首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business. For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A,
admin
2013-08-22
29
问题
Read the following extract from an article about Over-Capacity in the Car Business.
For each question 15—20, mark one letter(A, B. C, or D)on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
Since the days of Henry Ford’s dominance of the car market in the 1920s up to the present day, the car industry has continued to grow. Some companies, such as British Leyland, failed to survive the turbulent business world of the 1970s despite being government-owned. During the 1960s and 1970s, as growth in profit became more difficult to achieve due to increased competition, mainly from the Japanese, the industry turned to efficient production methods in order to create a competitive advantage. However, once all the major players in the industry had become as efficient as possible, developing a cost advantage was more difficult to achieve. In addition, car companies from Asia, such as Daewoo, Samsung and Kia, have developed cheaper, more affordable alternatives for the discerning western buyers. Such car companies are part-funded by their respective governments but enjoy considerably lower labor costs.
Increasing productive capacity has led to car companies aiming to use economies of scale as the main way of reducing cost, although this has unfortunately led to businesses having surplus capacity. This spare capacity occurs when the industry as a whole expands ahead of, or in anticipation of, a growth in customer demand. Such growth in capacity has meant that supply outstrips demand by some 30% , i.e. , car companies could cut back on their capacity levels by 30%, and still meet all customer demands.
The result has been a series of joint agreements and mergers between car companies, with a view to either using capacity, or losing capacity altogether by selling off parts of a business. The other problem is the high cost of developing new vehicles: the standard response to the high cost is to either rejuvenate or re-launch old vehicles with new technology. But there are enough companies developing new models that any business, which does not, stands to lose out. The main fear in the car industry is over-capacity—experts predict that by 2001, the industry may produce 23 million cars more than it can sell!
In 1998 there was a spate of company mergers—e.g. In January 1999, Ford paid £4 billion for Volvo’s car division(Volvo claimed that it needed economies of scale, allowing it to focus on buses, engines and aerospace and to acquire shares in two major truck-making businesses. Ford intended to distribute Volvos with its own cars and hoped to use Volvo’s reputation for technological excellence to develop new cars, using common research platforms to save money.
Renault, on the other hand, announced a joint agreement with Nissan, the debt-ridden Japanese company, to purchase a 37% stake. For Renault, the problem was not over-capacity, but rather the lack of product range. Renault was 44% owned by the French government, which obviously wanted to protect one of its major companies and wealth creators. However, Renault had concentrated its major marketing effort on domestic demand in Francejas the domestic market fell, profit tumbled. The expiry in 1999 of the "gentlemen’s agreement" which limited car sales from Japan was probably the main reason for teaming up with Nissan. Nissan, however, had borrowed approximately £ 15 billion in order to expand its productive capacity and had lost money in six of the last seven years. One estimate put 1998’s losses at nearly £ 1 billion. The cost savings for both companies are not likely to occur until 2002, resulting mainly from purchasing economies of scale. Renault seems to have got caught between the large manufacturers who achieve economies of scale and the smaller specialist manufacturers.
What was the problem for Renault?
选项
A、It had the problem of over-capacity.
B、It had the problem of the lack of product range.
C、It was debt-ridden.
D、As domestic market fell, profit tumbled.
答案
B
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SC7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Technology:theimportanceoftrainingstaffinhowto
(Thecandidatechoosesonetopicandspeaksaboutitforoneminute.)A.Careerdevelopment:theimportanceofacquiringarange
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
Practisediscussingthistask,andthequestionswhichfollowit,withapartner:STAFFTRAININGREVIEWTheorganisationyouwor
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
•Youwillhearadiscussionbetweentwoseniormanagers,JohnandDeborah,aboutanassistantmanager,Colin,whohasappliedf
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
TaskOne-Job•Forquestions13-17,matchtheextractswiththepeople,listedA-H.•Foreachextract,choosethejobeachsp
•Readthetextbelowaboutthelogistics.•Inmostofthelines41-52thereisoneextraword.Itiseithergrammaticallyinco
随机试题
关于子宫的描述正确的是
甲与乙分别出资60万元和240万元共同设立新雨开发有限公司(下称新雨公司),由乙任执行董事并负责公司经营管理,甲任监事。乙同时为其个人投资的东风有限责任公司(下称东风公司)的总经理,该公司欠白云公司货款50万元未还。乙与白云公司达成协议约定:若3个月后仍不
公平理论认为,员工的工作动机,不仅仅受到他们所得的相对报酬的影响,更重要的是受到绝对报酬的影响。()
美国次级贷款危机已经演变成了一场全球金融危机和经济危机。在此背景下,全球证券市场的发展呈现出()等趋势。
按照职业操守准则规定,符合公平对待客户的是()。
(2014年)关于制定劳动规章制度的说法,正确的是()。
关于调查表的填写,下列说法错误的是
2005年6月29日,陈某因犯诬告陷害罪被人民法院判处有期徒刑2年,缓刑3年。2008年3月5日,陈某又犯诈骗罪。对于陈某的量刑,下列表述哪些是错误的?()
学生和课程的关系模式定义为s(S#,Sn,Sd,Dc,SA)(其属性分别为学号、姓名、所在系、所在系的系主任、年龄);C(C#,Cn,P#)(其属性分别为课程号、课程名、先选课);SC(S#,C#,G)(其属性分别学号、课程号和成绩)。关系中包含对
在声音的数字化过程中,采样时间、采样频率、量化位数和声道数都相同的情况下,所占存储空间最大的声音文件格式是()。
最新回复
(
0
)