首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
admin
2019-03-10
17
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases.
What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim、major tax overhaul 和Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况等,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bA5K777K
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
HowmanypeoplewerekilledintheaccidentinadditiontoRobertSanchez?
Inonedayatalibrary,64peopleborrowedbooks.Twiceasmanypeopleborrowedonlyathrillerasborrowedonlyasciencefict
ThenativepeopleofNorthandSouthAmericaweregiventhename"Indians"bythe【21】ChristopherColumbus.Hethoughthehadre
Iftwotypistscantypetwopagesintwominutes,howmanytypistswillittaketotype18pagesinsixminutes?
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextratimeforhisschoolwork,AndyKliseadmitshewouldp
A、They’dhavetogetpermission.B、Jackwouldn’tlikeit.C、Shethinksitmightwork.D、Theotherassistantsshouldbeconsulted
BerrywasshockedinRiobecause______.
Singletons,referringtothosewholivealone,arebeingcomfortedbywell-meaningfriendsandfamilyandtoldthatnothavinga
Whenwasthelasttimeyoucomeoutofaverysuccessful【M1】______filmandreallyfeltyou’dgotyourmoney’sworthy?It’s【M2
"Successfulcloningofanincreasingnumberofspeciesconfirmsthegeneralimpressionthatitwouldbepossibletocloneanyma
随机试题
颈外静脉是由
A.SMB.PZAC.EMBD.RFPE.PAS能引起可损害第Ⅷ对颅神经的是
对中性点非直接接地系统的电压互感器,需要检查和监视一次回路单相接地时,应选用三相五柱或三个单相式电压互感器,其剩余绕组额定电压应为多少?
历史文化街区的保护范围应当包括历史建筑物、构筑物和风貌环境所组成的核心地段,以及为确保该地段的风貌、特色完整性而必须进行()的地区。
关于X射线探伤的优缺点,说法正确的有()。
宜采用锤击沉桩的情况是()。
下列关于团体凝聚力的描述不正确的是()。
《中华人民共和国义务教育法》第十一条规定,“凡年满六周岁的儿童,其父母或者其他法定监护人应当送其入学接受并完成义务教育”。其中,“年满六周岁”是本条教育法律规范结构的()。
智者的另一名称是()
(2008年单选40)按照中国古代“准五服以制罪”的刑法原则,相对于侵犯一般人而言,法律对侄子殴打叔父行为的处罚()。
最新回复
(
0
)