首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even creat
admin
2012-04-23
49
问题
I have a plan that will raise wages, lower prices, increase the nation’s stock of scientists and engineers, and maybe even create the next Google. Better yet, this plan won’t cost the government a dime. In fact, it will save a lot of money. But few politicians are going to want to touch it. Here’s the plan: More immigration. A pathway to legal status for undocumented immigrants. And a recognition that immigration policy is economic policy, and needs to be thought of as such.
See what I meant about politicians not liking it?
Economists will tell you that immigrants raise wages for the average native-born worker. They’ll tell you that they make things cheaper for us to buy here, and that if we didn’t have immigrants for some of these jobs, the jobs would move to other countries. They’ll tell you that we should allow for much more highly skilled immigration, because that’s about as close to a free lunch as you’re likely to find. They’ll tell you that the people who should most want a path to legal status for undocumented immigrants are the low-income workers who are most opposed to such plans. And about all this, the economists are right.
There are also noneconomic considerations, of course. Integrating cultures and nationalities is difficult. Undocumented immigrants raise issues of law and fairness. Border security is important. Those questions are important. They’re just not the subject of this column.
The mistake we make when thinking about the effect immigrants have on our wages, says Giovanni Peri, an economist at the University of California at Davis who has studied the issue extensively, is we imagine an economy where the number of jobs is fixed. Then, if one immigrant comes in, he takes one of those jobs or forces a worker to accept a lower wage. But that’s not how our economy works. With more labor—particularly more labor of different kinds—the economy grows larger. It produces more stuff. There are more workers buying things and that increases the total number of jobs. We understand perfectly well that Europe is in trouble because its low birth rates mean fewer workers and that means less economic growth. We ourselves worry that we’re not graduating enough scientists and engineers. But the economy doesn’t care if it gets workers through birth rates or green cards.
In fact, there’s a sense in which green cards are superior. Economists separate new workers into two categories: Those who "substitute" for existing labor—we’re both construction workers, and the boss can easily swap you out for me; and those who "complement" existing labor—you’re a construction engineer and I’m a construction worker. Immigrants, more so than U.S.-born workers, tend to be in the second category, as the jobs you want to give to someone who doesn’t speak English very well and doesn’t have many skills are different from the jobs you give to people who are fluent and have more skills.
But that’s only half of their benefit. "Living standards are a function of two things," says Michael Greenstone, director of the Hamilton Project, which is hosting a Washington conference on the economics of immigration next week. "They’re a function of our wages and the prices of the goods we purchase. " And immigrants reduce the prices of those goods. Patricia Cortes, an economist at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business, found that immigrants lowered the prices in "immigrant-intensive industries" like housekeeping and gardening by about 10 percent. So our wages go up and the prices of the things we want to buy go down.
We should remember, though, that the average worker isn’t every worker. A study by Harvard economists George Borjas and Lawrence Katz found that although immigrants raised native wages overall, they slightly hurt the 8 percent of workers without a high-school education and those with a college education. A subsequent study by Peri looked harder at the ways immigrant labor differed from native labor and found that all groups of workers saw a benefit from immigrants—though unskilled workers saw less of a benefit than highly skilled workers.
And unskilled workers face even tougher competition from undocumented immigrants who, because their status is so tenuous, will accept pay beneath the minimum wage. And they are unlikely to complain about safety regulations or work conditions. That takes unskilled immigrants from being a bit cheaper than unskilled natives and makes them a lot cheaper—which makes employers likelier to hire them for jobs that native workers could do better.
This suggests, first, that American workers would be better off if we figured out a way to take the 12 million undocumented immigrants and give them legal status, and second, that we might want to give them more direct help if we’re going to increase immigration. Both are possible—just politically difficult.
Our immigration policy should be primarily oriented around our national goals. And one goal is to have the world’s most innovative and dynamic economy. It’s never going to be the case that each and every one of the planet’s most talented individuals is born on American soil. But those born elsewhere could be lured here. People like living here. We should be leveraging that advantage, mercilessly roaming the globe, finding the most talented people and attracting them to our country. When we have the best talent, we have the best innovations. That’s how we landed Google, Intel, and the atomic bomb. Immigrants are about twice as likely as native-born Americans to start a small business, and they’re 30 percent more likely to apply for a patent.
Which of the following best indicates the main idea of the passage?
选项
A、Immigration is an economic policy as well as a politic policy.
B、Immigration will raise wages for the average native-born worker.
C、Immigration helps the economy and most American workers.
D、Immigration policy should be primarily oriented around the national goals.
答案
C
解析
该题为归纳总结题。该文章主要探讨扩大合法移民数量政策的益处,即有助于本国经济的增长和提高普通本国工人的工资。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PGiO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Canada’sEducationSystemTheCanadiangovernmentprovides【1】publiceducationforallstudentsfromKindergartentoGrade12.
LanguageFamiliesAllofthelanguageswithinalanguagefamilyare【1】andallofthemhaveasimilarhistory.Let’stakeabr
IsmailKadare,whowasrewardedtheManBooker【M1】______internationalprizeforliteraturethisyear,isthefirst
Theworldisgoingthroughthebiggestwaveofmergersandacquisitionseverwitnessed.TheprocesssweepsfromhyperactiveAmer
20世纪末的中国,经过新民主主义革命,已非20世纪初的中国,但是我们一直到了1979年,才真正地找到了“发展才是硬件”的道理,似乎是太晚了一点。如果我们在1949年建国之后,在清除旧社会残渣余孽的同时,把主要精力放在发展经济这个“硬件”上世纪末的中国将会是
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
Universitiesarenolongerrelativelyemptyinsummer.Asthestudentsmoveout,holiday-makersmove,eventothemostunl
STRUGGLINGTOENDCRIME"YOUTHSClaimBoredomIsMainCauseofJuvenileCrime."declaredaheadlineinaleadingBritishnews
STRUGGLINGTOENDCRIME"YOUTHSClaimBoredomIsMainCauseofJuvenileCrime."declaredaheadlineinaleadingBritishnews
推进产业结构优化升级,形成以高新技术产业为先导、基础产业和制造业为支撑、服务业全面发展的产业格局。优先发展信息产业,在经济和社会领域广泛应用信息技术。积极发展对经济增长有突破性重大带动作用的高新技术产业。用高新技术和先进适用技术改造传统产业,大力振兴装备制
随机试题
“上联:八百里洞庭凭岳阳壮阔;下联:两千年赤壁览黄鹤风流。”这一对联表示的省区分别是:
设p(x)=a0xn+a1xn-1+…+an-1x+an.其中ai(i=0,1,…,n)为实数,a0≠0,n≥1.证明:|p(x)|=+∞.
下面哪些药物不适用于头颈部鳞癌的治疗
与鼻咽癌发生相关的病毒是
下列疾病过程中,红、肿、热、痛、功能障碍表现比较明显的是
PACO2>45mmHg可见于中枢性或外周性呼吸抑制导致肺泡通气不足。()
企业购入资产超过正常信用条件延期付款实质上具有融资性质时,应按购买价款的现值,借记“固定资产”、“在建工程”等科目,按应支付的价款总额,贷记()科目,按其差额,借记“未确认融资费用”科目。
“众里寻他千百度,蓦然回首,那人却在灯火阑珊处。”这是辛弃疾《青玉案.元夕》里的名句,“元夕”指的是()。
根据《中华人民共和国未成年人保护法》的规定,学校、幼儿园的教职员应当尊重未成年人的(),不得对未成年人和儿童实施体罚、变相体罚。
一项任务必须由你和同事共同完成。但是期间你同事接到一个电话说有紧急情况,要请假。你怎么办?
最新回复
(
0
)