首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps
admin
2018-01-01
46
问题
A major study of the grocery-buying habits of millions of Americans released late last year found that people using food stamps generally make the same unhealthy food choices as everyone else in America. Too many sweets, salty snacks and prepared desserts, junk food, in other words. But when it came to soda and its sugary ilk, the results were more surprising, and not in a good way. According to the USDA-funded study, shoppers using food stamps spent a larger share of their budget—9.25% to be exact—on sugar-sweetened beverages than other shoppers. Even more startling: Food-stamp shoppers bought more soda than any other single grocery item.
The new data revived an old debate about banning soda from the $71-billion food-stamp program. In February, the House Agriculture Committee held a hearing to gather testimony about the pros and cons of such a restriction. It does seem counterproductive to spend billions of taxpayer dollars in an effort to improve the nutrition of low-income Americans on a product with little or no nutritional value. It is called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, after all. And soda had been identified as one of the prime culprits in soaring U.S. obesity and Type 2 diabetes rates.
The study and committee debate raised some of the same uncomfortable issues that have caused the proposal to languish in the past. On the conservative side, folks have worried that this type of nannystate regulation will lead to other heavy-handed health-related restrictions. Liberals, meanwhile, have been concerned that it is patronizing and punitive to tell people how to spend their government benefits. Add in the opposition from beverage industry lobby and it’s no surprise this idea hasn’t gotten very far when it’s been proposed. In recent years, a handful of states and cities have tried to impose such a requirement, but were blocked by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
The difference now is that the attitude toward soda has rapidly soured as more evidence has poured in that beverages with added sugars are making people fat and sick. The USDA has issued dietary guidelines warning people to limit their consumption of food with added sugars, the largest sources of which are sweetened beverages. This belief helped San Francisco, Philadelphia and handful of other cities push through new taxes on soda. A handful more are considering their own soda levies.
We know that there are detrimental health effects of drinking lots of soda, but we don’t know if barring SNAP recipients from spending their benefits on soda will really improve their health. It’ s worth finding out by undertaking a limited pilot program, regardless of the qualms we may have about imposing restraints on the poor that better-off Americans don’t face. The assumption is that those billions of dollars not going to buy Coke will be spent on healthier food. But that may not be the case. What if consumption of other sugary items increases? Or if SNAP recipients simply transferred their sweet drink habit ounce-for-ounce to more expensive and still sugar-laden fruit juice? Or if they spent their non-SNAP money on soda? Before making a permanent change, we need to know if it would improve nutrition or be pointlessly punitive.
But it is a good step to take to gather data. And the argument that it would be too hard on grocers to carve out sugary drinks doesn’t hold water. As the study shows, modern grocery check stand technology is sophisticated enough to easily separate out purchases by UPC code. Indeed, SNAP already comes with restrictions on alcohol, tobacco and hot foods. Grocers don’t have a problem sorting them out. The Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program is even more prescriptive, permitting only specific items to be purchased: milk, cheese, cereal and formula, for example, but absolutely nothing with added sugar or artificial sweetener. Ideally, a pilot program would also find ways to improve access to safe drinking water. Denying poor people the ability to use food aid to buy a Coke on a hot day may raise some unsettling questions. Yet the findings in the USDA’s study about excessive soda consumption shouldn’t be ignored.
What is the passage mainly about?
选项
A、The investigation of the grocery-buying habits of Americans.
B、New taxes on soda to be levied to restrict the use of food stamps.
C、A comparison between SNAP and Women, Infant and Children food-assistance program.
D、An argument over SNAP recipients’ use of food stamps to buy soda.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/MlSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
下面你将听到一段有关城市规划与环保的讲话。
下面你将听到一段有关人口老龄化问题的讲话。
ThecompanybeganbyofferingcomputersoftwaresolutionstolocalbusinessesinthegreaterSeattlemetropolitanarea.
Thetwomenhavebeenveryintimateandreliablefriendsthroughouttheirlives.
Economicsendowsprospectivebusinessmenwithquiteafewdesirablequalities,suchasintelligenceandintuition.
A、ManyAmericanscannotaffordhighereducationbecauseofthesoaringcollegetuitionfeesandexpenses.B、Sendingtheirchildr
A、Sheisplanningtobuyarefrigerator.B、Sheisinterestedinfashiondesign.C、Shewantedtoknowsomethingaboutasubject.
Becauseofsatellitelinkswhichnowenablebroadcastnewsorganizationstooriginateliveprogrammingfromanypartoftheglob
Californiaisalandofvarietyandcontrast.Almosteverytypeofphysicallandfeature,sortofarcticicefieldsandtropical
A、Poachers.B、Tourists.C、Mountaineers.D、Elephanttrainers.B
随机试题
继发性肺结核的特点是()
下列选项中,属于清骨散组成的药物有
根据《行政诉讼证据规定》,下列说法错误的有:()
有一段说明为:“雷达测速仪用于检测车辆的行驶速度,以保证车辆的行驶安全,属于强制检定的工作计量器具。它辅以数码照相设备(俗称“电子眼”),以准确的计量数据和清晰的照片作为对行车超速者处罚的依据。它的特点之一,其固定测速误差为±1Km/h,运动测速误差为±
关于劳务派遣的说法,正确的有()。
下列关于商品流通企业库存作用的表述,错误的是()。
下列金融业务运营模式中,属于传统金融业务电子模式的有()。
家住某市甲区的刘某为了给5岁的儿子小东取暖,从该市乙区的小商品市场一个租赁柜台老板王某处花15元购买了一个暖手宝。5天后,暖手宝充电时突然爆炸,将在旁边玩耍的小东烫伤,刘某遂找到王某协商赔偿事宜,但双方对赔偿数额争执不下。后经查实,该暖手宝没有产品合格证和
《坛经》中记载:“时有风吹幡动,一僧日风动,一僧日幡动,议论不已。惠能进日:不是风动,不是幡动,仁者心动。”这段话表明惠能关于运动的基:本观点是
空想社会主义与科学社会主义的根本区别在于
最新回复
(
0
)