首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. Thes
admin
2017-04-21
132
问题
Experiments have shown that in selecting personnel for a job, interviewing is at best a hindrance, and may even cause harm. These studies have disclosed that the judgments of interviewers differ markedly and bear little or no relationship to the adequacy of job applicants.
Of the many reasons why this should be the case, three in particular stand out. The first reason is related to an error of judgment known as the halo effect. If a person has one noticeable good trait, their other characteristics will be judged as better than they really are. Thus, an individual who dresses smartly and shows self-confidence is likely to be judged capable of doing a job well regardless of his or her real ability.
Interviewers are also prejudiced by an effect called the primacy effect. This error occurs when interpretation of later information is distorted by earlier connected information. Hence, in an interview situation, the interviewer spends most of the interview trying to confirm the impression given by the candidate in the first few moments. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that such an impression is unrelated to the aptitude of the applicant.
The phenomenon known as the contrast effect also skews the judgment of interviewers. A suitable candidate may be underestimated because he or she contrasts with a previous one who appears exceptionally intelligent. Likewise, an average candidate who is preceded by one who gives a weak showing may be judged as more suitable than he or she really is.
Since interviews as a form of personnel selection have been shown to be inadequate, other selection procedures have been devised which more accurately predict candidate suitability. Of the various tests devised, the predictor which appears to do this most successfully is cognitive ability as measured by a variety of verbal and spatial tests.
Which one is true about cognitive test?
选项
A、It tests the applicant’s verbal ability.
B、It tests the applicant’s spatial ability.
C、It is a more reliable way to test applicant suitability.
D、It is a hindrance to personnel selection.
答案
C
解析
本题是判断题。文中最后一段提到,由于3种心理效应的影响,仅仅靠面试来判断应聘者还是不够的,所以设计了其他的挑选方法来提高判断的准确性。认知能力测试(考查应聘者的口语能力和空间能力)就是比较成功的一种。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/cW9d777K
本试题收录于:
BFT阅读题库国际化人才外语考试(BFT)分类
0
BFT阅读
国际化人才外语考试(BFT)
相关试题推荐
Togenerateinterestinitsbusinessgifts,ABCcompanytakesanadintheJulyissueofPersonnelInternational,invitingreade
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Experimentshaveshownthatinselectingpersonnelforajob,interviewingisatbestahindrance,andmayevencauseharm.Thes
Accordingtothepassage,theattempttoeradicatetheAIDSvirusOtherscientistsarelookingatexperimentsthataresimilar
Doctorsaresurethatmoretest-tubebabiesaregirlsthanboys.Doctorswillmakemoretest-tubebabyexperiments.
Thepurposeoftheexperimentswastofundouthowtheclockworks.Thenormalhamstershadadailycycleof24hour,andthem
随机试题
A、Bycallingthecompany.B、Byaskingthesalesrepresentative.C、Bylookingatthepricelist.D、Bycomparingwithotherproduc
A.前置胎盘B.胎盘早剥C.子宫破裂D.胎膜早破E.脐带脱垂臀位破膜后易发生
影响硬膜外麻醉平面的主要因素有
治疗暑温痰蒙清窍型由痰浊内蒙引起的深度昏迷,痴呆状者宜选用治疗暑温痰蒙清窍型属痰火,实火引起的狂躁者宜选用
以下关于游离皮片移植的叙述哪项是错误的
石灰工业废渣稳定土施工前,应取有代表性的样品进行下列试验()。
背景材料:某机电设备安装公司中标一项中型机电设备安装工程,并签订了施工承包合同。工程的主要内容有静设备安装、工艺管道安装、机械设备安装等,其中静设备工程的重要设备为一台高38m、重60t的合成塔,该塔属于压力容器,由容器制造厂整体出厂运至施工现场,机电
正确开具发票应当做到()。
技术分析的假设中,从人的心理因素方面考虑的假设是()。
论述西欧十字军东侵的历史原因及后果。(东北师范大学2001年世界史综合卷真题;江西师范大学2013年世界通史真题)
最新回复
(
0
)