首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
admin
2016-01-05
54
问题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumptions that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.
The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justice can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to, say, going through a suspect’ s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’ s smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestee’ s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of "cloud computing", meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
The author believes that exploring one’ s phone content is comparable to
选项
A、getting into one’ s residence.
B、handing one’ s historical records.
C、scanning one’ s correspondences.
D、going through one’ s wallet.
答案
A
解析
细节题。根据题干关键词exploring one’s phone content定位到第四段。由第四段第三句But exploring one’s smartohone is more like entering his or her home可知.A项“进入他的住处”是该句的同义转换,故选A项。B项“交出历史记录”、C项“浏览通信”和D项“检查钱包”均是文中所举的具体例子,只有A项与原文完全对应,具有概括性。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/djsZ777K
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
It’snotwhatThomasMcKayseesinthismachine,butwhatthemachineseesinhimthatdetermineshowwellhiseyesviewthewor
GoingonlineisafavoritepastimeformillionsofAmericanchildren.Almost10million(14percent)ofAmerica’s69millionchild
Inthedaysandweeksafter9/11anumberofwritersaskedwhatthefutureoffictioncouldbeaftersucharupture.Thecomment
Whentheleadersoftheneweconomysaythey’renotinitforthemoney,that’snotjustbadforbusiness.It’sbadforeveryone
"Bah!Humbug",wasScrooge’sopinionofcharitablegivingandeventodaysomeeconomistsreckoncharitygoesagainsteconomicra
TheInternet,e-commerceandglobalizationaremakinganeweconomicerapossible.Bythemiddleofthe21stcentury,capitalis
Bilingualeducationinschoolshaslongbeenapoliticalhotpotato—itwasbannedinCaliforniabya1998ballotmeasure,which
Parenthoodisn’tacareer-killer.Infact,economistswithtwoormorekidstendtoproducemoreresearch,notless,thantheir
Theword"science"isheardsoofteninmoderntimesthatalmosteverybodyhassomenotionofitsmeaning.Ontheotherhand,it
ThiswastheWorldCuptheFrenchwouldratherforget.TheBluesreturnedwithoutasinglegoaltotheircredit—anignominiousf
随机试题
影响加权算术平均数大小的因素包括()。
公司制企业的最高权力机构是()
下列选项中,不属于结脉主病的是()(2009年第22题)
下列关于2型糖尿病的描述中错误的是
大气环境质量现状监测数据分析,可采用( )表示污染物的时空分布特征。
《城市综合交通体系规划标准》将城市道路划分为大、中、小类,下列分类数量正确的是()。
对一个稍大一些的项目的组织结构应该进行()。
建设工程施工合同实质上是一种特殊的()。
财政部于2004年颁布了()。
下列叙述中正确的是
最新回复
(
0
)