首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature
admin
2021-02-21
92
问题
Science has few more controversial topics than human intelligence—in particular, whether variations in it are a result of nature or nurture, and especially whether such variations differ between the sexes. The mines in this field can blow up an entire career, as Larry Summers found out in 2005 when he spoke of the hypothesis that the mathematical aptitude needed for physics and engineering, as well as for maths itself, is innately rarer in women than in men. He resigned as president of Harvard University shortly afterwards.
It is bold, therefore, of Jonathan Wai, Martha Putallaz and Matthew Makel, of Duke University in North Carolina, to enter the argument with a paper that addresses both questions. In this paper, they describe how they sifted through nearly three decades of standardised tests administered to American high-school students to see what had been happening to the country’s brightest sparks. They draw two conclusions. One is that a phenomenon called the Flynn effect applies in particular to the brightest of the bright. The other is that part, but not all, of the historic difference between the brainiest men and women has vanished.
The three researchers drew their data from Duke University’s Talent Identification Programme, TIP, which is designed to discover especially clever candidates early on: all the participants had scored in the top 5% of ability when confronted with exams designed for much older students. TIP, in turn, draws on three national exams: SAT, EXPLORE and ACT.
In the early 1980s, the ratio of males to females in the top 0.01% of maths scores in SAT, the Scholastic Aptitude Test, was around 13 to 1. By the early 1990s, it had fallen to four to one. After this, however, it remained unaltered.
It is clear that the rise itself must be "nurture" of some sort, but the subsequent stasis could have either explanation. A line of reasoning in favour of "nature" is that put forward by Simon Baron-Cohen, a psychologist at Cambridge University. This connects the extreme systematising patterns of thought which make a good mathematician with the advantage of men among those with Asperger’s syndrome, a form of autism that does not harm a person’s general intelligence. But the difference could equally well be the result of some as-yet-unclear difference between the ways girls and boys are brought up.
That such unclear environmental influences can have real effects on IQ is eloquently illustrated by the Flynn effect. This phenomenon, brought to the world’s attention in the 1980s by James Flynn of the University of Otago, in New Zealand, is that average IQs around the world have been rising at the rate of 0.3 points a year for the past eight decades. Using the TIP data, Dr Wai and his colleagues showed that this is as true of the brightest youngsters in American society as it is of lesser mortals, suggesting that even they can have their abilities boosted by whatever is causing the Flynn effect. Once again, the changes seem to be mainly in mathematics. Scores in the brightest children’s verbal-reasoning and reading abilities demonstrate no clear trend, but all three national tests show sustained improvements in their mathematical ability over the past three decades.
[A] aims to find out extraordinarily smart people based on three exams in America.
[B] shows, with colleagues, that general IQs of the cleverest youngsters have been rising.
[C] assumes that genetically, there is an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes.
[D] presents that there are some relationships between intelligence and Asperger’s syndrome.
[E] shows that IQ has been rising on average under environmental influences.
[F] finds an inequality in mathematical ability between sexes according to his research.
[G] concludes, with his colleagues, that intelligent difference between sexes doesn’t change.
Jonathan Wai
选项
答案
B
解析
Jonathan Wai出现在文中的第二段和最后一段,解题句在最后一段。该段指出,通过分析TIP的数据,卫博士和他的同事们证实了无论是天才还是普通人,都适应弗林效应。B中的the cleverest youngsters与原文the brightest youngsters同义,that general IQs…have been rising阐明了原文中this指代的内容,故确定B为本题的正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/Y1Y4777K
0
考研英语二
相关试题推荐
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Excitement,fatigue,andanxietycanallbedetectedfromsomeone’sblinks,accordingtopsychologistJohnStern(21)Washington
Youstillneedsomesubstantialexamples______supportofyourargument,orfewpeoplewillbelieveinyouridea.
Tensofthousandsof18-year-oldswillgraduatethisyearandbehandedmeaninglessdiplomas.Thesediplomaswon’tlookanydiff
Mosthumanbeingsactuallydecidebeforetheythink.Whenanyhumanbeing—executive,specializedexpert,orpersoninthestreet
KimiyukiSudashouldbeaperfectcustomerforJapan’scar-makers.He’sayoung,successfulexecutiveatanInternet-servicesco
Parentsofchildrenwhohappilyeatwhat’sputinfrontofthemmightassumetheirkidsarewellnourished.Buttwonewstudies
Supposeyouhavedamagedyourfriend’scomputerwhenyoulivedinhishouseafewdaysago.Writehimaletterto1)makean
Brothersandsistersfight,butwhenthebickeringevolvesintophysicaloremotionalabuse,it’sbullying.Ordinaryargumentso
随机试题
起动机控制电路有:_______、_______和_______。
我国公民和外国人结婚,应当适用的法律是_____________。
A、Therewerenoplanetswithoutmoons.B、TherewasnoairorwateronJupiter.C、Lifewasnotpossibleinouterspace.D、Themys
A.多为上腹正中或偏右节律性疼痛B.多为剑突下正中或偏左节律性疼痛C.上腹疼痛无典型节律性,呕吐多见D.上腹持续性剧烈疼痛E.右上腹节律性疼痛,夜间痛和背痛多见且突出幽门管溃疡的临床表现是
下唇麻木是哪种阻滞麻醉注射成功的主要标志
良性肿瘤的病理特点是
对房地产开发公司进行土地增值税清算时,可作为清算单位的是()。
根据《反洗钱法》的规定,客户身份资料在业务关系结束后、客户交易信息在交易结束后,金融机构应当()。
简述无领导小组讨论题目的类型、设计原则和流程。
某测验的信度是0.8,现欲通过增加测验项目的长度的方法将信度提高到0.9,原测验的有20个题目,新测验需增加的题目数是
最新回复
(
0
)