首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page. For each question(1
admin
2015-01-27
60
问题
Read the following article about recruitment process outsourcing and the questions on the opposite page.
For each question(15-20), mark one letter(A, B, C or D)on your Answer Sheet.
Recruitment Process Outsourcing
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO— has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expectations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adjunct to an organisation’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s)with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategies, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors— their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid " nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategic improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
Employers try hard to find talents by themselves to
选项
A、make recruitment a core department of their companies.
B、cut cost and guarantee better results.
C、ensure the effectiveness of the recruitment process.
D、come with little risk and high accountability for results.
答案
B
解析
文中第四段提到“Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in—houseas contractors--their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability butwith reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes”,即:公司很快意识到他们像承包商一样找到合适的人才一他们的用意当然是着重于达到相同的伸缩性,但是成本更低且更好对结果进行控制。而且选项中的cut cost与文中的reduced cost相对应,选项中的guarantee better results与文中的greater control of the outcomes相对应。所以,B项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ag7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.(Thecandidatechoosesonetopic
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Askingquestions询问
Question询问
Askingquestions查询
Howtooperateawordprocessor
Inthispartofthetest,youareaskedtogiveashorttalkonabusinesstopic.Youhavetochooseoneofthetopicsfromthe
Theinterlocutorasksyouquestionsonanumberofwork-relatedandnonwork-relatedsubjects.
随机试题
在和谐文化建设中,抓住了根本,才能形成全社会的共同理想,树立全社会的和谐理念、形成全社会的良好道德风尚以及营造全社会的和谐舆论,这个“根本”是()
砂仁、白豆蔻皆可用治()(2010年第143题)
肺内压的叙述,错误的是
《饮片标准通则(试行)》规定蜜炙品类含水分不得超过
麻黄连翘赤小豆汤合五味消毒饮治疗水肿的证候是()。
贷款发放的第一道关口是()
根据永久收入理论,永久收入的边际消费倾向应该()当前边际消费倾向。
根据以下资料,回答下列问题。某机械加工企业下设四个生产车间生产加工同种类型和型号的产品,并以人均产量评价劳动生产率。车间劳动生产率从高到低依次排列正确的是:
热烈拥抱
Oneofthemosteminentofpsychologists,ClarkHull,claimedthattheessenceofreasoningliesintheputtingtogetheroftwo
最新回复
(
0
)