首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much publi
admin
2017-11-28
66
问题
Directions: A report revealing the reduced role of the English test in China’s college entrance examination has drawn much public attention. In some provinces, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100, and by 2020, the English test will be removed from China’s college entrance exam, according to the Ministry of Education. The students will instead be allowed to take two exams a year and pick the best result for their college admission. What do you think of this test reform and what’s the possible effect it may produce on our English teaching and learning? Write a composition of about 400 words to clarify your own points of view about this topic You should use your own ideas, knowledge or experience to generate support for your argument Write your answer on the answer sheet (30 points)
Note: In the first part of your writing you should state clearly the thesis statement (i. e., your main argument), and in the second part you should support your argument with appropriate details. In the last part you should bring what you have written to a natural conclusion or a summary. Marks will be awarded for content, organization, grammar and appropriateness. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
选项
答案
It is reported that in some provinces of China, the English test score has been reduced from 150 to 100 in the national college entrance examination, known as "Gaokao". And the Ministry of Education has also worked out a plan for phasing out the English test from the "Gaokao" system. Instead, the English test will be held twice a year to allow students in senior high school to choose the best score for their college admission. Such changes made in the English test have aroused a heated discussion among educators, students and parents. Opinions are divided on this test reform. Some people view reducing English weight in overall admissions test scores as a strong measure to cool down nationwide English mania and reverse the prevailing practice in school that gives emphasis to English over Chinese, while others doubt whether the reform would reduce students’ burden of learning English or whether the substitute test could reflect students English skills and help students learn English better. As far as I’m concerned, the test reform is a positive move toward a better "Gaokao" system. The main reason for my point is that the reform changes China’s once-in-a-lifetime exam system by giving students more test-taking chances. As is known to us all, "Gaokao" is the principal method by which most students enter almost all higher education institutions in China, and their performance in the exam will influence them a lot. However, there were always people who were good at English but unluckily performed poorly in the English exam. Owing to this reform, such people can take the English exam for several times and avoid the worst result for their college admission. Therefore, it is no exaggeration to say that this test reform makes the "Gaokao" system more fair and reasonable. What’s more, the change in scores will help relieve students from heavy academic burdens. For many students who are not interested in English, it’s unnecessary for them to spend so much time studying it, and for those who have a passion for English, they can study it in college. Of course, reducing the weight of English in the entrance exam doesn’t mean English is no longer important for Chinese students. Instead, the reform makes us reconsider the proper way for English teaching and learning. The low-end and exam-oriented English teaching and learning has come under heavy criticism for making most English learners dabblers. Indeed, English learners are not taught to gain high scores in tests, but to master the language in a real sense. Therefore, English teaching and learning must be reoriented to lay due emphasis on using English in real life.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Pdua777K
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Whichofthefollowingitalicizedpartisaninflectionalmorpheme?().
WhichofthefollowingnovelistswroteTheSoundandtheFury?()
“HehasaservantcalledFriday.”“he”inthequotedsentenceisacharacterin________.
文理学院(LiberalArtsCollege),又称博雅学院,是美国高校的重要种类之一。文理学院一般指奉行博雅教育,以本科教育为主、规模小而精的大学。文理学院注重全面综合教育,强调发掘学生的思维潜能.实现真正意义上的全人发展。其课程设置以基础学科为主
Hewouldhavefinishedhiscollegeeducation,buthe______toquitandfindajobtosupporthisfamily.
Roy,whowassupposedtoonadiet,keptmaking______tripstothekitchentonibbleonthisandthat,wheneverhethoughtnoon
Theclamorousgroupofchildrenenjoyedtheparkallafternoon.
Oneimportantoutcomeoftheworkontheexpressionofgenesindevelopingembryosissuretobeknowledgethatcanhelpp
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
Theroleofgovernmentsinenvironmentalmanagementisdifficultbutinescapable.Sometimes,thestatetriestomanagetheresou
随机试题
新生儿颅内出血兴奋状态的表现有
绘制下图所示梁的弯矩图。下图(b)中节点C发生单位转动。
A.胃肠道反应B.乳酸酸中毒C.低血糖反应D.白细胞减少E.水肿格列本脲最常见的不良反应是
CT导向穿刺活检拔针后扫描目的在于
患者,男,38岁。婚后7年未育,性欲减退,阳痿早泄,伴腰酸腿软,疲软无力,小便清长,舌质淡,苔薄白,脉沉细,除辨证属肾阳虚衰证外,还需“辨精用药”,据患者精子数少、成活率低、活动力差的情况,应在金匮肾气丸合五子衍宗丸的主方基础上加用
有3个大人、2个小孩要一次同时过河,渡口有大船、中船、小船各一只,大船最多能载1个大人、2个小孩,中船最多能载大人、小孩各1人,小船最多能载大人1人,为了安全,小孩需大人陪同,则乘船的方式有多少种7
《雷雨》:周朴园
正强化(2000年名词解释)
最近,一位历史学家在研究的过程中,发现了两份提到同一个人——司涅孜勒的资料,其中一份标明的日期是1739年5月3日,是一份司涅孜勒由于未经允许沿街叫卖而被逮捕的记录;第二份未标明日期,是一份司涅孜勒宣称他已经断断续续地沿街叫卖20年的声明。以上的事实最好地
已知a=6,b=15,c=23,则语句PrintSgn(a+bMod6-c\a)&a+b的输出结果为( )。
最新回复
(
0
)