首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Sc
admin
2013-01-24
95
问题
Let’s Not Hide Health Costs
We are awash in health-care proposals. President Bush has one. So does California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden has a plan, as does a coalition led by Families USA (a liberal advocacy group) and America’s Health Insurance Plans (a trade group). To some extent, all these plans and others aim to provide insurance to the estimated 47 million Americans who lack it—a situation widely deplored as a national disgrace. But the real significance of all these proposals, I submit, lies elsewhere.
For decades, Americans have treated health care as if it exists in a separate economic and political world: when people need care, they should get it; costs should remain out of sight.
About 60 percent of Americans receive insurance through their employers; to most workers, the full costs are unknown. The 65-and-older population and many poor people receive government insurance. Except for modest Medicare premiums and payroll taxes, costs are largely buried in federal and state budgets.
It is this segregation of health care from everything else that is now crumbling—and the various health proposals are just one sign. We see others all the time. For example, even with employer-provided insurance, workers’ monthly premiums (which cover only part of the costs) have skyrocketed. From 1999 to 2006, they doubled from $129 to $248.
Look at Massachusetts. Last year the then Gov. Mitt Romney made headlines by signing legislation to cover all the state’s uninsured. The law required that everyone with incomes three times the federal poverty line buy "affordable" insurance (people with incomes below that threshold would be subsidized on a sliding scale). Romney suggested annual premiums for a single worker might total $2,400. But when insurance companies recently provided real estimates, the cost was much higher: $4,560. Is it a sensible policy to force workers with a $30,000 income— about triple the poverty line— to spend nearly a sixth of their budget on health insurance, as opposed to food, rent or transportation? Good question.
The hard questions won’t sit still, because health care (now a sixth of the economy, up from an 11th in 1980) is too big to be hidden. Myths abound. Contrary to conventional wisdom, the doubling of premiums for employer-provided coverage doesn’t mean companies shifted a greater share of costs to workers. In both 1999 and 2006, premiums covered 27 percent of costs, says Paul Fronstin of the Employee Benefit Research Institute. It’s simply the rapid rise in total health spending that’s depressed workers’ take-home pay.
One myth about the uninsured is that, because they’re heavy users of emergency-room services, providing them with insurance (and regular care) would actually lower their costs. This may be true for some—but not most. The trouble is that the uninsured don’t really use emergency rooms heavily. A study on the journal Health Affairs finds that their use is similar to that of people with private insurance—and half that of people with Medicaid. The upshot is that extending insurance to all the uninsured would be costly, because they would get more and (presumably) better care. John Sheils of the Lewin Group estimates the annual cost of their care would rise 75 percent to $145 billion.
Our health-care system will inevitably combine government regulation and private enterprise. But what should the mix be? Which patients, providers and technologies should be subsidized and why? How important is health care compared with other public and private goals? Will an expanding healthcare sector spur the economy—or, through high taxes and insurance premiums, retard it? We have refused to have this debate for obvious reasons. A friend of mine recently had a near-death experience; he survived only because he had superb medical care. Debating health care makes us queasy, because it pits moral imperatives (including the right to live) against coldhearted economics.
I don’t intend to examine—at least now—all the new proposals. Some would do better at some goals (say, protecting the poor) than at others (say, controlling costs). But the Bush proposal does have one huge virtue: it exposes health-care costs to the broad public. By not taxing employer-paid insurance, the government now provides a huge invisible subsidy to workers. Bush wouldn’t end the subsidy, but by modifying it with specific deductions for insurance ($15,000 for families, $7,500 for singles), he would force most workers to see the costs. By contrast, some other proposals disguise their costs. Schwarzenegger’s plan shifts costs to the federal government, doctors and hospitals. It’s clever, but it perpetuates the illusion that health care is cheap—or even free.
However our health system evolves—with more government control or more market influence—Americans need to come to a more realistic understanding of its limits. Underestimating its costs and exaggerating its benefits guarantees disappointment. If the present outpouring of proposals signals a start of our needed debate, then it is long overdue.
What can be inferred from the passage about health care in America?
选项
A、American health care is cheap.
B、The government can afford to pay health cost.
C、Health care has become a problem to be heeded.
D、Health care is not so serious as to affect the economy.
答案
C
解析
从全文的分析可以得出如下结论,美国的卫生保健体制应引起人们的足够重视,而不是像人们想象的那样,费用低廉甚至是免费的。故C为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ZMaO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
TheEnglishVocabularyVocabularyisacompleteinventoryofthewordsinalanguage.Itcanbedividedintoactivevocabulary
Twotechniqueshaverecentlybeendevelopedtosimplifyresearchandreducethenumberofnonhumanprimatesneededinstudiesof
NonverbalCommunicationNonverbalcommunicationisusuallyreferredtoasthe"hiddendimension"ofcommunication,whichisa
Thetypeoflanguagewhichisselectedasappropriatetoatypeofsituationisa
A、developingandutilizingnewsourcesofenergy.B、reducingtaxesontheworkingpeopleoftheUS.C、encouragingtodesignand
A、surpassanothercandidate.B、bethepresidentofHaiti.C、avoidasecondroundrunoff.D、defeathisrivalinthefirstround.
A、FormerPresidentofRussiaYeltsindiedofaheartattackat76.B、BillClintonandhiswifeareexpectedtoattendonbehalf
我冒了严寒,回到相隔二千余里,别了二十余年的故乡去。时候既然是深冬,渐近故乡时,天气又阴晦了,冷风吹进船舱中,呜呜的响,从蓬隙向外一望,苍黄的天底下,远近横着几个萧索的荒村,没有一些活气。我的心禁不住悲凉起来了。啊!这不是我二十年来时时记得的故乡
随机试题
货币供给机制是由()两个层次构成的货币制造系统。
下列关于网络营销概念的说法中,错误的是
患者,女,25岁,未婚。每次行经期间,小腹冷痛拒按,得热则舒,月经量少,色黯有块,畏寒身痛,舌淡黯,苔白腻,脉沉紧。其中医治法是
男性,44岁,发现HBsAg阳性9年,时有增高,近3周来食欲下降,尿黄,明显乏力,齿龈出血,近2周尿少。查体:神清,扑翼样震颤(+),化验:ALT176U/L,TB432μmol/L,Pr38秒(对照13秒),该患者应诊断为
黄某19周岁和赵某17周岁合伙盗窃邻村王某家的耕牛。黄某在门外望风,赵某进牛棚牵牛。由于赵某不小心弄出响声,被王某发现。黄某听到王某的吆喝声,不顾赵某即逃走。王某手持木棍紧追赵某,赵某为了逃避王某的抓捕,掏出随身携带的水果刀朝王某身上捅了一刀后逃走
甲国某公司与乙国驻甲国使馆因办公设备合同产生纠纷,并诉诸甲国法院。根据相关国际法规则,下列哪些选项是正确的?(2014年卷一75题)
国务院于1999年5月14日发布了《导游人员管理条例》,并于1999年10月1日起施行。()
某国际开发区的儿童社会工作机构致力于开设“家长学校”,他们对自愿参加活动的父母进行参与式培训,并有针对性地设立了亲子沟通、同伴教育、和谐邻居、拒绝家庭暴力等模拟交流学习课程。他们的工作属于宏观儿童社会工作中的( )。
Whenmengrowolder,theirhairoftenbeginstofallout.Whenhairbeginstofallout【C1】______oldage,itisimpossibletomak
Theproblemhas______simplybecauseyoudidn’tfollowtheinstructionsinthehandbook.
最新回复
(
0
)