首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a
admin
2013-08-05
36
问题
A couple of years ago a group of management scholars from Yale and the University of Pittsburgh tried to discover if there was a link between a company’s success and the personality of its boss. To work out what that personality was, they asked senior managers to score their bosses for such traits as an ability to communicate an exciting vision of the future or to stand as a good model for others to follow. When the data were analyzed, the researchers found no evidence of a connection between how well a firm was doing and what its boss was like. As far as they could tell, a company could not be judged by its chief executive any better than a book could be judged by its cover.
A few years before this, however, a team of psychologists from Tufts University, led by Nalini Ambady, discovered that when people watched two-second-long film-clips of professors lecturing, they were pretty good at determining how able a teacher each professor actually was. At the end of the study, the perceptions generated by those who had watched only the clips were found to match those of students taught by those self-same professors for a full semester.
Now, Dr Ambady and her colleague, Nicholas Rule, have taken things a step further. They have shown that even a still photograph can convey a lot of information about competence— and that it can do so in a way which suggests the assessments of all those senior managers were poppycock.
Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule showed 100 undergraduates the faces of the chief executives of the top 25 and the bottom 25 companies in the Fortune 1,000 list. Half the students were asked how good they thought the person they were looking at would be at leading a company and half were asked to rate five personality traits on the basis of the photograph. These traits were competence, dominance, likeability, facial maturity (in other words, did the individual have an adult-looking face or a baby-face) and trustworthiness.
By a useful (though hardly unexpected) coincidence, all the businessmen were male and all were white, so there were no confounding variables of race or sex. The study even controlled for age, the emotional expression in the photos and the physical attractiveness of the individuals by obtaining separate ratings of these from other students and using statistical techniques to remove their effects.
This may sound like voodoo. Psychologists spent much of the 20th century denigrating the work of 19th-century physiognomists and phrenologists who thought the shapes of faces and skulls carry information about personality. However, recent work has shown that such traits can, indeed, be assessed from photographs of faces with a reasonable accuracy.
And Dr Ambady and Mr. Rule were surprised by just how accurate the students’ observations were. The results of their study, which are about to be published in Psychological Science, show that both the students’ assessments of the leadership potential of the bosses and their ratings for the traits of competence, dominance and facial maturity were significantly related to a company’s profits. Moreover, the researchers discovered that these two connections were independent of each other. When they controlled for the "power" traits, they still found the link between perceived leadership and profit, and when they controlled for leadership they still found the link between profit and power.
These findings suggest that instant judgments by the ignorant (nobody even recognized Warren Buffett) are more accurate than assessments made by well-informed professionals. It looks as if knowing a chief executive disrupts the ability to judge his performance.
Sadly, the characteristics of likeability and trustworthiness appear to have no link to company profits, suggesting that when it comes to business success, being warm and fuzzy does not matter much (though these traits are not harmful). But this result also suggests yet another thing that stock market analysts might care to take into account when preparing their reports: the physiognomy of the chief executive.
The author will most probably agree on the idea that
选项
A、there is no connection between physiognomy and personality.
B、people can assess the personality traits on the basis of photograph.
C、workers’ personality traits are related to the company’s profit.
D、a baby-face looking is good to the company’s success.
答案
B
解析
第6段最后一句提到,最近的研究表明such traits可以相当准确地从面部照片估计。而such traits指的是前一句中提到的personality,因此B项符合原文,也就是作者最可能认同的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/R74O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTincludedintheGreatLakes?
Ste.GenevieveisknownforthefollowingEXCEPT
AccordingtoDr.Adams,whatdoesthetitleofhisbooksuggest?
AccordingtoDr.Adams,whatdoesthetitleofhisbooksuggest?
WhichofthefollowingisCORRECTabouttheaccident?
Therearemanyacareerinwhichtheincreasingemphasisis(1)______inspecialization.Youfindthesecareersinengineering,
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandinAsia,dinosaurfossilsarenowbeingdiscoveredonallsevencont
Shortsharptermsmakebigpointsclear.Butpeopleoftenprefertosoftentheirspeechwitheuphemism:amixtureofabstraction
A、Americanspreparemorepointsbeforenegotiations.B、Americansaremorestraightforwardduringnegotiations.C、Brazilianspref
夜是安静的,然而也是生动的。狗儿活跃起来了,它们悄然无声地沿着院子围墙跑着,不时地停下来支支耳朵,细察来自远近的一切动静,履行保卫主人的职责。鼠儿活跃起来了.不放过任何机会往窝里拉拽着大意的人们没有安放好的食物,尽量避免发出任何声响。猫儿也活跃起来了,它们
随机试题
美国学者卡特赖特和詹德在《团体动力学》一书中提出了
患者,男性,28岁,右前臂刀割伤,检查发现垂腕畸形,掌指关节不能主动伸直。最可能损伤的是
Barret食管是指下列哪一种
患者,男,36岁。已确诊为“白血病”1年,患者对自己的病情非常了解。患者喜欢独处,失眠时间增加,情感减退。其属于临终患者的阶段是
患者,男,53岁。心胸疼痛,痛如针刺,痛有定处,入夜为甚,甚则心痛彻背,背痛彻心,舌质暗红,有瘀斑,苔薄,脉弦涩。治疗选用
根据我国《海关法》中关于一般进出口货物申报地点的规定,在一般情况下()。
关于政府补助的会计处理,下列项目中正确的有()。
根据下列资料,回答下列问题。据国家统计局披露,2016年1—7月,新能源发电量增长19.2%。1—7月,新能源发电量占全部发电量的比重为8.8%,核电、风电和太阳能发电占全部发电量比重分别为3.45%、3.74%和0.64%,其中风电比上年同期提高0.
2012年11月29日,习近平总书记参观《复兴之路》展览后指出:“中华民族的昨天,可以说是‘雄关漫道真如铁’;中华民族的今天,正可谓‘人间正道是沧桑’;中华民族的明天,可以说是‘长风破浪会有时’。实现中华民族的伟大复兴就是中华民族近代最伟大的中国梦,是一项
以下关于极限测试的说法中,正确的是______。
最新回复
(
0
)