首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is w
admin
2011-06-29
42
问题
Think about what would make you really, really happy. More money? Wrong. Smiling, well-adjusted kids? Wrong again. The fact is we are terrible at predicting the source of joy. And whatever choices we do make, we likely later decide it was all for the best.
These are insights from happiness economics, perhaps the hottest field in what used to be called the dismal science. Happiness is everywhere--on the best-seller lists, in the minds of policymakers, and front and center for economists--yet it remains elusive. The golden role of economics has always been that well-being is a simple function of income. That’s why nations and people alike strive for higher incomes-money gives us choice and a measure of freedom. After a certain income can, we simply don’t get any happier. And it isn’t what we have, but whether we have more than our neighbor, that really matters. So the news last week that in 2006 top hedge-fund managers took home $ 240 million, minimum, probably didn’t make them any happier, it just made the rest of us less so.
Now policymakers are racing to figure out what makes people happy, and just how they should deliver it. Countries as diverse as Bhutan, Australia, China, Thailand and the U. IC are coming up with "happiness indexer," to be used alongside GDP as a guide to society’s progress. In Britain, the "politics of happiness" will likely figure prominently in next year’s elections. Never mind that the world’s top happiness researchers recently gathered at a conference in Rome to debate whether joy is even measurable.
Why is this all happening now? only in the last decade have economists, psychologists, biologists and philosophers begun cross-pollinating in such a way to arrive at "happiness studies". Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert humorously sums up much of the new wisdom in his book "Stumbling on Happiness". He says 24-hour television and the Internet have allowed us all to see more seemingly happy people than ever before. "We’re surrounded by the lifestyles of the rich and famous," says Gilbert, "rubbing our noses in the fact that others have more."
of course, the idea that money isn’t the real key to happiness isn’t new. The 18th-centry British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham argued that public policy should try to. maximize happiness, and many prominent economists agreed but could not quite embrace the idea. There was just no way to measure happiness objectively.
one of the early revelations of happiness research, from Richard Easterlin at the University of Southern
California, was that while the rich are typically happier than the poor, the happiness boost from extra cash isn’t that great once one rises above the poverty line. The reason, says Easterlin, is the "hedonic cycle": we get used to being richer dam quick, and take it for granted or compare it to what others have, not what we used to have. Tums out, keeping up with the Joneses is hard-wired into our brains, thanks to our pack-creature roots.
Though many happiness researchers say "work less, play more" is the formula for happiness, Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, suggests otherwise. Hard-working Americans ranks 17th on his list; the hard-vacationing French 39th. Human beings do want a European-style safety net, but also want freedom and opportunity.
And perhaps our intuitions about happiness should triumph over the fuzzy data, anyway. The economics of happiness has given us a couple of fairly hard and fast roles about well-being-being truly poor is bad, and time with friends and family are good. The good news is that whatever choices we make individually and as societies in the pursuit of happiness there’s good chance that they’ll seem better in hindsight. Yet another truism of happiness is that "we all wear rose-colored glasses when it comes to our past decision-making," says Gilbert. Today’s dreadful life choice will likely be tomorrow’s happy accident.
We are poor at prevision of the origin of hapiness, and we would probably believe the decision we made is the most satisfactory. The Happiness has become【16】everywhere but tough to define. Nations and people manage to gain higher incomes based on the principle of economics that【17】are related to hapiness, but that is not【18】.Wealth alone isn’t necessarily what makes us happy. It makes different if we possess more than【19】,and that’s why we feel unhappy to find those top【20】have superlative income. Some nations are beginning to consider issues like measuring society’s progress by【21】as well as GDP, and researchers held seminar to exchange surveys about the【22】,though the influential topic was advanced 10 years ago. The issue that a state policy should be【23】the happiness of the majority, erupted many decades ago by British Enlightenment thinker Jeremy Bentham and accepted by many eminent economists, could not fairly【24】,because happiness can not be objectively measured. The【25】of the happiness made by Richard Easterlin is that the wealth makes people happier, but their happiness will not【26】as great as it should be if they live above the【27】.The can easily take the life for granted and【28】the more expansive way of life. They are【29】to compare the life with others and manage to keep up with the Joneses. Ruut Veenhoven, a professor at Erasmus University in Rotterdam, does not support the【30】"work less, play more". According to his investigation of happiness list, people want a Europen-style 【31】and want to enjoy freedom and opportunity as well. We should probably go beyond the confusing information and 【32】the fairly principles of the happiness: poverty is 【33】,staying with friends and family is 【34】,and the decisions made 【35】are by chance to be happy experience.
选项
答案
C
解析
此空格应该是Richard Easterlin对幸福做的初步解释。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Pw6O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
ConfirmationofFollow-upafterBusinessMeetingThisisfurthertoourmeetingoflastweekatwhichweagreedtoholdase
John,I’mafraidafewdetailsarestillmissinginyourexpensesform.Whydidyouleaveonthe14ththismonth?Didyougoby
SprintWantsYourIPhoneRememberthemapwarsbetweenAT&TWirelessandVerizonWireless?SprintNextelthoughtitlookedl
Readthefollowingadvertisementofajob.Foreachquestion(23-28)ontheoppositepage,choosethecorrectanswer.Ma
WhenhelivedinTibetin1950s,radiowastheonlymeanshehadtokeep______ofcurrenteventsinthecountry.
RecentreformeffortsAhavebeenfocusedonencouraginglifelongorrecurrenteducationtomeetBchangingindividualandsocial
Inspiteofthewiderangeofreadingmaterialspeciallydesignedor______forlanguagelearningpurposes,thereisyetnoeffe
Computersarepermeatingalmosteveryaspectofourlives,includingmanyareaspreviouslyuntouchedbytechnology.【B1】Butunl
Ahalfhourbeforetesttime,Iwasafraidtolookinthemirror.ButIhadtoassessthedamages.Afterall,therewerecutegu
Therocksareverybigwith______ofcolorsonthem.
随机试题
理想电流源的外接负载电阻越大,它的端电压【】
A、1日常用量B、3日常用量C、1次常用量D、7日常用量E、2日极量阿普唑仑片的处方限量为
诊断子宫内膜异位无帮助的是
证券投资基金的发展趋势之一是从封闭式基金为主向以开放式基金为主。()
A公司年初投资资本1000万元,预计今后每年可取得税前经营利润800万元,所得税税率为25%,第一年的净投资为100万元,以后每年净投资为零,加权平均资本成本为8%,则企业实体价值为()万元。
运动饮料摄入的适宜温度为()。[辽宁省2009年11月三级真题]
①雾鬓云鬟,使我想起了古时候的美人②我很喜欢这茶馆,无事时泡一杯“菊花”坐上一两个钟头,再要点糖渍核桃仁来嚼嚼.也颇有意思③尤其是在烟雨迷离的时候,白雾横江.远山也都看不清楚了④这时“么师”(茶房)就轻轻地吹起了萧,声音很低,
设A为2阶矩阵,P=(a,Aa),其中a是非零向量且不是A的特征向量.证明P为可逆矩阵.
以下叙述中,不属于面向对象方法的优点的是______。
CurrentChallengesConfrontingU.S.HigherEducationThefirstchallenge:forceofthemarketplace•Currentsituation:—pr
最新回复
(
0
)