首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are
admin
2015-01-09
58
问题
Despite decades of scientific research, no one yet knows how much damage human activity is doing to the environment. Humans are thought to be responsible for a whole host of environmental problems, ranging from global warming to ozone depletion. What is not in doubt,however,is the devastating effect humans are having on the animal and plant life of the planet.
Currently,an estimated 50,000 species become extinct every year. If this carries on, the impact on all living creatures is likely to be profound,says Dr. Nick Middleton.a geographer at Oxford University. "All species depend in some way on each other to survive. And the danger is that,if you remove one species from this very complex web of interrelationships,you have very little idea about the knock-on effects of other extinctions."
Complicating matters is the fact that there are no obvious solutions to the problem. Unlike global warming and ozone depletion—which,if the political will was there,could be reduced by cutting gas emissions—preserving biodiversity remains an intractable problem.
The latest idea is "sustainable management", which is seen as a practical and economical way of protecting species from extinction. This means humans should be able to use any species of animal or plant for their benefit, provided enough individuals of that species are left alive to ensure its continued existence.
For instance,instead of depending on largely ineffective laws against poaching,it gives local people a good economic reason to preserve plants and animals. In Zimbabwe, there is a sustainable management project elephants. Foreign tourists pay large sums of money to kill these animals for sport. This money is then given to the inhabitants of the area where the hunting takes place. In theory,locals will be encouraged to protect elephants instead of poaching them—or allowing others to poach them—because of the economic benefit involved.
This sounds like a sensible strategy, but it remains to be seen whether it will work. With corruption e-ndemic in many developing countries,some observers are skeptical that the money will actually reach the people it is intended for. Others wonder how effective the locals will be at stopping poachers.
There are also questions about whether sustainable management is practical when it comes to protecting areas of great-bio-diversity such as the world’s tropical forests. In theory,the principle should be the same as with elephants—allow logging companies to cut down a certain number of trees,but not so many as to completely destroy the forest.
Sustainable management of forests requires controls on the number of trees which are cut down,as well as investment in replacing them. But because almost all tropical forests are located in countries which desperately need revenue from logging,there are few regulations to do this. Moreover,unrestricted logging is so much more profitable that wood prices from managed forests would cost up to five times more—an increase that consumers.no matter how"green",are unlikely to pay.
For these reasons,sustainable management of tropical forests is unlikely to become widespread in the near future. This is disheartening news. It’s estimated these forests contain anything from 50 to 90 percent of all animal and plant species on Earth. In one study of a five-square-kilometer area of rain forest in Peru,for instance,scientists counted 1,300 species of butterfly and 600 species of bird. In the entire continental United States, only 400 species of butterfly and 700 species of bird have been recorded.
Scientist Professor Norman Myers sees this situation as a gigantic"experiment we’re conducting with our planet". "We don’t know what the outcome will be. If we make a mess of it, we can’t move to another planet...It’s a case of one planet,one experiment."
What damage do we know for sure is human activity doing to the environment?
选项
A、Global warming.
B、Ozone depletion.
C、Species extinction.
D、All of the above.
答案
D
解析
题目问:人类活动对环境造成了哪些破坏?第一段“Humans are thought to be responsible for awhole host of environmental problems.ranging from global warming to ozone depletion.What is not indoubt,however,is the devastating effect humans are having on the animal and plant life of the planet.”通过这段话可知,人类要对一系列的环境问题负责,从全球变暖到臭氧层的消耗。然而,我们确定的是人类正在对地球上动植物进行毁灭性的破坏。据此判断,答案是D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/WZQO777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Despitethegeneralnegativefindings,itisimportanttorememberthatallchildrenwholivethroughadivorcedonotbehavein
Iwasbornin1927,theonlychildofmiddle-classparents.Iwassenttoapublicschool,Iwastedtwoyearsdoingmynational
Inthemovie,heplaysalovingand______fathertryingtobringuptwoteenagechildrenonhisown.
LauranceRockefeller,themiddlebrotherofthefiveprominentandbenevolentgrandsonsofJohnD.Rockefeller,whoconcentrated
TheUnitedNationsdeclaredlastFridaythatSomalia’sfamineisover.Buttheofficialdeclarationmeanslittletothemillions
______6millionpeoplestartingdietsonNewYear’sDay,researchsuggeststhatbytheendoftheweek92percentofdietersgav
Onlinenewspapersarealookintothefutureandjustponderingitraisesthequestionofwhetheritisn’tnicergettingyourda
Youknowyourselfbetterthananyoneelse:doesnotundertakethatprojectunlessyoucan______it.
Mycousinlikeseatingverymuchbutheisn’tvery______aboutthefoodheeats.
Directadvertisingincludesallformsofsalesappeals,mailed,delivered,orexhibiteddirectlytotheprospectivebuyerofan
随机试题
可以使血糖升高的激素包括
患者,男性,65岁。既往有高血压心脏病史,因上消化道大出血入院,经输血输液后,测中心静脉压22cmH2O,血压70/50mmHg。该患者最首要的处理是
按照公式计算,正常2周岁的小儿,其身高为
适用于频数分布资料,说明观察单位的分布状况的统计图是
在一条垂线上,水深大于5m时,应取()水样。
统计整理是对( )进行整理。
根据《中华人民共和国个人所得税法》及其实施条例的规定,在计算应缴纳税所得额时,一般允许从个人的应税收入中减去税法规定的扣除项目或扣除金额。下列项目中,采用定额扣除办法的是()。
是临床上评定抑郁状态时应用得最为普遍的量表。
一堂好课的基本要求有哪些?
2015年,因为多年实施财政赤字政策,巨额欧元债务到期而无法偿还导致政府违约,银行被迫关门歇业,陷入经济混乱的欧洲国家是:
最新回复
(
0
)