首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
43
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
What function does the first sentence in the second paragraph serve?
选项
A、It further explains the theory of utilitarianism.
B、It forms a contrast to general cases of utilitarianism.
C、It acts as the connecting link to bring up the theme.
D、It gives an example to explain utilitarianism in particular cases.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
There’sadirtylittleSecretinmanyAmericanhomes--couplesfightaboutthehousework.It’sNo.1issuemyhusbandandIargue
Cultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandwe【1】______insom
______isanAmericanpoetwhosegreatworkLeavesofGrasswritteninunconventionalmeterandrhyme,celebratestheself,deat
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
Recently,therehasbeenahotdebateaboutwhetherweChinesepeopleshouldbringbackthetraditionalChinesecharacters.Weh
Waldenwaswrittenby
______istherepresentativeworkoftheLostGeneration.
______,whohelpedspearheadingthenewschoolofpoetryknownasImagism,isoneofthemostinfluentialAmericanpoetsofthe
高等教育在过去几十年的急速扩展是由强大的经济、社会和政治力量所驱动的。大家都认识到高等教育是对人力资本的重要投资,对经济增长影响深远。在经济全球一体化的情况下,很多国家的政府因为要快速推动经济增长和增强竞争力,都愿意投资高等教育。除了经济上的考虑外,社会和
随机试题
下列不属于大承气汤主治范围的是
根据《医疗机构制剂配制质量管理规范(试行)》,洁净室(区)应定期检测并记录()
设置操作权限。
下列有关存货会计处理的表述中,正确的有()。
2015年2月3日,甲公司以银行存款2003万元(其中含相关交易费用3万元)从二级市场购入乙公司股票100万元股,作为交易性金融资产核算。2015年7月10日,甲公司收到乙公司于当年5月25日宣告分派的现金股利40万元,2015年12月31日,上述股票的公
题于应县木塔第三层塔门上的对联是()。
看见路上的垃圾后绕道走开,这种行为是()。
(2013年真题)2000年3月1日,甲因犯盗窃罪被公安机关立案侦查后逃往外地。甲又因在2009年9月7日犯抢劫罪,于2010年6月7日被抓获。甲所犯盗窃罪的追诉期限()。
“墙上芦苇,头重脚轻根底浅;山间竹笋,嘴尖皮厚腹中空。”毛泽东在延安整风运动期间用这副对联形象地讽刺了()
Forgetmilkydrinks,hotwaterbottlesorcurlingupwithagoodbook.Therealsecrettoagoodnight’ssleepmaybewhereyou
最新回复
(
0
)