首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The President’s Cancer Panel is the Mount Everest of the medical mainstream, so it is astonishing to learn that it is poised to
The President’s Cancer Panel is the Mount Everest of the medical mainstream, so it is astonishing to learn that it is poised to
admin
2012-12-30
73
问题
The President’s Cancer Panel is the Mount Everest of the medical mainstream, so it is astonishing to learn that it is poised to join ranks with the organic food movement and declare:chemicals threaten our bodies. The cancer panel is releasing a landmark 200-page report, warning that our lackadaisical approach to regulation may have far-reaching consequences for our health.
I’ve read an advance copy of the report, and it’s an extraordinary document. It calls on America to rethink the way we confront cancer, including much more rigorous regulation of chemicals. Traditionally, we reduce cancer risks through regular doctor visits, self-examinations and screenings such as mammograms. The President’s Cancer Panel suggests other eye-opening steps as well, such as giving preference to organic food, checking radon levels in the home and microwaving food in glass containers rather than plastic. In particular, the report warns about exposures to chemicals during pregnancy, when risk of damage seems to be the greatest. Noting that 300 contaminants have been detected in umbilical cord blood of newborn babies, the study warns that:"to a disturbing extent, babies are born ’pre-polluted’."
It’s striking that this report emerges not from the fringe but from the mission control of mainstream scientific and medical thinking, the President’s Cancer Panel. Established in 1971, this is a group of three distinguished experts who review America’s cancer program and report directly to the President. One of the seats is now vacant, but the panel members who joined in this report are Dr. LaSalle Leffall Jr. , an oncologist and professor of surgery at Haward University, and Dr. Margaret Kripke, an immunologist at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston. Both were originally appointed to the panel by former President George W. Bush. "We wanted to let people know that we’re concerned, and that they should be concerned, " Professor Leffall told me.
The report blames weak laws, lax enforcement and fragmented authority, as well as the existing regulatory presumption that chemicals are safe unless strong evidence emerges to the contrary. "Only a few hundred of the more than 80, 000 chemicals in use in the United States have been tested for safety, " the report says. It adds:"Many known or suspected carcinogens are completely unregulated. "
Industry may howl. The food industry has already been fighting legislation in the Senate backed by Dianne Feinstein of California that would ban bisphenol-A, commonly found in plastics and better known as BPA.from food and beverage containers. Studies of BPA have raised alarm bells for decades, and the evidence is still complex and open to debate. That’s life: In the real world, regulatory decisions usually must be made with ambiguous and conflicting data. The Panel’s point is that we should be prudent in such situations, rather than recklessly approving chemicals of uncertain effect.
The President’s Cancer Panel report will give a boost to Senator Feinstein’s efforts. It may also help the prospects of the Safe Chemicals Act, backed by Senator Frank Lautenberg and several colleagues, to improve the safety of chemicals on the market. Some 41 percent of Americans will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives, and they include Democrats and Republicans alike. Protecting ourselves and our children from toxins should be an effort that both parties can get behind—-if enough members of Congress are willing to put the public interest ahead of corporate interests.
One reason for concern is that some cancers are becoming more common, particularly in children. We don’t know why that is, but the proliferation of chemicals in water, foods, air and household products is widely suspected as a factor. I’m hoping the President’s Cancer Panel report will shine a stronger spotlight on environmental causes of health problems—not only cancer, but perhaps also diabetes, obesity and autism.
The author’s attitude towards the report of the Cancer Panel is
选项
A、ambivalent.
B、admiring.
C、apathetic.
D、awesome.
答案
B
解析
态度题。由report定位至首段末句。a landmark 200-page report中的landmark意为“划时代的”。之后第二段第一句又出现了extraordinary一词。此外,该段第四句“The President’s CancerPanel suggests other eye-opening steps as well…”中出现了eye—opening,可见作者对该报告持肯定态度,大加赞扬,故[B]符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/V8aO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ThecapitalofCanadais______.
Itis______whoproposedLanguageAcquisitionDevice(LAD).
IntheUnitedStates,thereissomedisagreement(tosaytheleast)overtherisksandbenefits.ofnuclearpower.Therecanbe
Variationsamongstateinsurancelawscancauseproblemsforfamilies.Ifyoudoyour【M1】______homeworkbeforemovingtoanoth
Variationsamongstateinsurancelawscancauseproblemsforfamilies.Ifyoudoyour【M1】______homeworkbeforemovingtoanoth
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourown
"Ido."ToAmericansthosetwowordscarrygreatmeaning.Theycanevenchangeyourlife.Especiallyifyousaythematyourown
Inmanyclassroomsaroundthecountry,teachersareemphasizing,andperiodicallytesting,students’readingfluency,thecurren
Itishisnaturetoconferbenefits,butheisashamedtoreceivethem;fortheformeristhepartofasuperior,thelatterof
在法治和现代化建设上,新加坡堪称世界一流。用一个不太确切的比喻,新加坡真正达到了过去许多中国人梦寐以求的“中学为体、西学为用”的理想境界。这种境界应该是诞生华人先锋文化的理想土壤,但遗憾的是,新加坡的文化产品在全球华人社会中影响远不及香港和台湾地区,这里电
随机试题
在体循环和肺循环中,下列参数基本相同的是
A.唇内、鼻中、通关B.顺气、脾俞、食胀C.通窍、肺俞、苏气D.关元俞、带脉、后海E.尾尖、耳尖、山根治疗牛口疮、唇肿宜选
论述小儿麻、痘、斑、疹的第一部专著是
主要见于脑器质性精神病的情感障碍是
所有者权益主要特点是()。
下列发文字号中,书写不正确的是()
营养工作者应该对经济和文化发达地区、人群和个体给予更多的关注。()
某房地产公司自行建筑商品房出售,2010年8月有关经济业务如下:(1)建造职工住宅一栋,建造成本为485万元;(2)当月因某种原因将该栋职工住宅出售,取得收入800万元;(3)出租施工机械,取得租金收入10万元。该省规定的成本利润率为20%要求:
下列关于函数依赖的叙述中,不正确的是()。
Themostimportanttechnologicaleventofourtimeistheriseofthecomputer.Computersalready【B1】______manyaspectsofour
最新回复
(
0
)