首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
46
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
What function does the first sentence in the second paragraph serve?
选项
A、It further explains the theory of utilitarianism.
B、It forms a contrast to general cases of utilitarianism.
C、It acts as the connecting link to bring up the theme.
D、It gives an example to explain utilitarianism in particular cases.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisNOTMarkTwain’sworks?
Gulliver’sTravelswaswrittenby______.
TheofficiallanguagesofNewZealandareEnglishand
InWesternCulturesyoudon’topenacloseddoorwithoutknocking,unlessitisyourownoroneclearlyinapublicplace.Or【M1
Languagelearningbeginswithlistening.Individualchildrenvarygreatlywiththeamountoflisteningtheydobeforetheystart
ThelargestcityintheUnitedStatesis
OnMay13,1940,WinstonChurchill,thenewlyappointedBritishPrimeMinister,gavehisfirstspeechtoParliament.Hewasprep
Inthe1990s,MicrosoftInternetExplorerbattledNetscapeNavigatorinthegreatWebbrowserwars.Inthe2000s,GoogleandYah
书籍到了我的手里,我的习惯是先看序文,次看目录。页数不多的往往立刻通读,篇幅大的,只把正文任择一二章节略加翻阅,就插在书架上。除小说外,我少有全体读完的大部的书,只凭了购入当时的记忆,知道某册书是何种性质,其中大概有些什么可取的材料而已。什么书在什么时候再
TheyhelpedfleeingRomansevadeAttilatheHunandheldaglitteringcityaloftformorethan1,500years.Butthewoodenpilin
随机试题
简述驱动系统的类型。
电路原理图:
结婚必须到县级以上政府婚姻登记机关登记,否则不成立夫妻关系。()
噪声聋在病变性质上属哪种类型
患者,女,40岁。失眠3年余,面唇淡白无华,失眠多梦,心悸健忘,月经量少,舌淡白,苔薄白,脉细无力。其证候是
表面紫红色,有多数不规则的深皱纹,剖面边缘向内卷曲的药材为
下列有关民事权利的说法中,正确的有()。
为什么说贯彻落实科学发展观的核心是以人为本?(5分)
2013年12月15日上午,张某因工作问题与李某发生矛盾,李某一怒之下抡起手里的盛满开水的铁网暖瓶打向张某,暖瓶打到张某后瓶塞飞出,暖瓶里的开水洒到了张某的脖子上,导致张某颈部局部烫伤。张某立即向附近的县公安局报警,县公安局民警立即赶赴现场,着手调查此案。
MD5算法的特点是以任意长度的报文作为输入,产生一个(29)bit的报文作为输出,输入是按照512bit的分组进行处理的。
最新回复
(
0
)