首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-05-20
41
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere. For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight. About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income—about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding health-care sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
According to the passage, a big difference between the Bush proposal and the Schwarzenegger proposal is that ______.
选项
A、the latter hides the health-care costs
B、the former hides the health-care costs
C、the latter does better at controlling costs
D、the former does better at controlling costs
答案
A
解析
由第八段可知,布什提议与施瓦辛格提议的一个重要区别是,前者向人们揭示了健康的费用,使人们对该费用有一个清楚的认识,而后者虽然将费用转给了联邦政府、医生或医院,但却使人们对卫生保健产生幻想,认为其费用是低廉的。故A是正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/UP4O777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
Fewpeoplerealizethatgettingpregnantcanmeanlosingyourjob.Imagineawomanwho,sevenmonthsintoherpregnancy,isfir
AndwhentheMoonshoneintheheavenstheNightingaleflewtotheRose-tree,andsetherbreastagainstthethorn.Allnightlo
Statesarechompingatthebittogetafingerintotheonlinelearningpie.Assertingthattheyareonlyinterestedinensuring
Statesarechompingatthebittogetafingerintotheonlinelearningpie.Assertingthattheyareonlyinterestedinensuring
OnMay24,1976,theBritishwinemerchantStevenSpurrierorganizedablindtastingofFrenchandCalifornianwines.Spurrierw
Peoplebetweentheagesof______and70(65inScotland)whosenamesappearontheelectoralregister,withcertainexceptions,a
TheCatcherintheRye,writtenby______,showstheyoungster’srebellionsagainstthedubiousvaluesoftheadultworld.
London’sleisureindustryhopesforabonanzainJulyandAugust,thankstotheOlympics.Tolurehordesofvisitors,acampaign
随机试题
DZ喷墨系列打印机的库存问题DZ喷墨系列打印机于1988年上市,此后成了DZ最成功的产品之一,销量稳步上升,仅1990年就销售了60万台,约4亿美元。随着销售额的上升,库存也不断上升,导致DZ的配送中心货盘上放满了喷墨系列打印机。更糟糕的是,欧洲分
A.用大剂量雌激素止血后人工周期3个月B.孕、雄激素合并疗法减少月经量并调整月经周期C.用合成孕激素配合适量的雌激素口服D.孕激素长期应用E.于月经期前8~12天,肌注黄体酮10~20mg共5天治疗育龄期妇女经期延长
A.链霉素B.利福平C.乙胺丁醇D.对氨水杨酸钠E.口比嗪酰胺在治疗结核性脑膜炎时,通过血-脑屏障最好的药物是
半抗原是
空调系统服务于多个房间且要求各空调房间独立控制温度时,下列()系统不适用。
下列属于屋面分部工程子分部的有()。
下列关于债券成交原则的说法中,正确的是()。Ⅰ.价格优先就是证券公司按照交易最有利于投资委托人的利益的价格买进或卖出债券Ⅱ.时间优先就是要求在相同的价格申报时,应该与最早提出该价格的一方成交Ⅲ.价格优先就是要求在相同的价格申报时,应该与最早提
社会政策与社会工作之间的关系可以概括为( )的两个行动体系。
问λ为何值时,线性方程组有解,并求出解的一般形式.
Agoodtranslatorisbydefinitionbilingual.Theoppositeisnot【C1】______true,however.Abornandbredbilingualwillstill
最新回复
(
0
)