首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a w
admin
2012-01-23
42
问题
Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while. Given that employers have been seeking help in their recruiting efforts for decades, it seems odd that the rise of RPO as a service solution has taken so long. Isn’t outsourcing of non-core functions a widely accepted business strategy? Isn’t recruiting one of the largest line items for many organisations and not a core function?
Today, however, organisations that consider outsourcing their recruiting efforts can pore over and compare tangible outcomes seen by those successful early adopters of RPO. But tread lightly. There have been a number of very public RPO failures where results have fallen woefully short of expcetations, sending business leaders and the marketplace back into the boardroom to debate yet again the viability and sustainability of the solution. Can RPO be truly successful? If there are companies out there who are reaping the proposed benefits of outsourcing, what are they doing that others are not? The fact is there are common elements—let’s even call them tenets—that when followed, can greatly increase the effectiveness and ultimate outcomes of the RPO solution. Before we look at those tenets, however, it’s it’s important to understand the history of RPO.
Recruitment process outsourcing is the culmination of an evolutionary process that started with third-party recruiters engaged at the line manager level or as an adiunct to an organlsatlon’s internal staffing initiatives. Utilising the approach was simple: call your preferred recruiter(s) with a job description and expect screened candidates to be sent to you. Overall, this process continues to serve as a highly scalable option in many talent acquisition strategms, but it is extremely costly. Moreover, based on the transactional nature of the relationship, it comes with high risk and little accountability for results.
Companies soon realised they could bring the same talent in-house as contractors—their intentions clearly centered on achieving the same scalability but with reduced cost and greater control of the outcomes. In practice though, this model proved to be almost as expensive as high agency utilisation and surprisingly, with co-employment and other new issues, even more complex. Worse yet, the rates for contractors continued to climb as corporate recruiters began to seek out these new, more highly paid "nomad" positions instead of their corporate roles. The desired "direct sourcing" impact these recruiters were supposed to have never materialized as skills, and innovative approaches floundered without the access to best practices and innovative techniques that contingency recruiting agencies cultivated.
At the same time, traditional recruiting providers began to assume a more prominent role in assisting their customers with new ways to handle huge spikes in hiring. Although this represented a new challenge for both companies and providers, the solutions were primarily project-based and, therefore, rarely focused on achieving strategtc improvements.
Over time, the RPO paradigm changed to finally justify its title, while providers literally began assuming delivery of an organisation’s internal staffing function. This early model was fraught with mistiming because most organisations treated RPO solutions like earlier transactional recruiting solutions. In addition, most providers simply weren’t ready to deliver at the levels they had signed up for. As the burgeoning industry learns from itself, organisations have honed their approach to RPO vendor management and some providers have refined their solutions to near industry-standard levels.
What can we learn about Recruitment Process Outsourcing in the first paragraph?
选项
A、All companies tend to outsource their not so important services.
B、It gained wide acceptance among the employers as soon as it came out.
C、Recruiting is an important department of many organisations.
D、It took a long time before RPO finally became popular.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段提到“Recruitment Process Outsourcing—better known as RPO—has gained significant market momentum in recent years. Yet it has taken a while.”即:招聘流程外包在近几年赢得了很好的发展势头,但是这个过程也花费了一段时间。所以,D项符合题意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/bo7d777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
Whatdidthemandorecently?
WhatdoesthecompanyplantodoinChina?
Accordingtothespeaker,whatdidthemayorrecentlydo?
Task4AttractingNewBusinessClientsYouworkforacompany,whichprovidesmeetingfacilitiesforbusinessclients.Yourdepa
Task4AttractingNewBusinessClientsYouworkforacompany,whichprovidesmeetingfacilitiesforbusinessclients.Yourdepa
FinancialManagement:theimportanceofmaintainingfinancialcontrolacrossalldepartments
•YouwillhearthespeechoftheManagingDirectoroftheInternationalMonetaryFundatthepressconference.•Asyoulisten,f
ALargeseverancepaymentwasmade.BApartnershipabroadwasformed.CNexttime,abetterscheduleneedstobearr
随机试题
影响绒毛膜癌预后的因素有()
同时履行抗辩权和后履行抗辩权的适用条件中完全一致的条件是()。
材料:某初中英语老师在批改学生作业时,竞写上“狗屁”二字,遭到学生家长发帖投诉。在发帖人贴出的图片上,可以看到这是一张英语试卷,试卷第六大项为阅读表达题,共3小题,每空1分,满分5分。这名学生3道题都做错了,5分全被扣了。在错误回答旁边,有红笔标
李楠,某中学“宏志班”的一位学生,在她刚15岁时,母亲病故,她悲痛万分。这个噩耗同样也震动着老师和“宏志班”里每一个同学的心。在老师的指导下,班长在征求意见后,让同学们自己制作白花,中间用一朵大白花,周围用53朵小白花扎成一个花圈,代表全班同学的心意,送给
人民法院的行政诉讼监督,主要是对公安机关及其人民警察()的合法性进行审查。
兽行
运算结果不是2010的表达式是
•Lookatthestatementsbelowandtheinformationaboutseminarsontheoppositepage.•Whichseminar(A,B,CorD)doeseach
A、Atafair.B、Atacafeteria.C、Inacomputerlab.D、Inashoppingmall.A本题为细节判断题,只要听清了女士的问句:Isthisthefirstyearyou’vebee
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledShouldStudyStillBeEmphasizedinUniversities?You
最新回复
(
0
)