unsuitable people translated into staggering economic losses. The alarm was raised recently by British-based SHL, a manpower assessment company, which commissioned the survey that found Hong Kong managers spent a fifth of their time correcting mistakes made by their staff and that one in four employees left their job before they became competent at it. c.China clearly lags behind the other countries surveyed, with $30 billion wasted on poor-people performance. It’s a staggering figure. To put it in perspective, it is nearly what China spends on education every year. If the Chinese employers really want to employ the right people for the fight job, they need to look at the way they hire employees, looking specifically at the assessment process and asking themselves if it is really helping them decide on the right types of employees. d.I don’t think the fire-and-hire attitude is right. Last year, British think-tank The Future Foundation surveyed about 100 managers and 350 workers from each of the economies studied. It found 25 % of HK workers left their jobs before they had mastered them. And HK managers spent 21 per cent of their working hours redoing the work or correcting the mistakes of colleagues. In India, the figure was 16 per cent, in the US 13 per cent, in Australia 12 per cent, in the Netherlands 11 per cent, in Britain 9 per cent and in Sweden 7 per cent. I am not advocating labor laws one way or another, but in Sweden, the law is heavily in favor of the employees, so when companies hire, they have to make sure they hire the right people and invest time in properly training them. The survey results perhaps reflect the fire-and-hire attitude of HK managers, which is highly questionable as an effective human resources strategy. People may be surprised at the findings. I don’t have the impression that so many workers are performing at a low standard.
解析
think-tank思想库,智囊团。fire-and-hire attitude开了再雇的态度。staggering figure棘手的数字,惊人的数字。redo重做,重写,重演。the vicious cycle恶性循环。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/M2Od777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级口语题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级口语
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whomostlikelyarethespeakers?
Whatisthemantalkingabout?
Whatkindofcompanydoesthewomanworkfor?
A、 B、 C、 C问题是选择疑问句,对方可以在A和B之间选择一个,或者可以两者都不选,也可以两者都选。问题问听话者是现在通话还是等会再打,(C)回答说“您随意“,意思是他无所谓,因此(C)是正确答案。这种类型的疑问句也
A、 B、 C、 C“Wouldyoucarefor…?”这一句是提议要不要来杯咖啡,(C)接受了该建议,因此是正确答案。(B)选项的内容是向对方提出建议,因此是错误的。
A、 B、 C、 D、 BTwomenaremakingrepairs.Choice(A)confusesgasusedtooperateanovenandtheflam
A、 B、 C、 B(A)可以用来回答以Where开头的问句,(C)是用来回答Howdoyousend…?的。问句的意思是要不要发送实验结果,(B)所说的“因为已经知道了结果,所以不发也行”是正确答案。
Interrupting中间插话
Makingcomparisons进行比较
Accepting接受条件
随机试题
塞补是指在铸件不甚重要的较厚部位上有较大的孔洞缺陷时,可镶入金属塞头来修补铸件缺陷。()
王某在某商店买回一箱啤酒,后在开箱饮用该啤酒时,其中一瓶发生爆炸,将王某的左手手指炸伤,经治疗花去医药费300余元。王某到商店要求赔偿,商店声称此啤酒是从某批发商张某处购得,应向张某索赔。张某言道,我并没有将此啤酒直接售于你,再说,此爆炸应为产品质量问题,
关于处方的叙述正确的是
A.急性菌痢普通型B.中毒型菌痢C.急性菌痢轻型D.慢性菌痢急性发作型E.慢性菌痢隐匿型急起发热,腹痛,腹泻,脓血便
麻疹是水痘是
下列选项中不属于色彩设置原则的是()。
通报适用于表彰先进、批评错误、传达重要精神和告知重要情况。()
根据材料回答下列问题2006年中国入境旅游、出境旅游和国内旅游均快速增长,旅游产业规模日渐庞大,已成为全球主要旅游国。全年入境旅游人数达到10904万人次,比上年增长18.96%;旅游外汇收入费计为257亿美元,比2005年增长47.67%,其中,出境旅
什么是儿化,它的作用有哪些?请举例说明。(北京语言大学)
如果要在程序代码中为图片框动态加载或清除图形,可以通过()函数来实现。
最新回复
(
0
)