首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
admin
2022-10-18
52
问题
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
选项
A、Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
B、Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
C、Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
D、Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
E、States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
答案
D
解析
The argument suggests that passengers involved in automobile accidents in the United States typically are more seriously injured than those in Europe. Furthermore, in Europe, a different safety belt design is used. The argument suggests that these
European-style safety belts are more protective against serious injury than those used in the United States. Furthermore, it suggests that the United States would therefore benefit by adopting more stringent design standards for safety belts.
To clarify, the rate of severe injuries would indicate, for example, the number of seriously injured passengers per 100,000 passengers involved in automobile accidents. Note that this rate does not depend on the total number of passengers involved in automobile accidents.
However, many other factors could provide an alternative explanation for these differences in rate of severe injury. The question stem asks us which answer choice does NOT weaken the argument; in other words, we must find a factor among the answer choices that does NOT account for this difference in the rate of severe injury. Effectively, we will be looking for the answer that has no bearing on the rate of severe injury.
Which one of the statements given does NOT weaken the argument?
A This choice weakens the argument. It suggests the possibility that the difference in rates of severe injury is due to the number of people who actually wear safety belts in the U.S. versus in Europe. This rate is, of course, irrespective of the functionality of the belts themselves. In other words, the effectiveness of the belt design is irrelevant if the belt is not being worn in the first place.
B This choice weakens the argument. Training to understand how to minimize injury, rather than a safety belt design difference, may be a primary factor accounting for the lower severe injury rate in Europe.
C This choice weakens the argument. The fact that cars constructed in Europe are more sturdy may account for the lower severe injury rate in Europe rather than the difference in the types of safety belts used.
D Correct. This choice does not weaken the argument. The higher likelihood that one is involved in an automobile accident in the U.S. actually has no bearing on the higher rate of severe injury among passengers who are involved in automobile accidents. That is, the rate itself is a proportion of the total number of passengers involved in accidents rather than the number itself. This rate would remain the same whether 10 accidents or 10 million accidents occurred.
E This answer choice suggests that even implementation within the United States of the European safety belt design does not seem to change serious injury rates. This implies, of course, that some other factor is likely responsible for the differences in rates of serious injury between the U.S. and Europe.
The correct answer is D.
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/dFkO777K
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutes60writeacompositiononthetopic"AnIncreasingNumberofPeopleareStudyingf
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
Notallmemoriesaresweet.Somepeoplespendalltheirlivestryingtoforgetbadexperiences.Violenceandtrafficaccidentsc
Notallmemoriesaresweet.Somepeoplespendalltheirlivestryingtoforgetbadexperiences.Violenceandtrafficaccidentsc
IftheDakotaAccessPipeline(输油管道)iscompleted,itwillcarrynearlyhalfamillionbarrelsofoilacrossfourstateseveryd
Scientistssaidtheyhavefoundevidenceofagiantplanetfaroutinoursolarsystem.Inastatement,theCaliforniaInstitute
Overtheyears,collegestudentshavestoodtogetherforwhattheybelievein,fromcivilrightstoanti-warpoliciestothemor
Imagineaschoolthatexpecteditsstudentstobecomeliteratewithoutanyformalinstruction.Mostparentswouldbealarmedby
AfterbeingtestedinmanyWays,thisnewly-designedmachinewill______inthenearfuture.
随机试题
漏洞险情的抢护方法有()。
某施工企业向某建筑材料供应商发出购买建筑材料的要约,该建筑材料供应商在承诺有效期内对该要约作出了完全同意的答复,则该买卖合同成立的时间为()。
下列表述中,不正确的有()。
套路运动(即武术套路)
有全国政协委员认为,坐上了政协委员这个位置,就不是个普通人,就得对究法负责,对国家和人民负责,并建议委员们对宪法宣誓。这说明()。
方老师在学生阅读英文绘本后,让学生观察、归纳文章的大意,在这个过程中教师主要是培训了学生______学习策略。
我国的残疾人事业总体呈现出梯次发展的格局,伴随着新中国的成立,基础日渐牢固,随着改革开放的逐步深入而不断发展,其既有传统的_________,也有政策的_________,还有时代的_________。依次填入画横线部分最恰当的一项是()
随着中国老龄化进程的不断加快,养老问题闲扰着不少普通的中国家庭。2012年全国老龄工作会议透露,截至2011年年底,全国60岁以上老年人口达到1.85亿,占总人口的13.7%。调查显示,居民对目前的养老保障现状有着深切感受,37.8%的受访者对中国养老保障
【B1】【B13】
Modernindustrialsocietygrantslittlestatustooldpeople.Infact,suchasocietyhasasystemofbuilt-inobsolescence.The
最新回复
(
0
)