首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than
admin
2019-08-27
48
问题
To govern is to choose how the revenue raised from taxes is spent. So far so good, or bad. But some people earn more money than others. Should they pay proportionately more money to the government than those who earn less? And if they do pay more money are they entitled to more services than those who pay less or those who pay nothing at all? And should those who pay nothing at all because they have nothing get anything? These matters are of irritable concern to our rulers, and of some poignancy to the rest.
Although the equality of each citizen before the law is the rock upon which the American Constitution rests, economic equality has never been an American ideal. In fact, it is the one unmentionable subject in our politics, as the senator from South Dakota recently discovered when he came up with a few quasi-egalitarian tax reforms. The furious and enduring terror of Communism in America is not entirely the work of those early cold warriors Truman and Acheson. A dislike of economic equality is something deep-grained in the American Protestant character. After all, given a rich empty continent for vigorous Europeans to exploit (the Indians were simply a disagreeable part of the emptiness, like chiggers), any man of gumption could make himself a good living. With extra hard work, any man could make himself a fortune, proving that he was a better man than the rest. Long before Darwin the American ethos was Darwinian.
The vision of the rich empty continent is still a part of the American unconscious in spite of the Great Crowding and its attendant miseries; and this lingering belief in the heaven any man can make for himself through hard work and clean living is a key to the majority’s prevailing and apparently unalterable hatred of the poor, kept out of sight at home, out of mind abroad.
Yet there has been, from the beginning, a significant division in our ruling class. The early Thomas Jefferson had a dream: a society of honest yeomen, engaged in agricultural pursuits, without large cities, heavy industry, banks, military pretensions. The early (and the late) Alexander Hamilton wanted industry, banks, cities, and a military force capable of making itself felt in world politics. It is a nice irony that so many of today’s laissez-faire conservatives think that they descend from Hamilton, the proponent of a strong federal government, and that so many liberals believe themselves to be the heirs of the early Jefferson, who wanted little more than a police force and a judiciary. Always practical, Jefferson knew that certain men would rise through their own good efforts while, sadly, others would fall. Government would do no more than observe this Darwinian spectacle benignly, and provide no succor.
In 1800 the Hamiltonian view was rejected by the people and their new President Thomas Jefferson. Four years later, the Hamiltonian view had prevailed and was endorsed by the reelected Jefferson. Between 1800 and 1805 Jefferson had seen to it that an empire in posse had become an empire in esse. The difference between Jefferson I and Jefferson II is reflected in the two inaugural addresses.
It is significant that nothing more elevated than greed changed the Dr. Jekyll of Jefferson I into the Mr. Hyde of Jefferson II. Like his less thoughtful countrymen, Jefferson could not resist a deal. Subverting the Constitution he had helped create, Jefferson bought Louisiana from Napoleon, acquiring its citizens without their consents. The author of The Declaration of Independence was quite able to forget the unalienable rights of anyone whose property he thought should be joined to our empire — a word which crops up frequently and unselfconsciously in his correspondence.
In the course of land-grabbing, Jefferson II managed to get himself into hot water with France, England, and Spain simultaneously, a fairly astonishing thing to do considering the state of politics in Napoleonic Europe.
Jefferson’s early political writings espoused what would today be called______.
选项
A、collectivism
B、libertarianism
C、socialism
D、liberalism
答案
D
解析
根据倒数第二段的“The author of The Declaration of Independence was quite able to forget the unalienable rights of anyone whose property he thought should be joined to our empire—a word which crops up frequently and unselfconsciously in his correspondence.”可知, 《独立宣言》的作者(杰斐逊)完全忘记了公民不可剥夺的权利。这个词频繁出现在他的信件中。据此可知,D项“liberalism自由主义”正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VZUO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Thewordhospiceishundredsofyearsold.ItcomestousfromthetimecalledtheMiddleAgesinEurope.Religiousgroupsthen
Accordingtosociologists,thereareseveraldifferentwaysinwhichapersonmaybecomerecognizedastheleaderofsocialgrou
ItisnotdifficulttobepessimisticaboutthefutureofEuropeanbusiness.【T1】ComparedwiththeawesomestrengthofAmericaa
Itisimpossibletowhethershe’llbewellenoughtocomehomefromthehospitalnextmonth.
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabureaucraticmanagementinwhichmanbecomesasmall,
Inmanyplaces,illnesswasseeneitherasaninvasionofthebodybysomepoisonoritwas______totheworkofanangrygod,ma
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
Ironically,theintellectualtoolscurrentlybeingusedbythepoliticalrighttosuchharmfuleffectoriginatedontheacademic
Theauthor______usasconsistentlyfairandaccurateabouttheissues.(2013年3月中国科学院考博试题)
各学科的发展日新月异,令人称奇,但衡量知识、能力的方法却依然如故,非常原始。迄今为止,教育工作还没有找到比考试更有效、更可靠的方法,着实有点离奇。尽管有不少人认定,考试能衡量出一个人的知识水平,但实际情况恰恰相反,这是有目共睹的。
随机试题
下列有关洋地黄治疗慢性肺心病心力衰竭的叙述,不正确的是
双侧上颌结节明显突向颊侧,倒凹大者,全口义齿修复时要
某建设项目,当折现率i1=10%时,财务净现值FNPV1=200万元;当i2=15%时,FNPV2=-100万元,用内插公式法可求得其财务内部收益率为()。
申请设立期货交易所,应当向中国证监会提交的文件和材料不包括( )。
某储户活期储蓄账户6月30日的累计计息积数为400000,如果结息日挂牌公告的活期储蓄利率为2.25%,该储户应结利息为()。
某教师在“青春期”一节的教学中,为了引导学生思考,设计了5个问题,分别请各个小组派一名代表进行回答。该教学行为符合课程基本理念的()。
下列哪些说法是对矛盾特殊性原理的具体运用?()
【B1】【B11】
Theideathatthelifecutshortunfulfilledillogicalbecauselivesaremeasuredbytheimpressionstheyleaveontheworldand
Everythingworkssosmoothlythatpeopledon’trealizeanymorethattheyaretakingariskindevelopingurbanareasinlow-lyin
最新回复
(
0
)