首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Tell an investment banker that a picture bought in 1950 for $30,000 sold this month for $104.1 million and you will be unlucky i
Tell an investment banker that a picture bought in 1950 for $30,000 sold this month for $104.1 million and you will be unlucky i
admin
2011-03-10
30
问题
Tell an investment banker that a picture bought in 1950 for $30,000 sold this month for $104.1 million and you will be unlucky if you fail to get his attention. That was the case with the portrait of a young boy by Picasso when Sotheby’s dispersed on May 5 the tail end of the famous collection formed by the late John Hay Whitney and his wife Betsy Cushing Whitney. Sales added up to almost $190 million within two hours.
If you then go on to explain that Whitney bought the 1905 portrait not for investment but for art’s sake, because he loved 19th- and 20th-century painting, you might well be greeted with a stare of compassionate irony.
Yet that was exactly so. Had the heir to a vast fortune consulted experts at the time, most would have advised against the acquisition. Received wisdom in the 1950s had it that it was Picasso’s breakthrough in modern art that made him truly important, i. e. his early Cubist work.
The Picasso case, which is probably the greatest success story ever in the art market, neatly illustrates the financial gamble that buying art represents. The biggest winners are not investors, but art lovers with a great eye who follow their intuition.
Art cannot be an investment because perception determines everything. No two works are ever identical. One Picasso does not equal another Picasso. On May 6, one day after the Whitney sale, Sotheby’s was offering another five Picassos. All fetched different prices.
That night the market was on a roll and two of the Picassos sold extremely well. Even so, their diverging fates illustrate the impossibility of predicting prices. Presale calculations are frequently belied, up or down. "Le Nu Accroupi" (describing a seated woman), dated "21/24.6.59," was expected to bring $3 million to $4 million plus the 12 percent sale charge. Furious bidding sent it climbing to $11,768,000.
The second of the two most expensive Picassos sold within the expected price bracket, costing $14,792,000."Le Sauvetage" ("The ReScue") was painted in November 1932.This is seen as a seminal year. Why did it not arouse enthusiasm in proportion to the "Nu Accroupi" and increase the estimate by 250 percent?
One reason, in favor of the "Nu Accroupi", is that the figure of the seated woman is distorted in a manner that best fits the general public’s idea of what Picasso’s art looks like. The face broken up in separate halves that can be read as seen sideways or full front is typical of this stereotype even if in reality Picasso was the most versatile artist of his time.
Another reason works against "Le Sauvetage". A jarring note is introduced by the spiky rendition of the human figures. Moreover, some deem the composition to be loose. Others, by contrast, praise its rhythm. The argument can go on indefinitely. In short, no complete agreement is ever reached over the aesthetic characterization of a painting. Nor is there ever total agreement over the assessment of its importance relative to the artist’s oeuvre. How good within the 1932 style "Le Sauvetage" is will be seen differently by different viewers.
Cubism was a crucial phase of Picasso’s art in the view of virtually all art historians today and yet the-1909 to 1914 revolutionary works are not always well received by the public at auction.
Immediately before the "Nu Accroupi", a large charcoal sketch of a man’s head done by Picasso in 1909 in his first Cubist manner reflecting the impact that African sculpture had on its emergence came up with a $400,000 to $600,000 estimate. The drawing came from a European estate, and works with an estate provenance generally do well because they have long been out of sight. Moreover, it had previously passed through the hands of one of the greatest 20th-century dealers, Heinz Berggruen, while he was based in Paris. All to no avail. The drawing fell unsold, probably too ungainly for its art historical importance to weigh sufficiently in its favor. But both these characterizations are a matter of perception.
The last 4th paragraph tells us that ______.
选项
A、art collectors are mostly astute professionals
B、the public tend to simplify something not easily understood with a stereotype
C、Picasso never changed his unique painting style
D、the "Nu Accroupi" is Picasso’s best work
答案
B
解析
倒数第四段告诉我们什么?这题和第一题考的内容是一样的,关键是要认识到参加竞价的大多数并非专业人士,而普通公众对于一些高深的艺术思想或风格往往流于表面的偏见,stereotype(A conventional formulaic, and oversimplified conception, opinion, or image; especially: a standardized mental picture that is held in common by members of a group and that represents an oversimplified opinion, prejudiced attitude, or uncritical judgment)即是这个含义。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cHYO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】_______anotherkindofexaminationinadditionto
Foraclearerpictureofwhatthestudentknows,mostofteachersuse【M1】_______anotherkindofexaminationinadditionto
A、$18.1millionB、$25millionC、$39.4millionD、$41.5millionB
ThefirstAsaninvestmentbankerspecializinginmergersandacquisitions,FrancoisvonHurterspentalotoftimeinairportl
A、Sharondeclaredthathewouldresign.B、AnIsraeliwomanandherdaughterswerekilledbyPalestiniangunmenC、SomeLikudmemb
A、securingfinancialaidB、persuadingU.S.tocompelIsraeltowithdrawitstroopsfromtheoccupiedterritoryC、gainingU.S.re
Mentalhealthprofessionalmaybesurprisedtodiscoverhowmuchishappeningonlinetodayinthehealthcarefield.Workingclos
Mentalhealthprofessionalmaybesurprisedtodiscoverhowmuchishappeningonlinetodayinthehealthcarefield.Workingclos
Behindthebrewingwaroverprotectingpatients’recordsinanageofHMOsandonlinemedicine.Technologyisatwo-edgedswor
随机试题
1993年前后,王巢与邓莱共同创作了《商都嬗变3600}一文,并共同署名将该文发表于某杂志上。王某和邓某创作的作品《商都嬗变3600》属于不可分割合作作品。之后,邓某欲出版自己的个人专著。于是,1994年11月邓某与北京某出版社签订出版合同,约定出版社为其
A.乙酰胆碱B.肾上腺素C.去甲肾上腺素D.神经肽Y交感舒血管神经纤维末梢释放的递质为
嘌呤核苷酸从头合成的原料不包括
商业银行创造派生存款的条件是( )。
债务人乙公司财务情况恶化导致债权人甲公司发生坏账损失,包括两种情况:(1)2012年12月31日,甲公司根据掌握的资料判断,乙公司有可能破产清算,故按应收账款的10%计提坏账准备。甲公司一周后接到通知,乙公司已被宣告破产清算,甲公司估计有50%的债
2014年12月31日,甲事业单位财政直接支付指标数与财政直接支付实际支出数之间的差额为200000元。2015年年初,财政部门恢复了该单位的财政直接支付额度。2015年1月20日,该单位以财政直接支付方式购买一批办公用物资(属于上年预算指标数),支付给供
荷马时代的社会管理制度和经济生活。
Writeanessayof160-200wordsbasedonthefollowingdrawing.Inyouressay,youshould1.describethedrawingbriefly,
Ребятарассказывали,____ониотдыхалиуморяналетнихканикулах.
FromwhattheBrazilianbiologistsays,weknowthattouristslikeher______.FromthepassagewecanconcludethattheUShas
最新回复
(
0
)