首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A New Approach to Debate I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】______【T1】______ II. Suggestions from Prof
A New Approach to Debate I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】______【T1】______ II. Suggestions from Prof
admin
2019-03-29
53
问题
A New Approach to Debate
I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】______【T1】______
II. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a)Begin with controlled practice: to【T2】______ opinions and arguments【T2】______
b)Caution: no【T3】______ topics【T3】______
III. "Discover Debate" Approach
- Team members: depending on the【T4】______ of students【T4】______
- The first stage: creating a【T5】______ aid【T5】______
- The second stage: presenting arguments
- The third stage: answering the【T6】______ argument【T6】______
a)Pause for the opponents to develop answers or【T7】______【T7】______
b)Evaluate arguments: to look for【T8】______【T8】______
c)Write easily remembered【T9】______【T9】______
- Ending: ask for audience【T10】______【T10】______
【T10】
A New Approach to Debate
Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency. But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power." However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities: they have 40 to 50 students. He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students. Each team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic. The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument. They have to do some talking, but not too much.
The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument. Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations. Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument. Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems. They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true, "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true. These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending. But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
feedback
解析
录音提到在整个辩论流程结束后,勒博先生会要求其他学生给正反两方投票谁输谁赢,询问观众的反馈能给这堂课画上圆满的句号,因此应填入feedback,表示“反馈”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UIRK777K
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Inanefforttosustaincommercialandrecreationalfishingforthenextseveraldecades,theUnitedStatesthisyearwillbecom
AccordingtotheAmericanCollegeHealthAssociation’smostrecentannualnationalsurvey,30percentofcollegestudentsreport
BecauseImarriedaphotographer,oncewehadchildren,ourholidaycardsofcoursebecamevehiclesfortheircutenessandhisc
Theinternationalspacestationisgettinganew,inflatableroomthatresemblesagiantsparetire,NASAannouncedonWednesday
Afast-foodrestaurantwithinabout500feetofaschoolmayleadtoatleasta5percentincreaseintheoverweightrateattha
A、Blood.B、Water.C、Insulin.D、Urine.C男士提到,身体机能需要糖,是胰岛素让身体使用糖(it’sinsulinthat…),由此可知本题选C项Insulin。
A、Positive.B、Neutral.C、Skeptical.D、Critical.C①选项都是表态度的形容词,问题应与此相关。②男士从一开始就对问卷调查提出质疑,最后他又说,不管怎么样,我不相信……。C项skeptical“怀疑的”与stil
A、Heavytrafficinthecity.B、Pollutioninthecitycenter.C、Theefficiencyofpublictransport.D、Thehighcostofbuildingc
Manyofyoursuggestionsare_____thenewplan.
A、Itismorecompetitivethanever.B、Itbecomesmoreandmorechallenging.C、Itisincreasinglysophisticated.D、Itisverygoo
随机试题
男,50岁,肝炎病史20年,肝区持续性疼痛3个月,伴乏力,消瘦、食欲减退,恶心,低热,黄疸,查体肋下腋前线可及肿大之肝脏,质硬。对诊断有确诊意义的是
急性颅内压增高的表现不包括
以下是不利于钙吸收的因素,除了
请认真阅读下列材料,并按要求作答。如指导中年段小学生学唱本歌曲,试拟定教学目标。
UKhouseholdsarecuttingbackonspendingatthefastestratesince1980.Thisiscontributingtotheworsteconomicslowdowni
根据《中华人民共和国地方各级人民代表大会和地方各级人民政府组织法》的规定,下列表述中错误的是()。
古代入看到龋齿的形态和被虫蚁啃噬后的木材很相似,他们推断,在口腔里有一种叫做“牙虫”的虫子,像白蚁啃噬木头那样侵蚀我们的牙齿。很可能是因为白蚁的危害曾经遍及全球,这一理论出现在所有的古代文明里,包括两河流域、古印度、古埃及以及古代中国。这段文字重在说明(
请根据提供的“ppt素材及设计要求.docx”要求文件来设计制作演示文稿,并以文件名“PowerPoint.pptx”存盘,具体要求如下:在幻灯片中突出显示“ppt素材及设计要求.docx”文件中重点内容(素材中加粗部分),包括字体、字号、颜色
He_______furiouslyatmewhenIcontradictedhim.
________________(尽管你的观点值得考虑),thecommitteefindsitunwisetoplacetoomuchimportanceonthem.
最新回复
(
0
)