首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The debate about whether food and drinks should be permitted on subways has been raging in China for a long time. In some cities
The debate about whether food and drinks should be permitted on subways has been raging in China for a long time. In some cities
admin
2021-02-24
30
问题
The debate about whether food and drinks should be permitted on subways has been raging in China for a long time. In some cities, such as Shanghai and Wuhan, passengers are not allowed to eat or drink on subways and violators may face fines. What do you think of it? The following are opinions from different sides. Read the excerpt carefully and write your response in NO LESS THAN 300 WORDS, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the different opinions on the issue;
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Write your article on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
Excerpt
The Shanghai Municipal Transport and Port Authority is asking passengers to avoid eating while riding, but also to refrain from other behavior that could annoy their fellow travelers. The new measure covers skating in stations, carrying super-size luggage, smoking and a host of other acts. It was approved in December and took effect on Jan. 1.
Of all the topics, eating was the most controversial. After heated debate about whether a ban should be written into regional regulations, which carry the force of law and include penalties, the authorities compromised.
As enacted, the new rule asks passengers to avoid eating in train cars as a matter of courtesy to others. It does not require them to refrain, nor is any penalty imposed for noncompliance. Eating inside subway stations was not banned.
Nationwide, cities such as Beijing, Guangzhou and Nanjing have enacted similar rules to ban eating in subway cars. Wuhan, capital of Hubei Province, is the only city so far to use a regional law to clamp down on the practice.
In Shanghai, a random survey by China Daily on Thursday morning found that people were largely unaware of the new guideline, though many said they were willing to abide by it. Not everyone thought it was a good idea.
" Society should be more tolerant of those having to eat on the train," said Wu Fangcheng, 27, an IT company employee who was having bread and milk inside the Changshu Road station on Line 1.
He said he preferred to spend more time sleeping in the morning, even if that meant crunching his time for breakfast. But the arrangement is less than ideal.
"If possible, who would not sit down with their loved ones to have a decent breakfast? It’s not comfortable to eat in a swaying train," he said.
Another passenger, who was having a sandwich and yogurt on Line 7, said he was not aware of the rule but would like to follow it.
Bert Quintens, a tourist from Belgium, said he doesn’t find eating by fellow passengers offensive.
" In Belgium, eating on public transportation is also prohibited, but people keep ignoring the rule," he said. "Nobody would stop them, and it is very hard to do so. I think it is acceptable as long as you don’t leave any garbage. "
A dispatch operator at the Changshu Road station, surnamed Yang, said on Thursday that he will intervene to block some discourteous acts in the subway such as smoking or boarding with a pet, but he will not step into a car to stop someone from eating.
Shanghai Shentong Metro Group, the sole operator of the city’s subway network, gave no specific directions as to enforcement of the new rule. Yang said, "It is OK as long as no one complains about it. "
Wu Junshang, a manager of passenger service at the Shanghai Metro Operation Management Center, said the no-eating rule may not be very effective since it is not compulsory. At the same time, it would hard to enforce if it is included in the regional law, Wu said.
Qian Zhaocheng, a commentator, said authorities should consider the needs of different groups of passengers. He does not support a law that reaches too far—such as a broad ban on eating in subway cars—he said.
"It’s not people’s own choice," he said. "The great pressure of living requires many people to spend their dining time on the subway. "
选项
答案
My View on Eating on Subways With Shanghai issuing the rules of subway courtesies, debates about eating on subways rage again. The authority asks passengers not to eat in train cars for courtesy reasons, while the public are not in total agreement with this issue. Some think the society should be more tolerant because life is full of pressures. Some believe the rule makes no much difference because the ban is not compulsory and thus less effective and the subway staff share similar points of view. However, my view towards this issue is positive. Firstly, the government’s starting point is to ask people to behave themselves during their traveling via subway. If the practically sealed subway cars are filled with undesirable odors during the morning rush hour, many passengers would be fed up. It’s seen as a courteous gesture not to eat something that is smelly, noisy, and messy. Common considerations used to hold that eating in front of others that aren’t eating is just plain rude. In many cities, getting caught sneaking a bite of something by fellow passengers is almost as bad as getting fined. Secondly, eating on the train is unhygienic and contributes to germs, pests and trash. As we know, there is the general lack of hygiene underground. More seriously, that food also adds to the uncleanness of the subway; namely it gives rise to the ever-growing rat or cockroach population. Plenty of cities have official no-food policies on their train systems, like Chicago, Washington D. C. , and Shanghai. Laws and regulations need to be enforced. In particular, with crowds rushing into the subway car, we need to take others’ feelings into consideration. To annoy others by satisfying oneself is definitely a selfish deed; to contaminate environment by fulfilling one’s own wish is undoubtedly more selfish.
解析
本题讨论的话题为是否可以在地铁里饮食。随着中国地铁业的发展,这一品德修养类话题也愈发受到人们的关注。根据题目要求,考生需要简要概括材料中的不同观点,并进行评论。在具体行文中,考生应在首段高度概括材料中的观点;其次,在提出个人观点后,应围绕分论点进行详细论证;最后,总结全文,重述论点。在整体写作结构上可灵活处理,但明确主题和分论点会有助于行文的紧凑。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MIIK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhyWeDon’tLikeEnglishClassesI.People’s【T1】______ofhowtolearnEnglish【T1】______A.Preconception:intention—registrat
A、Herdifferentstyle.B、Herdistinctivevoice.C、Heryoungage.D、Hercoolmusic.B主持人说他试着将Alex与其他歌手进行比较,却发现根本没有可比性。因为女士的声音太独特了
Thethirdisproximity,postureandechoing.Proximityreferstothe【T1】______betweenspeakers.Thiscanindicateanumberoft
A、Becausetheyarereadby110,000studentsthisyear.B、Becausetheyaredesignedforstudentsin361colleges.C、Becausethey
Afterthehorrorbecamepublicinhishometown,Sylacauga,Alabama,citycouncilpresidentGeorgeCarltontoldareporter,"Thi
Agreatmanycitiesareexperiencingdifficultieswhicharenothingnewinthehistoryofcities,exceptintheirscale;someci
……合中国旧历的三伏,一年最热的时候。
听人家背地里谈论,孔乙己原来也读过书,但终于没有进学,又不会营生;于是愈过愈穷,弄到将要讨饭了。幸而写得一笔好字,便替人家抄抄书,换一碗饭吃。可惜他又有一样坏脾气,便是好喝懒做。坐不到几天,便连人和书籍纸张笔砚,一齐失踪。如是几次,叫他抄书的人也没有了。孔
一些条件较好的地区,作物一年可以收获三次。
从50年代开始传统文学一直受鄙视。现在又提“解构”“全球化”都是西方的东西。但新东西还是在旧东西基础上演化出来的。像现在总提的纳米(nano)杯子、纳米茶叶,东西还是老的陶瓷,是将老东西变成了新形态。现在提传统的经典是否重要,让我想起一位老先生的儿子说起想
随机试题
人民法院受理破产申请后,管理人接管债务人的财产之前,对于已经开始而尚未终结的有关债务人的民事诉讼或者仲裁,下列说法正确的是:()
如何使用橡皮图章工具在图象中取样:
证明氨水是弱碱的事实是()。
患儿,男,1岁,弛张高热,咳嗽6天,精萎纳差,时有呕吐,周围血WBC26×109/L,查体:烦躁不安,气促,面色苍白,皮肤可见猩红热样皮疹,两肺可闻中小湿啰音。该患儿在治疗过程中突然出现呼吸困难加重,经吸痰和给予氧气吸入后无明显缓解,应考虑可能是
根据《企业会计准则》规定,施工企业发生的固定资产日常修理费应作为()予以确认。
用以反映企业资本的账户是()。
警卫工作包括()。
我要说,我们的政治制度不是从我们邻人的制度中模仿得来的。我们的制度是别人的模范,而不是我们模仿任何其他的人的。我们的制度之所以被称为民主政治,因为政权是在全体公民手中,而不是在少数人手中。解决私人争执的时候,每个人在法律上都是平等的;让一个人负担公职优
A、 B、 C、 D、 D
张教授:如果在视觉上不能辨别艺术复制品和真品之间的差异,那么复制品就应该和真品的价值一样。因为如果两件艺术品在视觉上无差异,那么它们就有相同的品质。要是它们有相同的本质,它们的价格就应该相等。李研究员:你对艺术了解太少了!即使某人做了一件精致的复
最新回复
(
0
)