首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in hi
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in hi
admin
2013-04-25
24
问题
Consumer Demand and Development of Green Cars
The day automakers put the earth at the top of their agenda will go down in history. Reading this book, one gets the sense that day is coming, major automakers—still no paragons of environmentalism—have gotten the message that replacing the dirty internal-combustion engine is an urgent priority. With less than 5 percent of the world’s population, Americans produce 14 percent of all global warming carbon-dioxide gas. And car tailpipes pump out more than 30 percent of U. S. air pollution.
In his new book, Forward Drive: The Race to Build "Clean" Cars for the Future, environmentalist Jim Motavalli concludes that capitalist competition is leading the way over government mandates to clean up that exhaust. Motavalli chronicles the movement for cleaner cars: the few visionaries and zealots building and driving home-built battery-powered cars; the divided giant automakers working tirelessly to develop clean cars while fighting regulatory efforts to require them; university researchers concluding studies; and the regulators trying to speed their adoption.
Forward Drive covers the technological advances of the hybrid and fuel-cell vehicles poised to take over from the internal-combustion engine. In some ways, Motavalli is an unlikely narrator. A self-vowed car nut who stumbled into a job editing E, the Enviromental Magazine, he seems biased on both sides of the issue. But ultimately, that’s what makes him best suited to tell this story.
Motoavalli’s concern for the environment is sincere, and his knowledge of cars is refreshingly accurate. The most interesting passages follow his transformattion from internal-combustion devotee to environmental auto cynic and battery-car zealot to hopeful future-car realist. "It was disconcerting, to say the least, to learn that my hobby of collecting classic cars and my growing concern for the environment didn’t necessarily mesh," Motavalli writes. "The car has certainly been good to me, but I’m becomin disenchanted."
In the preface, he noted that he set out to write a book critical of the auto industry for teaming up with major oil companies to block the development of clean cars. But when he dug in to do more research, he found a different story. Namely that automakers in Detroit, Japan, and Europe are in a heated race to start selling cars that are more environmentally correct.
(A)Unfortunately, Motavalli glosses over issues of consumer demand.
(B)He never mentions that today’s electric cars and gasoline-electric hybrids cost far more than internal-combustion cars of equal or greater capability.
(C)He notes their utter dedication to their electric cars and implies that the rest of the buying public should simply be as enthusiastic, without addressing issues of price or various ways families use their cars.
(D)
He strongly favors California’s mandate that 10 percent of all vehicles sold in the state be zero-emission-vehicle-battery or fuel-cell electrics, not hybrids—even though he writes, "Ultimately, vehicles halfheartedly designed to meet a mandate would fail in the marketplace." And he gives a short shift to the point that clean cars do nothing to ease congestion and sprawl.
In a telephone interview, Motavalli concedes that technology is progressing faster than the book deadline allowed him to keep up with. If anything, automakers are working harder to develop hybrid-electrics. And mass-market hybrid-drive systems will likely first show up in the big sport utility vehicles that Motavalli rails against.
Nevertheless, he now believes that the automakers with the deepest pockets have the best chance of building better cars for tomorrow. "The new, clean cars will emerge not from a tinkerer’s garage, but from the well-funded research labs of the same big auto companies that initially fought their introduction," he says.
The word disenchanted in Paragraph 4 is closest in meaning to ______.
选项
A、disillusioned
B、disadvantaged
C、disembodied
D、disheveled
答案
A
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词disenchanted(醒悟的)的理解。选项A(醒悟的)与之意思相同,所以选项A为正确答案。选项B(处于不利地位的)、选项C(使脱离实体的)和选项D(散乱的,凌乱的)都与该词义不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/VvyO777K
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
SECTION3Questions21-30Questions21-25CompletethenotesaboutwhatmakesagoodteacherusingNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSfo
SECTION1Questions1-10Questions1and2Completetheformopposite.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSAND/ORANUMBERforeach
SECTION2Questions11-20Questions11-12CompletethefollowingsentencesusingNOMORETHANTWOWORDSforeachanswer.
Thelecturersaysthatanessayislike______toaspecificquestion.Useinterviewstogatherinformation.
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.EngineeringforsustainabledevelopmentTheGreenhou
Completethenotesbelow.WriteONEWORDONLYforeachanswer.DevelopmentStudiesDevelopmentStudiesattemptstounderstand-
A、Hishousematedoesn’twantthewindowsdosedB、HishousemateisresponsibleforpayingtheelectricbillC、Thewindowsarehar
GreenPowerYou’veinsulatedtheattic,installedtriple-glazedwindows,andboughthigh-efficiencyappliances.Canyoumake
GreenPowerYou’veinsulatedtheattic,installedtriple-glazedwindows,andboughthigh-efficiencyappliances.Canyoumake
GreenPowerYou’veinsulatedtheattic,installedtriple-glazedwindows,andboughthigh-efficiencyappliances.Canyoumakeyou
随机试题
关于Internet的说法,下列错误的是________。
Word2010中,如果文档已经分节,可以为文档的不同节设置不同的页眉和页脚。()
A.阴中之阳B.阴中之阴C.阴中之至阴D.阳中之阳E.阳中之阴
乳胶漆属于以下哪种油漆涂料?[2010—038]
规划评估单位应当按照规定提出()。
广西有位初一的女学生因受不了军训,吃洗衣粉自杀。你怎么看?
正确认识和把握物质的决定作用和意识的反作用,必须处理好主观能动性和客观规律的关系。要发挥人的主观能动性,必须()
关于数据划分策略,下述说法错误的是______。A)散列划分采用某种散列函数,以数据的划分属性作为函数参数,计算数据应存储的磁盘序号B)范围划分根据某个属性的取值,将数据划分为n个部分,分别存储到不同磁盘上C)范围划分有利于范围查询和点查询,但也可能
Itisanunfortunatefactoftoday’slifethatmostpeoplearegrowingupunabletoseethestars.Theprimenightskyexistson
•Youwillhearfiveshortrecordings.•Foreachrecording,decidewhatthespeakeristalkingabout.•Writeoneletter(A--H)
最新回复
(
0
)