首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Without fanfare or legislation, the government is orchestrating a quiet revolution in how it regulates new medicines. The revolu
Without fanfare or legislation, the government is orchestrating a quiet revolution in how it regulates new medicines. The revolu
admin
2013-11-29
58
问题
Without fanfare or legislation, the government is orchestrating a quiet revolution in how it regulates new medicines. The revolution is based on the idea that the sicker people are, the more freedom they should have to try drugs that are not yet fully tested. For fifty years government policy has been driven by another idea: the fear that insufficiently tested medicines could cause deaths and injuries. The urgent needs of people infected with HIV, the AIDS virus, and the possibility of meeting them with new drugs have created a compelling countervailing force to the continuing concern with safety. As a result, government rules and practices have begun to change. Each step is controversial. But the shift has already gone far beyond AIDS. New ways are emerging for very sick people to try some experimental drugs before they are marketed. People with the most serious forms of heart disease, cancer, emphysema, Alzheimer’ s or Parkinson’ s disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, diabetes, or other grave illnesses can request such drugs through their doctors and are likelier to get them than they would have been four years ago. "We’ve been too rigid in not making lifesaving drugs available to people who otherwise face certain death," says Representative Henry Waxman, of California, who heads the subcommittee that considers changes in drug-approval policies. "It’s true of AIDS, but it’s also true of cancer and other life- threatening diseases."
For the first time, desperate patients have become a potent political force for making new medicines available quickly. People with AIDS and their advocates, younger and angrier than most heart-disease or cancer patients, are drawing on two decades of gay activists’ success in organizing to get what they want from politicians. At times they found themselves allied with Reagan Administration deregulators, scientists, industry representatives, FDA staff members, and sympathetic members of Congress. They organized their own clinical trials and searched out promising drugs here and abroad. The result is a familiar Washington story: a crisis—AIDS—helped crystallize an informal coalition for reform.
AIDS gave new power to old complaints. As early as the 1970s the drug industry and some independent authorities worried that the Food and Do, g Administration’ s testing requirements were so demanding that new drugs were being unreasonably delayed. Beginning in 1972, several studies indicated that the United States had lost its lead in marketing new medicines and that breakthrough drugs—those that show new promise in treating serious or life-threatening diseases— had come to be available much sooner in other countries. Two high-level commissions urged the early release of breakthrough drugs. So did the Carter Administration, but the legislation it pro- posed died in Congress. Complaints were compounded by growing concern that "if we didn’t streamline policies, red tape wot, Id be an obstacle to the development of the biotechnology revolution," as Frank E. Young, who was the head of the FDA from 1984 to 1989, put it in an interview with me.
Young was a key figure in the overhaul of the FDA’s policies. A pioneer in biotechnology and a former dean of the University of Rochester’s medical school, he came to Washington with an agenda and headed the agency for five and a half years—longer than anyone else has since the 1960s. Young took the FDA job to help introduce new medicines created by biotechnology-- whose promise he had seen in his own gene-cloning lab--and to get experimental medicines to desperately iii people more quickly. He had seen people die waiting for new medicines because "they were in the wrong place at the wrong time," he said. That is now changing.
Which of the following has the direct power over the approval of new prescription drugs?
选项
A、President.
B、Congress.
C、Senate.
D、The Food and Drug Administration.
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/SHhO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
AmericaLosesaGreatPublicThinkerArthurMiller’sdeathlastweekmeantmorethanthelossofanoutstandingplaywright.
Thelawofprivateinternationaltribunalswithrespecttoconflictsofinterestofarbitratorsisquiteextensive,albeitbyno
Islanguage,likefood,abasichumanneedwithoutwhichachildatacriticalperiodoflifecanbestarvedanddamaged?Judgin
Variousinnovationshavebeenintroducedaswaystobreakoffoursystemwhichforcesstudentsthroughaseriesofidenticalcla
Whenitcomestotheslowingeconomy,EllenSpiroisn’tbitinghernailsjustyet.Butthe47-year-oldmanicuristisn’tcutting,
Whenitcomestotheslowingeconomy,EllenSpiroisn’tbitinghernailsjustyet.Butthe47-year-oldmanicuristisn’tcutting,
Governmenthastraditionallybeenevaluatedintermsoftheireffectsinpromotingseveralprinciples.Wehaveseenthatoneof
Itis3A.M.everythingontheuniversitycampusseemsghostlikeinthequiet,mistydarkness-everythingexceptthecomputerce
Thedramacritic,ontheotherhand,hasnosuchadvantage.Hecannotbeselective;hemustcovereverythingthatisofferedfor
随机试题
下列情形中,可能因密切关系导致不利影响的有()。
某公司出售了其手机制造业务,将注意力聚焦在网络、电子地图业务以及技术开发三大领域。该公司采取的战略是()。
A.丙氨酸-葡萄糖循环B.柠檬酸-丙酮酸循环C.三羧酸循环D.鸟氨酸循环为机体合成脂肪酸提供NADPH
26岁初产妇,足月顺产,新生儿体重3900g。产后30分钟阴道流血400ml。挤压子宫有断续出血,时多时少,测血压1219.3kPa(90/70mmHg),脉搏108次/分。针对出血原因,立即应作的主要检查是
切除子宫做病理检查,光镜下见子宫壁深肌层内有大量异型的滋养层细胞浸润,并有绒毛结构,应诊断为( )。
不需要佩带安全带的作业是()。
债券预期的到期收益率与具有相同期限和票面利率的无风险债券的到期收益率之间的差额,称为()。
在新疆恐龙发掘现场,专家预言:可能发现恐龙头骨。以下哪个命题和专家意思相同?
趋同进化:指不同生物物种在进化过程中由于适应相似的环境而呈现出外形上的相似性。下列属于趋同进化的是()。
Theproblemisthatthelossofconfidenceamongthesoldierscanbehighlycontagious.
最新回复
(
0
)