首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World? [A]If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about g
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World? [A]If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about g
admin
2014-08-28
25
问题
Genetically Modified Foods—Feed the World?
[A]If you want to spark a heated debate at a dinner party, bring up the topic about genetically modified foods. For many people, the concept of genetically altered, high-tech crop production raises all kinds of environmental, health, safety and ethical questions. Particularly in countries with long agrarian traditions—and vocal green lobbies—the idea seems against nature.
[B]In fact, genetically modified foods are already very much a part of our lives. A third of the corn and more than half the soybeans and cotton grown in the U. S. last year were the product of biotechnology, according to the Department of Agriculture. More than 65 million acres of genetically modified crops will be planted in the U. S. this year. The genetic is out of the bottle.
[C]Yet there are clearly some very real issues that need to be resolved. Like any new product entering the food chain, genetically modified foods must be subjected to rigorous testing. In wealthy countries, the debate about biotech is tempered by the fact that we have a rich array of foods to choose from—and a supply that far exceeds our needs. In developing countries desperate to feed fast-growing and underfed populations, the issue is simpler and much more urgent: Do the benefits of biotech outweigh the risks?
[D]The statistics on population growth and hunger are disturbing. Last year the world’s population reached 6 billion. And by 2050, the UN estimates, it will be probably near 9 billion. Almost all that growth will occur in developing countries. At the same time, the world’s available cultivable land per person is declining. Arable land has declined steadily since 1960 and will decrease by half over the next 50 years, according to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-Biotech Applications(ISAAA).
How can biotech help?
[E]Biotechnologists have developed genetically modified rice that is fortified with beta-carotene(β-胡萝卜素)—which the body converts into vitamin A—and additional iron, and they are working on other kinds of nutritionally improved crops. Biotech can also improve farming productivity in places where food shortages are caused by crop damage attribution to pests, drought, poor soil and crop viruses, bacteria or fungi(真菌).
[F]Damage caused by pests is incredible. The European corn borer, for example, destroys 40 million tons of the world’s corn crops annually, about 7% of the total. Incorporating pest-resistant genes into seeds can help restore the balance. In trials of pest-resistant cotton in Africa, yields have increased significantly. So far, fears that genetically modified, pest-resistant crops might kill good insects as well as bad appear unfounded.
[G]Viruses often cause massive failure in staple crops in developing countries. Two years ago, Africa lost more than half its cassava(树薯)crop—a key source of calories—to the mosaic virus(花叶病毒). Genetically modified, virus-resistant crops can reduce that damage, as can drought-tolerant seeds in regions where water shortages limit the amount of land under cultivation. Biotech can also help solve the problem of soil that contains excess aluminum, which can damage roots and cause many staple-crop failures. A gene that helps neutralize aluminum toxicity(毒性)in rice has been identified. Many scientists believe biotech could raise overall crop productivity in developing countries as much as 25% and help prevent the loss of those crops after they are harvested.
[H]Yet for all that promise, biotech is far from being the whole answer. In developing countries, lost crops are only one cause of hunger. Poverty plays the largest role. Today more than 1 billion people around the globe live on less than 1 dollar a day. Making genetically modified crops available will not reduce hunger if farmers cannot afford to grow them or if the local population cannot afford to buy the food those farmers produce.
[I]Biotech has its own "distribution" problems. Private-sector biotech companies in the rich countries carry out much of the leading-edge research on genetically modified crops. Their products are often too costly for poor farmers in the developing world, and many of those products won’t even reach the regions where they are most needed. Biotech firms have a strong financial incentive to target rich markets first in order to help them rapidly recoup the high costs of product development. But some of these companies are responding to needs of poor countries.
[J]More and more biotech research is being carried out in developing countries. But to increase the impact of genetic research on the food production of those countries, there is a need for better collaboration between government agencies—both local and in developed countries—and private biotech firms. The ISAAA, for example, is successfully partnering with the U. S. Agency for International Development, local researches and private biotech companies to find and deliver biotech solutions for farmers in developing countries.
Will "Franken-foods" feed the world?
[K]Biotech is not a panacea(灵丹妙药), but it does promise to transform agriculture in many developing countries. If that promise is not fulfilled, the real losers will be their people, who could suffer for years to come.
[L]The world seems increasingly to have been divided into those who favor genetically modified foods and those who fear them. Advocates assert that growing genetically altered crops can be kinder to the environment and that eating foods from those plants is perfectly safe. And, they say, genetic engineering—which can induce plants to grow in poor soils or to produce more nutritious foods—will soon become an essential tool for helping to feed the world’s burgeoning(迅速发展的)population. Skeptics contend that genetically modified crops could pose unique risks to the environment and to health—risks too troubling to accept placidly. Taking that view, many European countries are restricting the cultivation and importation of genetically modified agricultural products. Much of the debate are concerned about of safety. But what exactly does recent scientific research say about the hazards?
[M]Two years ago in Edinburgh, Scotland, eco-vandals stormed a field, crushing canola plants. Last year in Maine, midnight raiders hacked down more than 3,000 experimental poplar trees. And in San Diego, protesters smashed sorghum and sprayed paint over greenhouse walls. This far-flung outrage took aim at genetically modified crops. But the protests backfired: all the destroyed plants were conventionally bred. In each case, activists mistook ordinary plants for genetically modified varieties.
[N]It’s easy to understand why. In a way, genetically modified crops—now on some 109 million acres of farmland worldwide—are invisible. You can’t see, taste or touch a gene inserted into a plant or sense its effects on the environment. You can’t tell, just by looking, whether pollen containing a foreign gene can poison butterflies or fertilize plants miles away. That invisibility is precisely what worries people. How, exactly, will genetically modified crops affect the environment—and when will we notice? [O]Advocates of genetically modified or transgenic crops say the plants will benefit the environment by requiring fewer toxic pesticides than conventional crops. But critics fear the potential risks and wonder how big the benefits really are. "We have so many questions about these plants," remarks Guenther Stotzky, a soil microbiologist at New York University. "There’s a lot we don’t know and need to find out. "As genetically modified crops multiply in the landscape, unprecedented numbers of researchers have started fanning into the fields to get the missing information. Some of their recent findings are reassuring; others suggest a need for vigilance.
According to the UN’s prediction, the population growth from now to 2050 is nearly all in developing countries.
选项
答案
D
解析
[D]段主要讲述了世界人口的增长情况以及饥饿问题:人口增多,人均耕地面积减少,而大部分人口增长发生在发展中国家。题干中的prediction对应原文中的estimates,故选[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Tnm7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
NormanBorlaug:’FatheroftheGreenRevolution’Fewpeoplehavequietlychangedtheworldforthebettermorethanthisru
Welcome,Freshmen.HaveaniPod.Takingastepthatmanyprofessorsmayviewasabitcounterproductive,somecollegesandu
A、Visitadifferentstoreforasilkorcottonshirt.B、Getadiscountontheshirtsheisgoingtobuy.C、Lookforashirtofa
Somestudentsarenotadequatelypreparedforcollege.Shouldweturnthemaway?Deceivethem?Ormodifyourproduct?Americans
A、BecauseofthestrongFrenchinfluence.B、Becausetheysharedthesameroad.C、Becausetheybelongedtothesamecountry.D、Be
Inthe1980s,homeschoolingmadeacomebackintheU.S.whenreligiouslyconservativeparentsconvincedstatestoapproveandgi
TheBenefitsofJobInterviews1.面试是应聘过程中的一个至关重要的环节2.面试对招聘双方都有利3.为此,我们可以…
A、Designedvariousquestionnaires.B、Madesurveysinfactories.C、Madeanalysisonstatistics.D、Wrotereportsaboutproducts.A
AresearchpresentedtotheAAASmeetinginSanDiegosuggeststhatmuchoftheworldpreferstotakeasiesta(午睡).Ithasalrea
A、Shecannotfindahusbandforherself.B、Thefemalespiderislargerthanthemaleone.C、Thefemalespiderofteneatsherhus
随机试题
依据税法规定,应当计入应税所得额缴纳企业所得税的项目有()
60岁女性,既往有肠息肉病史,近2个月出现大便次数增多,门诊医生行直肠指诊无异常,查便潜血阴性,肿瘤标志物阴性,腹部超声无异常,最适宜的处置为()
一学生钱某以高热、头痛、颈项强直主诉入急诊室。体检提示脑膜炎。脑脊液检查表明是肺炎链球菌性脑膜炎。医师将诊断结果告诉了该学生,并建议住院用抗生素治疗,遭钱某拒绝。以下说法错误的是()
特殊经济区包括()。
甲公司与张某签订了3年期的劳动合同,在劳动合同中约定试用期满的月工资800元,甲公司所在地的最低月工资标准为750元。根据劳动合同法律制度的规定,张某在试用期的月工资不得低于()。
2008年5月,乔某和占某合作共同研制出一种太阳能集热器。同年7月中旬,占某到美国攻读博士学位。2008年8月2日,乔某以10万元的价格将该太阳能集热器专利申请权转让给王某。同月12日,王某以邮寄的方式向中国知识产权局提出了该太阳能集热器实用新型专利申请,
下列用年号来称呼皇帝的是()
自主学习、探究学习和合作学习的侧重点是一样的。
班集体形成的重要标志是成立了班委,健全了班级管理制度。()
地缘政治学是地理和政治的结合体,又称地理政治学。它关注地理学对国际政治的特征、历史、结构尤其是与他国关系的影响,把地理因素视为影响甚至决定国家对外政治决策的一个基本因素,并依据这些地理因素和政治格局的地域形成,分析预测世界或地区范围的战略形势及有关国家的政
最新回复
(
0
)