首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A newspaper cannot publish for 174 years without some mistakes. This one has made its share. We thought Britain was safe in the
A newspaper cannot publish for 174 years without some mistakes. This one has made its share. We thought Britain was safe in the
admin
2018-01-01
67
问题
A newspaper cannot publish for 174 years without some mistakes. This one has made its share. We thought Britain was safe in the European exchange-rate mechanism just weeks before it crashed out; we noted in 1999 that $10 oil might reach $5; and in 2003 we supported the invasion of Iraq. For individuals, like publications, errors are painful—particularly now, when the digital evidence of failure is both accessible and indelible. But they are also inevitable. The trick is to err well: to recognise mistakes and learn from them. Worryingly, humanity may be getting worse at owning up to its goofs.
Few enjoy the feeling of being caught out in an error. But real trouble starts when the desire to avoid a reckoning leads to a refusal to grapple with contrary evidence. Economists often assume that people are rational. Yet years of economic research illuminate the ways in which human cognition veers from rationality. Studies confirm that people frequently disregard information that conflicts with their view of the world. Why should that be? Last year Roland Benabou and Jean Tirole presented a framework for thinking about the problem. In many ways, beliefs are like other goods. People spend time and resources building them, and derive value from them. Some beliefs are like consumption goods. Other beliefs provide value by shaping behaviour. The conviction that one is a good salesman may help generate the confidence needed to close sales.
Because beliefs are not simply tools for making good decisions, but are treasured in their own right, new information that challenges them is unwelcome. People often engage in "motivated reasoning" to manage such challenges. Mr. Benabou classifies this into three categories. "Strategic ignorance" is when a believer avoids information offering conflicting evidence. In "reality denial" troubling evidence is rationalised away: houseprice bulls might conjure up fanciful theories for why prices should behave unusually, and supporters of a disgraced politician might invent conspiracies. And lastly, in "self-signalling", the believer creates his own tools to interpret the facts in the way he wants; an unhealthy person might decide that going for a daily run proves he is well.
Motivated reasoning is a cognitive bias to which better-educated people are especially prone. Not all the errors it leads to are costly. But when biases are shared, danger lurks. Motivated reasoning helps explain why viewpoints polarise even as more information is more easily available than ever before. That it is easy to find convincing demolitions of climate-change myths, for example, has not curbed misinformation on the topic. But the demand for good (or bad) information is uneven. Polling shows, for example, that Democrats with high levels of scientific knowledge are more concerned about climate change than fellow partisans with less scientific background. Even, or especially, sophisticated news consumers look for what they want to find.
Work by Mr. Benabou suggests that groupthink is highest when people within groups face a shared fate: when choosing to break from a group is unlikely to spare an individual the costs of the group’s errors. If a politician’s fortunes rise and fall with his party’s, breaking from groupthink brings little individual benefit (but may impose costs). The incentive to engage in motivated reasoning is high as a result. Even as the facts on a particular issue converge in one direction, parties can still become polarised around belief-sets. That, in turn, can make it harder for a party member to derive any benefit from breaking ranks. Indeed, the group has an incentive to delegitimise independent voices. So the unanimity of views can be hard to escape until it contributes to a crisis.
Lowering the cost of admitting error could help defuse these crises. A new issue of Econ Journal Watch, an online journal, includes a symposium in which prominent economic thinkers are asked to provide their "most regretted statements". Held regularly, such exercises might take the shame out of changing your mind. Yet the symposium also shows how hard it is for scholars to grapple with intellectual regret. Some contributions are candid; Tyler Cowen’s analysis of how and why he underestimated the risk of financial crisis in 2007 is enlightening. But some disappoint, picking out regrets that cast the writer in a flattering light or using the opportunity to shift blame.
Public statements of regret are risky in a rigidly polarised world. Admissions of error both provide propaganda for ideological opponents and annoy fellow-travellers. Some economists used to seethe when members of the guild acknowledged that trade liberalisation could yield costs as well as benefits. In the long run, such self-censorship probably eroded trust in economists’ arguments more than it built support for trade. It is rarely in the interest of those in the right to pretend that they are never wrong.
What does Roland Benabou and Jean Tirole’s research tell us? What is "motivated reasoning" (para.4) ?
选项
答案
to study why people often "disregard information that conflicts with their view of the world" / why human cognition separated from rationality ("veers from rationality") / proposed a framework on the issue / people often rely more on "beliefs" built up by themselves and even derive values from such beliefs / for some people, beliefs have become "consumption goods" / used to make decisions / treasured by those people "in their own right"/ motivated reasoning divided into three categories: strategic ignorance, reality denial and self-signalling, / is a "cognitive bias" / people with better education are prone to such cognition / shared biases could lead to dangers + risks
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/eqSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Ifyouthoughtmultimediawassomethingtobeenjoyedintheprivacyofyourhome,thinkagain.Banksareonthefrontierofthe
西藏森林面积717万公顷,活立木蓄积量达20.91亿立方米,保存有中国最大的原始森林。为了保护西藏的生态环境,政府实行限额采伐,以严格控制森林的采伐规模,每年的商品性采伐量一直控制在15万立方米以内。//同时,对采伐基地进行及时更新,恢复森林植被。在影响长
JohnCiardigothismaster’sdegreefromtheUniversityofMichiganin1939andhaspublishedmorethan40poems.
A、tomeettheirbasicneedsinlifeB、toenjoyspendingmoneyC、foradifferentreasonfromtheonetheyclaimD、tosatisfythei
A、Indifferent,B、Intimate.C、Cooperative.D、Disappointing.C掌握词性变化。原文中使用了cooperation,而选项中却是cooperative。
Theneuroscientistdidastudyinordertotellwhetherchildrenwillfeelthepaindifferentlyiftoldhowitwillhurt.
与政府存在合约关系的美国公司经常面临这样的选择,究竟购买价格昂贵的本土产品,还是价格低廉的外来产品。如果公司选择购买本土产品,可能会因为未能把价格压低而激怒纳税人。但如果购买外来产品,则可能让美国工人面临失业危机。最近,美国国会通过法律,勒令与政府签过合同
自父母离异后,我从一个娇生惯养的孩子,转变成了一个通情达理的大学生。父母离异前,我指望着母亲服侍我。她为我洗衣、做饭、洗碗,甚至为我铺床。我15岁时父亲离开了我们,之后一切都变了。母亲找了份全职工作供养我们,我成了家里有时间做家务的人。另外,我在周末兼职挣
随机试题
影响期末基金单位资产净值的因素不包括()。
G市经济发达、教育资源丰富,许多在G市就读的大学生毕业后都选择留在G市工作生活。但在今年,G市周边的几个城市都出台了一系列针对大学生落户的优惠政策,许多G市大学生因此选择将户口迁往周边城市。由此可以预测,今年留在G市的大学生将会更容易找到工作。以
某地多日暴雪,甲在公交站等车时,站台顶棚因积雪过多塌落,将甲砸伤。该公交站站台系乙公司设计、丙公交公司管理。甲的损害应由
自动埋弧焊机发生焊丝在导电嘴中摆动,导电嘴以下的焊丝不时发红的现象与导电不良有关。
假如我们希望通过一个统计表就能较方便地了解处于某个分数以下的人数,这时可编制()
你是一家跨国公司投资部门的部门经理,主持公司在北美地区设立子公司的可行性研究。“9.11”事件后,你奉命去纽约考察两周,归来后将提交一份“9.11”事件对投资计划影响的专题报告。举出4种撰写报告时可供选用的研究方法。
关于小儿排尿问题,以下哪项错误
在某矿区内拟建设一座35/10kV变电所,两回35kV架空进线,设两台主变压器,型号为S9-6300/35。采用屋内双层布置,主变压器室、10kV配电室、电容器室、维修间、备件库等均布置在一层,35kV配电室、控制室布置在二层,请回答下列问题:其中有四
用未嵌入下部隔水层的地下连续墙,水泥土墙等悬挂式帷幕,并结合基坑内排水方法,与采用坑外井点人工降低地下水位的方法相比较,()是正确的。
基金托管人承担的主要职责包括有()
最新回复
(
0
)