首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
61
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
What is the argument in the first paragraph about earning money?
选项
A、People are likely to make decisions reasonably.
B、Behavioral economists are likely to act with overconfidence.
C、Clever people are capable to earn a great fortune.
D、Intelligent people tend to behave the same with the foolish one.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NCKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CThesubwayanswerswhatisthefastestwaytogetdowntown.Choice(A)confusestheoppositesslowand
A、 B、 C、 BWedidn’thavetimetotypeitanswerswhytheletterwasnottyped.Choice(A)confusesthewordstype
A、 B、 C、 AHowaboutthefrontrowoffersasuggestionofwheretosit.Choice(B)answersthequestionwhen,not
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Askingquestions征询
随机试题
不属于传统孝服“五服”的是()
银团贷款的特点。
均主湿的脉象是
下列最符合胃溃疡上腹痛特点的是
外伤后急性硬脑膜外血肿患者典型的意识障碍形式是
A.救死扶伤,不辱使命B.尊重患者,一视同仁C.依法执业,质量第一D.进德修业。珍视声誉E.尊重同仁,密切协作根据《中国执业药师职业道德准则适用指导》执业药师应当积极主动接受继续教育,体现了
案情:甲公司从某银行贷款1200万元,以自有房产设定抵押,并办理了抵押登记。经书面协议,乙公司以其价值200万元的现有的以及将有的生产设备、原材料、半成品、产品为甲公司的贷款设定抵押,没有办理抵押登记。后甲公司届期无力清偿贷款,某银行欲行使抵押权。法院拟拍
当x|x|<4时,幂级数的和函数是()。
生命中最主要的物质基础是()。
根据以下情境材料,回答下列问题。民警小王在办理一起扒窃案件时发现,其所在分局辖区内8月份发生的扒窃案件超出常量发生范围,发案部位主要集中在超市、卖场、快餐店和菜市场。小王通过单位工作平台对分局刑事案件发案情况进行了统计,得到了表1的数据。在对案件分
最新回复
(
0
)