首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
26
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
What function does the first sentence in the second paragraph serve?
选项
A、It further explains the theory of utilitarianism.
B、It forms a contrast to general cases of utilitarianism.
C、It acts as the connecting link to bring up the theme.
D、It gives an example to explain utilitarianism in particular cases.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheAmericanWay:FreedomTheheartoftheAmericancalendarisJuly4.Americanshavecelebratedthisdateas"Independence
There’sadirtylittleSecretinmanyAmericanhomes--couplesfightaboutthehousework.It’sNo.1issuemyhusbandandIargue
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
______isanAmericanpoetwhosegreatworkLeavesofGrasswritteninunconventionalmeterandrhyme,celebratestheself,deat
______,writtenin1854byCharlesDickens,isanearnestattackonthevulgarityandmaterialismoftherisingmiddleclassind
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
AccordingtotheSpeechActTheory,whenaspeakeruttersasentencetomakeastatementortomakeanoffer,heisperformingt
Thiswasthecapital’smostanxiousweeksinceSeptember11th.OnMondaythegovernmentissuedaredalertthatterroristattac
Educationalphilosophyhaschangedagreatdealinthe50yearssinceIwasinschool.Backthen,forexample,Ihadthehighe
随机试题
境内上市外资股参照国际通行标准,实行预留股份,预留的数额不超过该次拟募集境内上市外资股数额的()
男性,58岁。午休后突感头晕,右侧肢体无力伴不能言语,既往:有冠心病、房颤史,头颅CT扫描示左侧内囊区一斑片状低密度影男性,57岁。突然出现右侧上肢麻木伴无力,说话困难。约10分钟缓解,次日再度出现同样症状,并伴有左侧眼睛视物模糊,10分钟后再次缓解。
A.Murphy(墨菲征)阳性B.麦氏点压痛C.Courvoisier(库瓦西耶征)阳性D.Courvoisicr(库瓦西耶征)阴性E.板状腹急性胆囊炎可引起的体征是()
凝血酶时间(TT)延长见于()
杜仲的主产地是牡丹皮的主产地是
施工方进度控制的经济措施包括()。
一个完整的期货交易流程应包括()。
学科取向的课程有()课程观。
事后控制不如事中控制,事中控制不如事前控制,可惜大多数事业经营者均未能________到这一点,等到错误的决策造成了重大的损失才如梦方醒,结果往往是请来了名气很大的“空降兵”,也________。填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()。
算法的时间复杂度是指()。
最新回复
(
0
)