首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology
admin
2013-01-20
81
问题
Between the invention of agriculture and the commercial revolution that marked the end of the Middle Ages, wealth and technology developed slowly indeed. Medieval historians tell of the centuries it took for key inventions like the watermill or the heavy plow to diffuse across the landscape. During this period, increases in technology led to increases in the population, with little if any appearing as an improvement in the median standard of living.
Even the first century of the industrial revolution produced more "improvements" than "revolutions" in standards of living. With the railroad and the spinning and weaving of textiles as important exceptions, most innovations of that period were innovations in how goods were produced and transported, and in new kinds of capital, but not in consumer goods. Standards of living improved but styles of life remained much the same.
The eighteenth and nineteenth centuries saw a faster and different kind of change. For the first time, technological capability outran population growth and natural resource scarcity. By the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the typical inhabitant of the leading economies—a British, a Belgian, an American, or an Australian had perhaps three times the standard of living of someone in a pre-industrial economy.
Still, so slow was the pace of change that people, or at least aristocratic intellectuals, could think of their predecessors of some two thousand years before as effectively their contemporaries. Marcus Tullius Cicero, a Roman aristocrat and politician, might have felt more or less at home in the company of Thomas Jefferson. The plows were better in Jefferson’s time. Sailing ships were much improved. However, these might have been insufficient to create a sense of a qualitative change in the order of life for the elite. Moreover, being a slave of Jefferson was probably a lot like being a slave of Cicero.
So slow was the pace of change that intellectuals in the early nineteenth century debated whether the industrial revolution was worthwhile, whether it was an improvement or a degeneration in the standard of living. Opinions were genuinely divided, with as optimistic a liberal as John Stuart Mill coming down on the "pessimist" side as late as the end of the 1840s.
In the twentieth century, however, standards of living exploded. In the twentieth century, the magnitude of the growth in material wealth has been so great as to make it nearly impossible to measure. Consider a sample of consumer goods available through Montgomery Ward in 1895 when a one-speed bicycle cost $65. Since then, the price of a bicycle measured in "nominal" dollars has more than doubled (as a result of inflation). Today, the bicycle is much less expensive in terms of the measure that truly counts, its "real" price: the work and sweat needed to earn its east. In 1895, it took perhaps 260 hours’ worth of the average American worker’s production to amass enough money to buy a one-speed bicycle. Today an average American worker can buy one—and of higher quality—for less than 8 hours worth of production.
On the bicycle standard (measuring wealth by counting up how many bicycles the labor can buy) the average American worker today is 36 times richer than his or her counterpart was in 1895. Other commodities would tell a different story. An office chair has become 12.5 times cheaper in terms of the time it takes the average worker to produce enough to pay for it. A Steinway piano or an accordion is only twice as cheap. A silver teaspoon is 25 percent more expensive.
Thus the answer to the question "How much wealthier are we today than our counterparts of a century ago?" depends on which commodities you view as important. For many personal services—having a butler to answer the door and polish your silver spoons—you would find little difference in average wealth between 1895 and 1990: an hour of a butler’s time costs about the same then as now. For mass-produced manufactured goods—like bicycles—we are wealthier by as much as 36 times.
The sentence "Moreover, being a slave of Jefferson was probably a lot like being a slave of Cicero."
选项
A、shows that the author believes that slaves were commodities.
B、reveals that lower class people in the nineteenth century were really slaves.
C、reinforces the idea that the quality of life really had not changed much over the centuries.
D、comments on the long-lasting effects of slavery from Roman times.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bZ2O777K
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Scientistsgenerallyholdthatlanguagehasbeensolonginusethatthelengthoftimewritingisknowntocoveris_____incomp
Thehighunemploymentratesoftheearly1960soccasionedaspiriteddebatewith,intheeconomicsprofession.Onegroupfoundth
Hegavehisworktohisfriendto_____,becausehefoundithardtoseehisownmistakes.
Heisadefiantprotectorofhisideas.Anyrivalingthoughtwouldbecomehistarget.Withhispersuasiveskillshecanprovide
The______familyinChinesecitiesnowspendsmoremoneyonhousingthanbefore.
Mostenvironmental_______—fromclimatechangestofreshwaterandforesthabitatloss—havebecomemarkedlyworse.
Edisontestedmorethanonethousandmaterialstoseeiftheycould_____electriccurrentandglow.
Ropepossessestheattributesofflexibilityand,perunitofweight,uncommonlygreatstrength.
Thesportofwrestlingtests______,strength,andstamina.
HeswallowshiswordssomuchthatIcannever______whatheissaying.
随机试题
进入现代化的社会化大生产以后,政府的社会管理职能日益繁重,传统的经验管理方法已不再适用,必须借助于制度规范、科技手段来确立现代行政组织的自身管理方法。这里体现了行政组织自身管理方法的
关于脑血管意外患者心电图改变的论述,不正确的是
以下对艾司唑仑的描述不正确的是
A.支气管哮喘B.支气管扩张C.慢性支气管炎、肺气肿D.支气管肺癌E.特发性肺间质纤维化双肺布满哮鸣音,呼气相延长
月(季)度施工进度计划包括()。
(2005年)小桥孔自由出流,桥下水深h与临界水深hc的关系是()。
关于处置采用权益法核算的长期股权投资,下列说法中正确的有()。
知识产权的基本内容包括()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 A观察可得,第一套图每个图形的线数都是二条,第二套图每个图形的线数都是三条,故选A。
SQL语言是一种______。
最新回复
(
0
)