首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build
admin
2017-03-15
43
问题
In Britain’s overheated property market, the only things hotter than the prices of the houses for sale are the firms that build them. On March 26th Taylor Woodrow and George Wimpey agreed upon a £5 billion ($9.8 billion) merger to create the country’s largest housebuilder.
The financial logic of the deal seems hard to fault. Last year the two firms built about 22,000 homes in Britain, a tenth of all completions. Together they will be able to trim costs by more than £70 million a year and they will be in a stronger position in America, where they have operations in Florida, California, Arizona and Texas.
The merger may be the biggest of its kind but it is not the first, as a wave of consolidation sweeps through the industry. Of the country’s ten biggest builders in 2002, only six remain. The rest have been taken over by the three largest firms. Four years ago the top three firms controlled about 20% of the market; now they have around 30%.
The upheaval is transforming an industry that Kate Barker, a member of the Bank of England’s monetary-policy committee, heavily criticised in 2004. Ms. Barker was investigating why the supply of new houses had responded so sluggishly to the house-price boom, with completions actually falling to a low of about 175,000 in 2001, although they have since staged a recovery. One reason she highlighted was a fragmented and inefficient industry, whose firms competed not for customers by offering better homes or building them more cheaply but for that scarce British commodity, land with permission to develop. Local firms dominated their regions because they often stood a better chance of gaming the planning system than their national rivals. Quality often suffered because demand was so great that builders could sell all but the shoddiest of homes.
Two things have since changed. First, publicly quoted builders now look vulnerable to takeovers from rivals or private-equity firms because rising house prices have pushed up the value of their land faster than their share prices. This is partly because they value land on their books at its historic purchase price, rather than its current price. So it has often been cheaper to get land by pouncing on a rival than by buying it on the open market, says Kate Moy, an analyst at Teather & Greenwood, a stockbroker.
The second change is that Britain may soon weaken longstanding rules that have preserved "green belts" around towns and cities. Another report by the energetic Ms Barker, released in December, argued that farms and parks will have to be concreted over to provide living space for an extra 209,000 new households each year over the next two decades. One consequence is that firms may soon be able to buy land in suburb-sized chunks.
The potential change has sparked a flurry of interest in land adjoining towns and cities that may be reclassified. That seems to be shifting the balance of power from local builders to large firms with enough capital to buy rights to huge tracts of land. A sign of the shift, says Peter Damesick, head of research at CB Richard Ellis, is that even institutional investors with little previous experience are now getting into the game of speculating on town-edge land.
With interest in land running high the merger between George Wimpey and Taylor Woodrow is unlikely to be the last, if indeed it proceeds. Other builders and private-equity firms are running their slide-rules over the two companies, whose shares have gained on optimism that a counterbid may emerge. And several smaller housebuilders are also expected to fall to bids soon. Given the industry’s generally shoddy customer service, few of them will be missed.
What are the changes?
选项
答案
Publicly quoted builders now look vulnerable to takeovers from rivals or private-equity firms because rising house prices have pushed up the value of their land faster than their share prices. Britain may soon weaken "green belts" around towns and cities. Firms may soon be able to buy land in suburb-sized chunks.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/auSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Thisisanabidingcomplaintamongyoungmeninacountrywithasurfeitofconsensus.
Itisirrationalfortheparentsto________allthehopesontheirchildren.
Seekingtoframehisnewadministrationasonewithafirmfocusonclosingthegapbetweenchildrenfromaffluentandpoorfami
Havingmorethan800minternetusersmeansthecountryhasanoverabundanceofdata,amostimportantinputforAIservices.
当前,亚欧两地区都处于蓬勃发展的阶段。亚洲是世界上最具经济活力的地区,资源丰富,市场广阔,区域合作方兴未艾。欧盟是世界上最大的发达经济体,资本充裕,科技先进,一体化程度高。两地区政治上共识很多,经济上优势互补,文化上各具特色,为开展更广泛和具有实质性的对话
尊敬的普京总理,女士们,先生们,朋友们:很高兴与老朋友普京总理共同出席第三届中俄经济工商界高峰论坛。“新局面、新水平”这个主题寓意深远,高度概括了中俄经贸关系面-临的形势和任务。我衷心祝愿本届论坛取得圆满成功!//2008年是中俄关系继
OneofthegreatlegacieswillbetheimpactoftheGamesonthecountry’syoungpeople.TheGamesinspireanewgenerationtob
国有商业银行在市场化转型中已经取得重大进展。新增贷款质量明显好转,存量信贷结构有所优化,机构、人员得到精简,技术与业务创新能力增强,国际化经营步伐加快,资产质量出现了实质性好转,经营效益连创历史最好水平,与国际商业银行的差距正在不断缩小。//伴随
A、20%.B、15%.C、10%.D、9%.C根据题干要求可从原文中找到全球旅游业和GDP(国内生产总值)之间的关系。原文第一句提到“Globaltourism...represents10percentofworldGDP...”,
随机试题
为什么要用手柄置零的方式启动吊车?
建筑施工企业的管理人员违章指挥、强令职工冒险作业,因而发生重大伤亡事故或者造成其他严重后果的,依法追究( )责任。
某工程单代号网络图如下,说法正确的是( )。
背景资料某高速公路N合同段段路基工程施工,工期18个月,其中K23+200-K32+200路段以填方为主,合同段附近地表土主要是高液限黏土(液限值在38-49之间),在较远地带分布有膨胀土、沼泽土、盐渍土、有机土、粉土、砂性土等。出于控制造价的考虑,业主
采用信用证交付方式,单证的交付是指出口商在规定的时间内将全套单据连同正本信用证通过出口地银行寄给开证行,以便开证行付款。()
作为国家主人和领导力量的工人阶级是指工人队伍中的()。
甲为患者,在医院输血过程中,因血浆含有病毒,导致甲感染艾滋病毒,为此引起纠纷。下列表述正确的是()。
中华人民共和国国务院可依法制定()。
假如程序员可用的存储空间为4MB,则程序员所用的地址为(4),而真正访问内存的地址称为(5)。
Peoplegothereformeals.Peoplestudythingsthere.
最新回复
(
0
)