首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant group
admin
2018-06-06
56
问题
Everyone seems to hate America’s latest stab at immigration reform, which went before the full Senate this week. Immigrant groups think it offers little hope to low-skilled, mostly Hispanic would-be migrants. Right-wingers snarl that it is nothing but an "amnesty" for illegals. Companies, who it had been hoped would support the new compromise, hate it because it imposes bureaucratic burdens on employers. And the left is complaining because it fears it will depress low-end wages. It would be nice to be able to report that opposition across so full a spectrum is a sign that the bill is a well-crafted compromise. In fact, it may well turn out to be doomed.
That would be a pity, because there are some good things in the proposal. Most important, it produces a reasonably fair solution to the problem of what to do about the 12 million or so illegal immigrants already in America, most of them working hard at low-paid and disagreeable jobs. Deporting a population the size of Ohio’s is impossible, economically illiterate and morally wrong. The new bill would make the 12 million legal, and offer them a path, though a winding one, to full citizenship.
The right doesn’t like this, of course, and points out that amnesties(which this really isn’t, given the fines and hurdles involved)have in the past drawn fresh waves of migrants. So the other side of the bargain gives conservatives everything they could wish for in terms of razor-wired fences, surveillance drones, armed border guards and a programme that will force companies to check the legality of their workers. Such measures are probably necessary to win support and rebuild trust in the immigration system. No bill would pass without them.
The bad part of the deal is what happens to would-be immigrants once all those sensors and spy-planes are in place. The bill proposes a dual system. A guest-worker programme would allow 400,000 people a year to enter the country to work for two years, after which they must go home for a year, with a six-year cap on the total time they can spend in America. The other part is a new method of granting residence permits, carrying the right to work. Such "green cards" currently go mostly to relatives of American citizens or to people sponsored by an employer. The bill would bring in a "points" system for 380,000 people a year, similar to those in use in Canada and Australia. Permits for family members would be restricted, to cover only spouses and young children. Employers would have less ability to sponsor the people they need.
There are several problems. One is that extended families help build vibrant communities in a way that guest workers don’t. Second, the government should not be in the business of telling companies whom they ought to hire. There are ways round this, such as awarding points not for specific jobs, but still the problem is that most of the green cards will be used up by Indian software designers, Bosnian engineers or the similarly blessed. America does indeed need such folk, but it also needs legions of the less-skilled, too.
That will continue to mean a large, poorly paid and constantly rotating alien underclass with little stake in American society. On May 23rd, the Senate voted to scale the guest worker programme back to 200,000. So the illegals will keep coming—except that now their journey will be still more dangerous and they will be even further beyond the law. The current bill is better than nothing: but unless it is improved, it will not solve the main problem of the illegals.
What does the word "amnesty"(Para. 1)mean?
选项
A、Favorable policy.
B、Solution.
C、Obstacle.
D、Key initiative.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/QoSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI中级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI中级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
ThehappiestpeopleintheworldmayliveinScandinavia,anewstudysuggests.That’saccordingtotheUnitedNationsGeneralA
Chinaisthetopsourcecountryofinternationalstudentsintheworld.Recentstatisticshaveshowna【C1】______trendforChine
OntheInternet,adsarearealproblem.They’reaproblemforus,thepeople,andnotjustbecausetheyclutterupourWebpage
Tosavemoneyonthecompanion’sfare,therescuecenters______helpfromvacationersalreadyholdingaplanetickethome.
Declininghouseprices,risingjoblayoffs,skyrocketingoilcostsandamajorcreditcrunchhavebroughtconsumerconfidenceto
Workersandconsumershaveadirectinterestindevelopinglaborprocessesthatwillnotdestroythehealthofthosedirectlyin
Thelackofadequatehousing,especiallyinprosperousurbancenters,ledtoastagnantjobmarket.
MycompanyisExcellentKitchenwareCompany,therenearbyisabigmarketforkitchenwareinourcity.
核安全核能自诞生之日起,对人类的经济社会产生了积极作用。但人们也看到,核能应用存在巨大风险。福岛核泄漏事故后,一些国家开始限制和放弃核能的开发和使用。而中国的立场是,在接下来相当长的时期内,核能仍是我们确保能源安全,保障经济社会发展,应
Eachsummer,nomatterhowpressingmyworkschedule,Itakeoffonedayexclusivelyformyson.Wecallitdad-sonday.Thisye
随机试题
AMI患者半夜突然出现呼吸困难,咯粉红色泡沫痰,第一心音减弱,舒张期奔马律,心尖可闻及2级收缩期杂音。该患者诊断
下达毒性药品年度生产、收购、供应和配制计划的部门是()。
甲企业为创业投资企业,2014年2月采取股权投资方式向乙公司(未上市的中小高新技术企业)投资300万元,至2016年12月31日仍持有该股权。甲企业2016年在未享受股权投资应纳税所得额抵扣的税收优惠政策前的企业所得税应纳税所得额为2000万元。已知企业所
国内安全保卫,是对()的侦查和防范工作。
甲、乙两个工程队共同完成A和B两个项目。已知甲队单独完成A项目需13天,单独完成B项目需7天;乙队单独完成A项目需11天,单独完成B项目需9天。如果两队合作用最短的时间完成两个项目,则最后一天两队需要共同工作多长时间就可以完成任务?()
使用VC++2010打开考生文件夹下prog1中的解决方案。此解决方案的项目中包含一个源程序文件prog1.c。在此程序中,编写函数fun,其功能是:根据以下公式求P的值,结果由函数值带回。m与n为两个正整数且要求m>n。例如:m=12,n=8时,运行
Americanstodayhavedifferenteatinghabitsthantheyhadinthepast.Thereisawide【C1】______offoodavailable.Theyhave
A、admiringB、respectfulC、disapprovingD、understandingC
Itisimpliedbutnotstatedthatancientnavigationusedtosail______.Whichofthefollowingisnottrueaccordingtothe
A、hedidn’tworkashardashewassupposedto.B、Hedidn’tpassthephysicsexam.C、Hedidbetterinanearlierexam.D、hefoun
最新回复
(
0
)