首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
admin
2022-10-18
49
问题
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
选项
A、Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
B、Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
C、Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
D、Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
E、States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
答案
D
解析
The argument suggests that passengers involved in automobile accidents in the United States typically are more seriously injured than those in Europe. Furthermore, in Europe, a different safety belt design is used. The argument suggests that these
European-style safety belts are more protective against serious injury than those used in the United States. Furthermore, it suggests that the United States would therefore benefit by adopting more stringent design standards for safety belts.
To clarify, the rate of severe injuries would indicate, for example, the number of seriously injured passengers per 100,000 passengers involved in automobile accidents. Note that this rate does not depend on the total number of passengers involved in automobile accidents.
However, many other factors could provide an alternative explanation for these differences in rate of severe injury. The question stem asks us which answer choice does NOT weaken the argument; in other words, we must find a factor among the answer choices that does NOT account for this difference in the rate of severe injury. Effectively, we will be looking for the answer that has no bearing on the rate of severe injury.
Which one of the statements given does NOT weaken the argument?
A This choice weakens the argument. It suggests the possibility that the difference in rates of severe injury is due to the number of people who actually wear safety belts in the U.S. versus in Europe. This rate is, of course, irrespective of the functionality of the belts themselves. In other words, the effectiveness of the belt design is irrelevant if the belt is not being worn in the first place.
B This choice weakens the argument. Training to understand how to minimize injury, rather than a safety belt design difference, may be a primary factor accounting for the lower severe injury rate in Europe.
C This choice weakens the argument. The fact that cars constructed in Europe are more sturdy may account for the lower severe injury rate in Europe rather than the difference in the types of safety belts used.
D Correct. This choice does not weaken the argument. The higher likelihood that one is involved in an automobile accident in the U.S. actually has no bearing on the higher rate of severe injury among passengers who are involved in automobile accidents. That is, the rate itself is a proportion of the total number of passengers involved in accidents rather than the number itself. This rate would remain the same whether 10 accidents or 10 million accidents occurred.
E This answer choice suggests that even implementation within the United States of the European safety belt design does not seem to change serious injury rates. This implies, of course, that some other factor is likely responsible for the differences in rates of serious injury between the U.S. and Europe.
The correct answer is D.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dFkO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantqu
Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutes60writeacompositiononthetopic"AnIncreasingNumberofPeopleareStudyingf
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
Imagineaschoolthatexpecteditsstudentstobecomeliteratewithoutanyformalinstruction.Mostparentswouldbealarmedby
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,thebases
Itisdifficulttoimaginewhatlifewouldbelikewithoutmemory.Themeaningsofthousandsofeverydayperceptions,thebases
Afterfirstexperimentaluse,youngpeoplecontinuetodrinkorusedrugsbecausetheybelievethesesubstancescanrelievebore
Imagineaschoolthatexpecteditsstudentstobecomeliterate(有读写能力的)withoutanyformalinstruction.Mostparentswouldbealar
Nobodycanbesetinmotionwithoutaforce______onit.
随机试题
《楚辞.九歌.国殇》之“国殇”的含义是()
女性,45岁,近1年来盗汗、心悸、易怒、食量增加。检查:突眼,心率110次/分,血压126/84mmHg,甲状腺弥漫性肿大Ⅲ度,心律齐、无杂音,举手颤动明显。查血T3、T4高于正常值。诊断为原发性甲亢,经抗甲状腺药物治疗后复发,拟行甲状腺双侧次全切除术。
萎缩性胃窦胃炎
竞争性抑制剂与酶结合的部位
基金市场的参与主体不包括()。
商业本票是指______、______开出的承诺在一定时期内支付一定数额款项的______。
(2017·山东)当代学校教育中的班主任必须实行由管理者角色向指导者角色的重心转移。()
2005年我国GDP为184937亿元人民币,主要能源生产总量为228.9百万吨标准煤,主要能源为原煤、原油、天然气和水风核电,分别生产177.2百万吨标准煤、25.9百万吨标准煤、6.6百万吨标准煤和19.2百万吨标准煤。“十一五”“十二五”时期我国主要
(2012年江苏)医生和营养专家都说,黄曲霉素比三聚氰胺更可怕,比砒霜毒性大几十倍,那么有什么食物能消减黄曲霉素对人体的危害呢?有专家撰文说,绿叶菜中的叶绿素能大幅度减少黄曲霉素的吸收率。一家著名的医学杂志在2007年刊登了一项研究,该
【31】经济带和【32】丝绸之路,简称“一带一路”,是由中国最高领导人习近平于2013年9月和10月分别提出的【33】概念,是一种跨国经济带。中国国务院总理李克强在亚洲和欧洲访问时进一步推广了“一带一路”概念,并写进了政府工作报告之中,成为中国对外的主要【
最新回复
(
0
)