首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisat
admin
2017-03-15
80
问题
Nobody has a good word for apathy. Arnold Toynbee, a historian, thought it defined the penultimate stage of decadence. Civilisations proceed, he said, from bondage to spiritual faith; from spiritual faith to courage; from courage to liberty; from liberty to abundance; from abundance to selfishness; from selfishness to apathy; from apathy to dependency; and from dependency back to bondage. Apathy is also anti-democratic: democracy requires the informed consent of the governed, and will not last if voters can’t be bothered.
Europe’s leaders also fret that apathy is anti-European. Popular indifference, they fear, leaves the European Union’s institutions vulnerable to the gusts of popular indignation. Their worry is understandable. The polling evidence, for what it is worth, shows that people who say they know a lot about the EU tend to support it. Those who know nothing and care less tend to be Eurosceptics. So governments and public institutions naturally seek to combat Euro-apathy as much as they can: by public-relations campaigns, by exhortations that Europe must dream (Jacques Delors’s admonition against indifference)—or by stunts such as last weekend’s birthday bash in Berlin to mark the 50th anniversary of the EU’s founding Treaty of Rome.
If apathy were indeed a threat to European integration, there would seem to be much reason to worry. Apathy is lolling about everywhere. Voter turnout has fallen in every election to the European Parliament since the institution was created. In the most recent one, in 2004, it slumped below 50%—a lower rate than India’s parliamentary polls. The gap between turnout in national elections and in European ones is widening, so the problem seems especially acute for the EU.
Britain’s Prime Minister, Tony Blair, has a website where people can file online petitions. It is an unscientific measure of popular concerns, but intriguing nonetheless. A recent petition asking Britain to hold a referendum on any EU constitution got a few thousand electronic signatures. One opposing road pricing got a few million.
It is hard to measure degrees of apathy non-anecdotally because people tend to react badly to polling questions such as "Do you care two hoots about the EU?" But lack of knowledge might be taken as a proxy for lack of concern. Here too the evidence is discouraging. Some three-quarters of Europeans, asked to rate their own knowledge of the EU, say it is modest or non-existent, and this share is rising, not falling.
Yet is it really true that apathy is an obstacle to European integration? A certain amount of apathy is understandable, perhaps inevitable. The EU’s institutions are remote and deliberately complex (deliberately in the sense that they seek to balance pan-European decision-making with national checks and balances). Most voters have no idea who represents them in the European Parliament and would not recognise a European commissioner if one turned up on their doorstep.
There are also reasons why apathy might have grown. Historically, the term entered common use after the First World War, when it was associated with shell-shock and depression. The EU is suffering from the bombshell when French and Dutch voters rejected the draft constitution in 2005. It can also be argued that economic sluggishness and high unemployment (at least until the current recovery) have led to a continent-wide depression.
More important, apathy has its compensations, especially for Europhiles. Without it, European integration would not have gone as far as it has. There was almost no debate about the content of the constitution in the referendum campaigns in Spain or Luxembourg, which approved it by wide margins. The voters who looked most closely at the text were in France and the Netherlands. Similarly, Britain debated the merits of the single currency more extensively than any other country. But Britain stayed out, while others adopted it without discussion.
European integration can proceed without popular enthusiasm because of its character: the EU has a large regulatory component and much integration proceeds through rules-based co-operation. Rules and technical standards are peculiarly unsuited to mobilising popular opinion, whether for or against.
Most people are content to leave them to experts. Integration by regulation proceeds under the voters’ indifferent gaze. In that sense, apathy is the Europhiles’ best friend.
Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, has learned this lesson. The "Berlin declaration" to mark the 50th birthday was written in secret and signed only by the EU’s own representatives: Ms. Merkel as holder of the EU presidency and the heads of the European Commission and Parliament. It seems likely that any revised constitutional treaty- will also be cooked up in semi-secret, with the aim of ratification by national parliaments, not referendums. Let sleeping voters lie.
But there is a further manifestation of apathy to consider: a behavioural condition associated with it, known as "learned helplessness". In 1965 a psychologist, Martin Seligman, subjected two groups of dogs to electric shocks. The first group could end the punishment by pressing a lever. These dogs recovered quickly; in a subsequent experiment, they learned to avoid further shocks by jumping a low wall. The second group had a lever that did nothing. They became apathetic and in the subsequent experiment simply cowered on the electrified floor, unable to escape the shocks. They had "learned helplessness".
In Europe, the treaties of Maastricht and Nice were rejected by Danish and Irish voters, only to be largely implemented later. If the constitution is successfully revived—a big if—it would continue this pattern. Some EU leaders may hope that, if they do this often enough, apathetic voters will learn that they are helpless to stop further integration, even when they want to.
What lesson does Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, learn?
选项
答案
European integration can proceed without popular enthusiasm because of its character. EU has a large regulatory component and rules-based co-operation. Rules and technical standards unsuited to mobilising popular opinion. Integration by regulation proceeds under the voters’ indifferent gaze.
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ffSO777K
本试题收录于:
NAETI高级口译笔试题库外语翻译证书(NAETI)分类
0
NAETI高级口译笔试
外语翻译证书(NAETI)
相关试题推荐
Grubbylittlemanhemaybe—heshitsinmypresencewithoutembarrassment—yetinhisthoughtIperceiveheisfastidious.
Still,takingtogether,China’seffortsareshapingatechnosystemquitedifferentfromanyintheWest.
Chinaisproudofitsachievementsaccomplishedthrough________effortsthroughalltheseyearssinceitsopeningofitsmarket.
女士们、先生们:我非常高兴能利用英中贸协年会的机会向英国工商界朋友们致以诚挚的问候。多年来,英中贸协一直关心和支持中英关系发展,是堪称两国友好交流的桥梁和互利合作的纽带。在此,我谨对英中贸协及诸位长期为促进中英经贸合作所做的不懈努力和杰出贡献表示
当前经济全球化不断发展,科学技术突飞猛进,为新世纪全球经济和社会发展提供了前所未有的技术条件。尤其是信息通信技术的发展,深刻地改变着人们的经济社会和文化生活方式。一方面,信息化为经济发展和社会进步提供了难得的数字机遇,而另一方面它也给我们带来了各
A、optimisticB、pessimisticC、cautiousD、unconfidentA通过支持性细节理解中心句中重要短语的含义。本题expect的正确含义,需根据其后句的支持性细节描写来判断。
A、Alackofbasicinfrastructure.B、Therecoveryeffortsaretooslow.C、ThetourismwillnotboostEastTimor’seconomy.D、The
Whichcountryexertsmosteffortsineducationalreform?
ChinaandGermanyshouldmakecommoneffortstoeliminatedifferencesbetweenthemsoastodeepentheirrelations.
舞蹈是一种普遍共有的文化表现。在许多文化里,舞蹈在节庆和宗教活动里占据中心地位。舞蹈还可以在求爱过程中起重要作用。
随机试题
网卡属于计算机的()
制剂含量测定结果的表示方法为
下列各项,不属异位妊娠保守治疗指征的是
【2012年第16题】如图3-535所示结构跨中A点的弯矩及挠度与右图结构跨中B点的弯矩及挠度相比,正确的是:
企业支付的下列保险费,不得在企业所得税税前扣除的是()。(2017年)
某航空公司为增值税一般纳税人并具有国际运输经营资质,2014年6月购进飞机配件取得的增值税专用发票上注明价款650万元、税额110.5万元;开展航空服务开具普通发票取得的含税收入包括国内运输收入1387.5万元、国际运输收入288.6万元、飞机清洗消毒收入
高中数学课程的具体目标之一是:发展数学应用意识和_______,力求对现实世界中蕴涵的一些________进行思考和作出判断。
根据以下资料,回答问题。2005—2010年股票、基金交易的户均交易量最大的是哪个年份?()
若向量组(Ⅰ):α1=(1,0,0)T,α2=(1,1,0)T,α3=(1,1,1)T可由向量组(Ⅱ):β1,β2,β3,β4线性表示,则(Ⅱ)的秩为_______.
NetWare的普通用户是由_______设定的。
最新回复
(
0
)