首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
58
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
What is the argument in the first paragraph about earning money?
选项
A、People are likely to make decisions reasonably.
B、Behavioral economists are likely to act with overconfidence.
C、Clever people are capable to earn a great fortune.
D、Intelligent people tend to behave the same with the foolish one.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NCKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CThesubwayanswerswhatisthefastestwaytogetdowntown.Choice(A)confusestheoppositesslowand
A、 B、 C、 ATakethenumber14busadvisesthequestionercorrectly.Choice(B)usesthepasttense.Choice(C)confus
A、 B、 C、 BWedidn’thavetimetotypeitanswerswhytheletterwasnottyped.Choice(A)confusesthewordstype
A、 B、 C、 AHowaboutthefrontrowoffersasuggestionofwheretosit.Choice(B)answersthequestionwhen,not
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
Question询问
Askingquestions征询
随机试题
因故退还的我国出口货物,可以免征进口关税,已征收的出口关税,应予退还。()
风为什么天地这般复杂地把风约束在中间?硬的东西把它挡住,软的东西把它牵绕。不管它怎样猛烈地吹;吹过遮天的山峰,摆脱缭绕的树林,扫过辽阔的海洋,终逃不到天地之外去。或者为此,风一辈子不能平静,和人的感情一样。也许最平静的风,还是拂拂微风。果然
患者,男,25岁。低热2周。查体:气管不偏,右侧胸部呼吸运动减弱,右下肺触觉语颤正常,叩诊呈浊音,肺泡呼吸音减低,未闻及湿啰音,左肺未见异常。(2008年第91题)根据患者的右侧胸部体征,可诊断为
A.由纤维母细胞增生形成有蒂的硬的实性块物B.肿物质软,生长缓慢,呈圆形分叶状C.肿物单发,表面覆有油脂性物质,有恶变倾向D.肿物包膜完整,与表皮不粘连,极少发生恶变E.多发生在生育年龄,肿物质硬
纯交换的完全竞争市场上有两个消费者A和B,两种商品X和y,消费者A和B的效用函数分别为U(XA,YA)=XAYA和U(XB,YB)=lnXB+αlnYB。其中,XA,YA分别为消费者A在X、Y上的消费,XB,YB同理。A和B的初始禀赋分别为(eAX,eAY
设线性方程组与方程(Ⅱ):x1+2x2+x3=a-1有公共解,求a的值及所有公共解。
为了提高数据库性能,在销售单据表中增加“总价”字段(由表中“单价”ד数量”计算而来),此种数据库优化方法被称为增加【11】冗余列方法。
"WelcometoU.S.A.!Majorcreditcardsaccepted!"Bythemilliontheyarecoming—nolongerthetired,thepoor,thewretch
Theprincipalpurposeofthispassageisto______.Inthepassagetheauthorisprimarilyconcernedwith______.
Usually,therearetworeasonstopursuescientificknowledge:forthesakeoftheknowledgeitself,andforthepracticaluse
最新回复
(
0
)