首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward.
admin
2011-02-11
24
问题
Imagine a chart that begins when man first appeared on the planet and tracks the economic growth of societies from then forward. It would be a long, flat line until the late 16th or early 17th century, when it would start trending upward. Before then the fruits of productive labor were limited to a few elites -- princes, merchants and priests. For most of humankind life was as the English philosopher Thomas Hobbes famously described it in 1651 -- "solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short". But as Hobbes was writing those words, the world around him was changing. Put simply, human beings were getting smarter.
People have always sought knowledge, of course, but in Western Europe at that time, men like Galileo, Newton and Descartes began to search systematically for ways to understand and control their environment. The scientific revolution, followed by the Enlightenment, marked a fundamental shift. Humans were no longer searching for ways simply to fit into a natural or divine order, but they were seeking to change it. Once people found ways to harness energy -- using steam engines -- they were able to build machines that harnessed far more power than any human or horse could ever do. And people could work without ever getting tired. The rise of these machines drove the Industrial Revolution, and created a whole new system of life. Today the search for knowledge continues to produce an ongoing revolution in the health and wealth of humankind.
If the rise of science marks the first great trend in this story, the second is its diffusion. What was happening in Britain during the Industrial Revolution was not an isolated phenomenon. A succession of visitors to Britain would go back to report to their countries on the technological and commercial innovations they saw them. Sometimes societies were able to learn extremely fast, as in the United States. Others, like Germany, was benefited from starting late, leapfrogging the long-drawn-out process that Britain went through.
This diffusion of knowledge accelerated dramatically in recent decades. Over the last 30 years we have watched countries like Japan, Singapore, South Korea and now China grow at a pace that is three times that of Britain or the United States at the peak of the Industrial Revolution. They have been able to do this because of their energies and exertions, of course, but also because they cleverly and perhaps luckily adopted certain ideas about development that had worked in the West -- reasonably free markets, open trade, a focus on science and technology, among them.
The diffusion of knowledge is the dominant trend of our time and goes well beyond the purely scientific. Consider the cases of Turkey and Brazil. if you had asked an economist 20 years ago how to think about these two countries, he would have explained that they were classic basket-case, Third World economies, with triple-digit inflation, soaring debt burdens, a weak private sector and snail’s-pace growth. Today they are both remarkably well managed, with inflation in single digits and growth above 5 percent. And this shift is happening around the world. From Thailand to South Africa to Slovakia to Mexico, countries are far better managed economically than they have ever been. Even in cases where political constraints make it difficult to push far-reaching reforms, as in Brazil, Mexico or India, governments still manage their affairs sensibly, observing the Hippocratic oath not to do any harm.
We are sometimes reluctant to believe in progress. But the evidence is unmistakable. The management of major economies has gotten markedly better in the last few years. Careful monetary policy has tempered the boom-and-bust economic cycles of the industrial world, producing milder recessions and fewer shocks. Every day one reads of a new study comparing nations in everything from Internet penetration to inflation. All these studies and lists are symbols of a learning process that is accelerating, reinforcing the lessons of success and failure. Call it a best-practice world.
I realize that the world I am describing is the world of the winners. There are billions of people, locked outside global markets, whose lives are still accurately described by Hobbes’s cruel phrase. But even here, there is change. The recognition of global inequalities is more marked today than ever before, and this learning is forcing action. There is more money being spent on vaccines and cures for diseases in Africa and Asia today than ever before in history. Foreign-aid programs face constant scrutiny and analysis. When things don’t work, we learn that, too, and it puts a focus either on the aid program or on local governments to improve.
This may sound overly optimistic. There are losers in every race, but let not the worries over who is winning and losing the knowledge race obscure the more powerful underlying dynamic: knowledge is liberating. It creates the possibility for change and improvement everywhere. It can create amazing devices and techniques, save lives, improve living standards and spread information. Some will do well on one measure, others on another. But on the whole, a knowledge-based world will be a healthier and richer world.
The caveat I would make is not about one or another country’s paucity of engineers or computers. These problems can be solved. But knowledge is not the same thing as wisdom. Knowledge can produce equally powerful ways to destroy life, intentionally and unintentionally. It can produce hate and seek destruction. Knowledge does not by itself bring any answer to the ancient Greek question "What is a Good Life?" It does not produce good sense, courage, generosity and tolerance. And most crucially, it does not produce the farsightedness that will allow us all to live together -- and grow together -- on this world without causing war, chaos and catastrophe. For that we need wisdom.
According to the passage, Japan’s success can be attributed to all EXCEPT ______.
选项
A、it’s own effort
B、ideas adopted from the west
C、diffusion of science and technology
D、successful foreign trade
答案
D
解析
细节题。出自原文第四段,采用排除法解题。第四段提到,日本、新加坡、韩国和中国发展迅速的原因有:自己的努力(energies and exertions),吸取西方成功经验(adopted certain ideas about development that had worked in the West),而后者则是知识传播的必然结果(此段第一句),故排除A、B、C,选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ageO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
AcupunctureRecently,acupuncturehasbecomea【1】_____wordinAmerica.【1】_____.AcupuncturewasperformedinChina
WHYSHOULDanyonebuythelatestvolumeintheever-expandingDictionaryofNationalBiography?Idonotmeanthatitisbad,as
A、therapidgrowthinworldoilconsumptionB、theriseofChinaandIndiaC、theconstructionofnewpipelinesisbecomingmored
TherepublicanmovementhasbeengatheringmomentuminAustraliasincebecamePrimeMinisterin199
1Whilethemissionofpublicschoolshasexpandedbeyondeducationtoincludesocialsupportandextra-curricularactivities
The,ScarletLetterbyHawthorneismainlyconcernedwith______.
Canada’sparliamentconsistsof______,theSenateandtheHouseofCommons.
随机试题
不符合气逆证表现的是
Ⅲ型主动脉夹层的病变起源于()远端,并向远端扩展,可直至腹主动脉。
关于高血压性心脏病的征象,错误的是
患者,男性,45岁。阵发性右腹绞痛1天,伴恶心、呕吐,无发热,腹痛发作时向右下腹放射,伴尿频、尿痛等症状。查体:腹软,右下腹有压痛,无反跳痛,膀胱区不胀。血WBC正常,尿常规WBC0~1个/HP,RBC7~10个/HP。最可能的诊断是(
某孕妇,孕39周,孕妇于胎动时感觉腹痛,检查时发现宫高、腹围小于同期正常妊娠孕妇,子宫的敏感度较高,轻微的刺激即可引起宫缩,临产后阵痛剧烈,宫缩不协调,宫口扩张缓慢,产程延长。临床诊断为羊水过少。针对该孕妇,下列护理措施不正确的是(
下列哪些属于拒不执行判决裁定罪之“有能力执行而拒不执行,情节严重”的情形?
某商业银行的财务指标如下表所示(单位:亿元)根据以上资料,回答下列问题:该银行的资本利润率为()。
我国东北地区某重工业城市产业结构调整期间.人口增长在10年中出现了下图所示状况。读图完成下列问题。伴随图中所示的人口变化,该城市()。
甲将自己的一辆机动车卖给乙,双方货款两清,但未办理变更登记,乙驾车撞伤丙,应负全责,保险赔偿后尚有不足。对不足部分的赔偿,应当采取的处理方式是()
Awomanwasatthecinema,andshewasenjoyingthefilmverymuch.Buttherewasamaninthenextseat,andhebeganlookingo
最新回复
(
0
)