首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Great philosophy is not always easy. Some philosophers—Kant, Hegel, Heidegger—write in a way that seems almost perversely obscur
Great philosophy is not always easy. Some philosophers—Kant, Hegel, Heidegger—write in a way that seems almost perversely obscur
admin
2023-02-22
45
问题
Great philosophy is not always easy. Some philosophers—Kant, Hegel, Heidegger—write in a way that seems almost perversely obscure. Others—Kierkegaard, Nietzsche, Wittgenstein—adopt an aphoristic style. Modern analytic philosophers can present their arguments in a compressed form that places heavy demands on the reader. Hence, there is ample scope for philosophers to interpret the work of their predecessors. One might get the impression that obscurity is a virtue in philosophy, a mark of a certain kind of greatness—but I’m skeptical.
To some degree, all texts need interpretation. Working out what people mean isn’t simply a matter of decoding their words, but speculating about their mental states. The same words could express quite different thoughts, and the reader has to decide between the interpretations.【B16】________________________Why should philosophy need more interpretation than other texts?
Academics assume an advanced knowledge of their field, as well as familiarity with conceptual nuances, contemporary references, cultural norms. All this background needs filling in for those outside the tradition. When dealing with work from another time or culture, different scholars might produce different interpretations of the original.【B17】______________________This doesn’t explain the special difficulties presented by some philosophical texts.
Maybe these difficulties exist because great philosophers operate at a higher intellectual level than the rest of us, packing their work with profound insights, complex ideas and subtle distinctions.【B18】__________
Such a failure of communication is a defect rather than a virtue. Skilled writers shouldn’t need interpreters to patch up holes in their texts.
Another explanation focuses on the nature of philosophical enquiry.【B19】_______Consequently, great works of philosophy naturally generate different interpretations. But is that because readers engage with the problem being discussed and explore their own ideas about it? Or because they engage with the problem of what the author meant and try to come up with hypotheses? Only the former is the mark of good philosophy. A work can be tentative, exploratory and suggestive without being hard to understand.
Perhaps obscure texts are more open to reinterpretation. Philosophy, some argue, does not progress
as science does.【B20】______________By contrast, unambiguous texts can soon seem sterile and dated.
If one is grappling with the same problem as an earlier writer, it might be useful to study his work, but devotion to reinterpretation betrays a misplaced focus on philosophers rather than philosophical problems. It is not easy to write clearly, especially on philosophical topics. Clear writers stand naked before their critics, with all their argumentative blemishes visible; but they are braver, more honest and more respectful of the true aims of intellectual enquiry.
[A] But this openness to interpretation is merely an accident of distance. The text could have been quite clear to its original readers, and with sufficient knowledge we might settle on a definitive reading.
[B] But it doesn’t follow that all texts are equally hard to interpret. Some interpretations might be more psychologically plausible than others, and a writer can narrow the range of possible interpretations.
[C] It’s prudent to be very suspicious of such texts; they must earn their status as serious works through a long history of intellectual fertility.
[D] Philosophical problems aren’t solved but continually re-explored in new contexts, and each generation returns to great works of the past and reinterprets them for its own time. So texts that are obscure are more likely to become classics, since they naturally lend themselves to reinterpretation.
[E] We might need these difficult thoughts unpacked by interpreters and, since these are usually less gifted than the original authors, they might differ on the correct reading. But then, if a clear interpretation of the ideas can be provided, why didn’t the original authors do it themselves?
[F] Philosophers do not simply marshal facts: they engage reflectively with a problem, raising questions, teasing out connections, investigating ideas. Readers can respond with their own questions, connections and ideas.
[G] Some great philosophers might write obscurely because it creates an aura of profundity and mystery. This invites interpretation and scholarly attention: special effort is required to engage with the work, helping to create a cult following among scholars.
【B20】
选项
答案
D
解析
空格前指出哲学的发展不同于科学,猜测空格处可能会接着指出哲学不同在哪里。空格后指出清晰易懂的文本(unambiguous texts)很快便显得枯燥乏味。然后过时;其中的By contrast说明空格处应该会谈到与清晰易懂的文本风格相反的文本。D紧扣空格前的内容,指出哲学与科学发展的不同之处:很多哲学问题并没有解决,且没有固定答案,因此每一代人都可回溯经典,探寻追问,做出适应时代的诠释,D还讲到为什么晦涩的文本更能成为经典,这既是对本段首句的呼应,也与空格后的内容形成对比,与By contrast所表现的句间逻辑相符,与空格后也能合理衔接。故本题选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/N4MD777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Formuchofthe20thcentury,milkwasasimplepartofdailylifeintheU.S.,asfarmersraisedcows,milkmendeliveredbottle
Formuchofthe20thcentury,milkwasasimplepartofdailylifeintheU.S.,asfarmersraisedcows,milkmendeliveredbottle
SupposeyouareamemberofStudentUnion,writeanoticetorecruitstaffforanInternationalConferenceonlanguageteaching.
TheWorldBank,InternationalTelecommunicationsUnion(ITU),GlobalSystemforMobileTelecommunicationsAssociation(GSMA),an
A.HelptodetectasuspectB.DiscoverthepotentialhealthproblemsearlierC.RevealtheunknownsofthefamilyD
Mostpastresearchaboutconversationshasbeenconductedbylinguistsorsociologists.Psychologistswhohavestudiedconversat
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
TheInternetaffordsanonymitytoitsusers,ablessingtoprivacyandfreedomofspeech.Butthatveryanonymityisalsobehind
Inrecentweeks,BenSilbermann,aco-founderofthedigitalpinboardservicePinterest,resignedaschiefexecutive;JoeGebbia
随机试题
简述调查人员的三项基本职责。
Themanagerclaimedthathiscompanyhadthe()rightofpublication.
川乌的剧毒成分是
A.抗感染B.剖胸探查C.同定胸壁D.穿刺排气减压E.迅速封闭胸壁伤口开放性气胸的紧急处理应
砌筑拱和拱顶时,必须()。
按照《公路工程国内招标文件范本》的相关规定,投标人的投标文件必须包括()
某二级耐火等级的办公室,建筑高度为24m,其周边布置有多个二级耐火等级的建筑,下列关于该办公建筑与周边建筑物防火间距的做法中,正确的有()。
下列各项中,关于明显微小错报的说法中,不恰当的是()。
2005年5月3日,受中共中央和国务院的委托,中共中央台湾工作办公室、国务院台湾事务办公室主任陈云林宣布,大陆同胞向台湾同胞赠送一对象征和平团结友爱的大熊猫;同时宣布,大陆有关方面将于近期开放大陆居民赴台湾(),扩大开放台湾()准入并对其中
Ifyouwanttoimproveyourchild’sresultsatschool,【T1】______thattheydoplentyofexercise.Scientistshavealreadyshownt
最新回复
(
0
)