首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
48
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
WhattypeofbusinessisFindersBuyers?
Whattypeofbusinessdothespeakersmostlikelyworkfor?
WhatwilltakeplaceonFriday?
Task8EducationalSponsorshipThecompanyyouworkforisconsideringfundingaregionaleducationalprojectfor16-18-year-old
Task4AttractingNewBusinessClientsYouworkforacompany,whichprovidesmeetingfacilitiesforbusinessclients.Yourdepa
StilesReductionYourcompanyisaninternationalcompanywhichproduceselectronicproducts.Yourcompany’ssaleshavereduced
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
•Youwillhearabankexperttalkingaboutsomeofthecommonmistakesthataremadewhenpeoplecompletelettersofcredit.•As
A.C.HunterBollC.Hunter13011hasbeenemployedbyThomasH.LeePartners,L.P.anditspredecessor,ThomasH.LeeCompany,
【C1】______adoubttherearecountriesthatofferinterestingadvantagesforentrepreneurs,selfemployedandbusinessowners.
随机试题
国家确定职业分类,对规定的职业制度职业技能标准,实行职业()制度。
编制管理的内容包括()
_______是反映卫生服务需要的一个指标。
少阴寒化证的临床表现是厥阴病证的临床表现是
小儿指纹色淡白,多属
人体内合成尿素的主要脏器是
某企业签订一项融资租赁合同,租赁期为7年,每年年末支付租金100万元,承租入担保的资产余值为50万元,与承租入有关的A公司担保余值为20万元,租赁期间,履约成本共50万元,或有租金20万元。独立于承租入和出租入,但在财务上有能力担保的保险公司担保的资产余值
2014年5月20日,甲施工单位与乙建材商签订了一份买卖合同。约定将工程完工后剩余的石材以10万元的价格卖给建材商,合同履行地为施工单位所在地,5月28日乙建材商根据合同规定交付定金2万元。由甲施工单位将石材送到指定地点,5月30日乙建材商收到货物,因部分
选择确定建立网站的方式有()。
天然产生的化学物质的结构一旦被公布,就不能取得这种化学物质的专利。但是,在一种天然产生的化学物质合成物被当作药物之前,它必须通过与人工合成药物一样严格的测试,最终在一份出版的报告中详细说明药物的结构和观察到的效果。如果以上陈述正确,则以下哪种说法
最新回复
(
0
)