首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Humans are startlingly bad at detecting fraud. Even when we’re on the lookout for signs of deception, studies show, our accuracy
Humans are startlingly bad at detecting fraud. Even when we’re on the lookout for signs of deception, studies show, our accuracy
admin
2018-02-17
60
问题
Humans are startlingly bad at detecting fraud. Even when we’re on the lookout for signs of deception, studies show, our accuracy is hardly better than chance. Technology has opened the door to new and more pervasive forms of fraud: Americans lose an estimated $ 50 billion a year to con artists a-round the world, according to the Financial Fraud Research Center at Stanford University. But because computers aren’t subject to the foibles of emotion and what we like to call "intuition," they can also help protect us. Here’s how leading fraud researchers, neuroscientists, psychiatrists, and computer scientists think technology can be put to work to fight fraud however it occurs—in person, online, or over the phone.
Spam filters are supposed to block e-mail scams from ever reaching us, but criminals have learned to circumvent them by personalizing their notes with information gleaned from the Internet and by grooming victims over time.
In response, a company called ZapFraud is turning to natural-language analytics; Instead of flagging key words, it looks for narrative patterns symptomatic of fraud. For instance, a message could contain a statement of surprise, the mention of a sum of money, and a call to action. "Those are the hallmark expressions of one particular fraud e-mail," Markus Jakobsson, the company’s founder, told me. "There’s a tremendous number of[spam]e-mails, but a small number of story lines. "
A similar approach could help combat fraud by flagging false statements on social media. Kalina Bontcheva, a computer scientist who researches natural-language processing at the University of Sheffield, in England, is leading a project that examines streams of social data to identify rumors and esti mate their veracity by analyzing the semantics, cross-referencing information with trusted sources, identifying the point of origin and pattern of dissemination, and the like. Bontcheva is part of a research collaboration which plans to flag misleading tweets and posts and classify them by severity: speculation, controversy, misinformation, or disinformation.
Natural-language analytics can do the followings except______.
选项
A、testifying
B、highlighting
C、categorizing
D、comparing
答案
A
解析
细节题。本题问“自然语言分析学能做以下的事情但除了……之外”。[A]尤指“出庭作证”不合题意。[B]“标记”;[C]“分类”;[D]“对比”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/PkBZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
TheArtsClassandtheScienceClassWriteanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthedrawing.Inyouressay,youshould1)
"Ofthepeople,bythepeople,andforthepeople."That’showAbrahamLincolndescribedtheAmericangovernmentinhisGettysbu
Niceguysknewit,nowtwostudieshaveconfirmedit:badboysgetthemostgirls.Thefindingmayhelpexplainwhyanastysuit
Parentsofchildrenwhohappilyeatwhat’sputinfrontofthemmightassumetheirkidsarewellnourished.Buttwonewstudies
【F1】Theevolutionofintelligenceamongearlylargemammalsofthegrasslandswasdueingreatmeasuretotheinteractionbetwee
Relativitytheoryhashadaprofoundinfluenceonourpictureofmatterbyforcingustomodifyourconceptofaparticleinan
Whatsortofglassyoudrinkfrompredictshowfastyoudrink."Wouldyoulikethatinastraightorajug,sir?"wasonceacom
Inthefollowingtext,somesentenceshavebeenremoved.ForQuestions41-45,choosethemostsuitableonefromthelistA-Gto
Itusedtobesostraightforward(直接的).Ateamofresearchersworkingtogetherinthelaboratorywouldsubmittheresultsofthe
随机试题
坚决打脱贫攻坚战就是要坚持()
辞去领导职务而不辞去公职,其直接结果是______。
脉象细数可见于
下列哪个药物不能用亚硝酸钠法进行测定
A.柴胡清肝饮B.大陷胸汤C.龙胆泻肝汤D.大柴胡汤E.乌梅汤针对胰腺炎蛔虫上扰证者,应选用()
最符合肝硬化腹水改变的是
模板拆除前必须()方可进行。模板拆除时应设置警戒线,做出明显标志,防止落物伤人,必须有专人监护。
国际上咨询工程师是搞()。
Aformertownhallworkermadelegalhistorylastweekwhenshewasawarded£67,000forstressbroughtonbyherwork.Theruling
Inarecentadvertisement,amajorcerealcompanycontendedthatthebettereducatedpeopleare,themorelikelyitisthatasc
最新回复
(
0
)