首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so
admin
2011-01-08
36
问题
What makes for a successful invasion? Often, the answer is to have better weapons than the enemy. And, as it is with people, so it is with plants—at least, that is the conclusion of a paper published in Biology Letters by Naomi Cappueeino, of Carleton University, and Thor Arnason, of the University of Ottawa, both in Canada.
The phenomenon of alien species popping up unexpected parts of the world has grown over the past few decades as people and goods become more mobile and plant seeds and animal larvae have hitched along for the ride. Most such aliens blend into the ecosystem in which they arrive without too much fuss. (Indeed, many probably fail to establish themselves at all—but those failures, of course, are never noticed.) Occasionally, though,
something goes bananas
and starts ttarts to take the place over, and an invasive species is born. Dr. Cappuceino and Dr. Arnason asked themselves why.
One hypothesis is that aliens leave their predators behind. Since the predators in their new homelands are not adapted to exploit them, they are able to reproduce unchecked. That is a nice idea, but it does not explain why only certain aliens become invasive. Dr. Cappuccino and Dr. Amason suspected this might be because native predators are sometimes "pre-adapted" to the aliens’ defenees, but in other cases they are not.
To test this, they had first to establish a reliable list of invaders. That is not as easy as it sounds. As they observe, "although there are many lists of invasive species published by governmental agencies, inclusion of a given species in the lists may not be entirely hee of political motivation". Instead, they polled established researchers in the field of alien species, aski,g each to list ten invasive species and, for comparison, ten aliens that just rubbed along quietly with their neighbours. The result was a list of 21 species widely agreed to be invasive and, for comparison, 18 non-invasive aliens.
Having established these lists, they went to the library to find out what was known about the plants’ chemistry. Their aim was to find the most prominent chemical weapon in each plant, whether that weapon was directed against insects that might want to eat the plant, bacteria and fungi that might want to infect it, or other plants that might compete for space, water, nutrients and light. Botanists know a lot about which sorts of compounds have what roles, so classifying constituent chemicals in this way was not too hard.
The researchers then compared the chemical arsenals of their aliens with those of native North American plants, to see if superior (or, at least, unusual) weapomT was the explanation for the invaders’ success. Their hypothesis was that highly invasive species would have chemical weapons not found in native plants, and which pests, parasites and other plants would therefore not have evolved any resistance to. The more benign aliens, by contrast, were predicted to have arsenals also found in at least some native species.
And so it proved. More than 40% of the invasive species had a chemical unknown to native plants; just over 10% of the non-invasive aliens had such a chemical. Moreover, when they looked at past studies on alien plants that had examined how much such plants suffer from the depredations of herbivorous insects, they found that the extent of the damage reported was significantly conelated with the number of native species with which that alien shared its principal chemical weapon.
For alien plants, then, the real secret of success—also as in human warfare—is surprise. It is not that the chemicals concerned are more toxic in any general sense (indeed, successful invaders are often rare in their own native habitats). Rather, it is that the locals just don’t see them coming.
According to the text, the success of invasion lies in the fact that the native plants
选项
A、are unaware of the invasion of alien species.
B、contain more poisonous chemicals.
C、are defeated in plant warfare.
D、may die out in their own habitats.
答案
A
解析
细节题。由题干中的success定位至末段,最后两句指出外来植物成功入侵的原因:它不在于一般意义上所认为的那样具有毒性更强的化学物质,而是因为本地掠食者根本没有察觉它们的到来。[A]符合原文,故为答案;[B]是对chemicals cobcerned are more toxic in any general sense的曲解,这里说的是一般人认为“外来物种携带的化学物质毒性强”,不是native plants,排除;[C]和[D]原文没有提及,为干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/YCeO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
ExpositionExpositioniswritingthatexplains.Mostofthebooksinuniversityibrariesareexamplesofexposition.Alth
AftersomanyyearsofstudyingEnglish,youmaystillgetconfusedlikeyoufirstcomeherejustbecauseoftheslangthestude
Inwhichofthefollowingworkscanyoufindthepropernames“Lilliput,”“Brobdingnag,”“Houyhnhnm,”and“Yahoo”?
SteveandYaserfirstmetintheirchemistryclassofanAmericanuniversity.YaserwasaninternationalstudentfromJordan.He
Norms:TypesandAcceptanceSociologistsfindthattounderstandaculture,itisveryimportanttounderstanditsnorms.Ⅰ.
A、IsraeliPrimeMinisterissinceretocallforceasefireB、Sharon’sappealtostopongoingviolenceisa"lie"C、theybelieve
A、Thetrainwascontroledbyoutlaws.B、Thebuswentpastastopsign.C、Thetrainwentpastastopsign.D、Thebushittheonco
_______looksatlanguagefromapsychologicalpointofview,andtohim,competenceisapropertyofthemindofeachindividua
Theold-agepaternalismofsouthernCanadiansoverEskimoshasdiedmoreslowlyintheruralvillageswhereEskimoshavebeenmo
GoalTrimmerUtopiasaresupposedtobedreamsofthefuture.ButtheAmericanUtopia?Latelyit’sadreamthatwas,atwili
随机试题
公路施工合同条款中规定,下列文件中优先级最低的是()。
根据人机特性和人机功能合理分配的原则,适合于机器做的是()工作。
企业核心能力企业外扩张战略包括()
下列关于建设项目质量管理的八项原则中“管理的系统方法”的内容表述有误的是()。
根据《建设工程工程量清单计价规范》(GB50500),关于材料和专业工程暂估价的说法中,正确的是()。【2011年真题】
关于项目目标动态控制的说法,正确的是()。
教师如何备课?
(2018·山西)教育史上两大对立学派——传统教育学派与现代教育学派的代表人物分别是()
。约言之,藏书的①当能铸冶治学的风气,影响学风,②学术思想的活跃,学术思想的活跃又进一步③学风,并给著述提供津梁。战国时期学术的百家争鸣的出现,无疑与图书事业的发展有千丝万缕的联系。。梁代萧绎出任荆州称帝江陵,,招致饱学之士如林,使长江中游地方出现了一次学
Whereshouldlargecarry-onitemsbestored?
最新回复
(
0
)