首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
66
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
What is the argument in the first paragraph about earning money?
选项
A、People are likely to make decisions reasonably.
B、Behavioral economists are likely to act with overconfidence.
C、Clever people are capable to earn a great fortune.
D、Intelligent people tend to behave the same with the foolish one.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/NCKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CThesubwayanswerswhatisthefastestwaytogetdowntown.Choice(A)confusestheoppositesslowand
A、 B、 C、 ATakethenumber14busadvisesthequestionercorrectly.Choice(B)usesthepasttense.Choice(C)confus
A、 B、 C、 BWedidn’thavetimetotypeitanswerswhytheletterwasnottyped.Choice(A)confusesthewordstype
A、 B、 C、 AHowaboutthefrontrowoffersasuggestionofwheretosit.Choice(B)answersthequestionwhen,not
A、 B、 C、 A因为是由Do开头的疑问句,所以答案就要以Yes/No开头。所以正确答案是(A)。在把article错误地理解成“物品”而不是“文章”时,容易误将(B)和(C)当做答案。
Inthispart,theinterlocutorasksquestionstoeachofthecandidatesinturn.Youhavetogiveinformationaboutyourselfand
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetop
Question询问
随机试题
高校设立家政本科专业受到舆论的质疑,因为在传统观念中,大学生是“天之骄子”,保姆似乎“低人一等”,二者难以划上等号。正是这样的错误观念,导致家政行业从业人员良莠不齐,整体素质不高。其实,家政行业是考验从业者综合素质的行业,高校设立家政专业,符合市场需求。当
如图1-1所示,用游标卡尺测得尺寸读数M为100.04mm,游标卡尺每个量爪的宽度b为5mm,两孔直径分别是D=24.04mm,d=15.96mm。求两孔中心距L。
患者咳嗽。查体:气管向左偏移,右侧胸廓较左侧饱满,叩诊出现鼓音。应首先考虑的是
女性,35岁。右上腹痛2天,伴恶心、呕吐,今起疼痛阵发性加剧,伴畏寒,发热。体检:T38℃,巩膜无黄染,右上腹有压痛,诊断首先考虑
常见的青紫型先天性心脏病是
《证券法》规定,公开发行公司债券有一定的条件,对其描述错误的是()。
下列给水排水管道工程施工质量控制应符合的规定,符合规范要求的有()。
保温结构在埋地状况下需要增设()。
该镇长擅自将他认为偏低的秋粮产量数据加以修改上报,这属于()统计资料的行为。对该镇长自行修改统计资料和勒令统计人员下岗待业的行为,应依法给予()。
乙公司拟开办航空业务并将其基地设在印度尼西亚,以使企业多元化发展。在分析该战略提案时,乙公司需要对外部环境进行评估,其可使用的分析工具有()。(2009年)
最新回复
(
0
)