首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals.
admin
2019-09-23
30
问题
For more than 50 years, microbiologists in the U.S. and Europe have warned against using antibiotics to fatten up farm animals. The practice, they argue, threatens human health by turning farms into breeding grounds of drug-resistant bacteria. Farmers responded that restricting antibiotics in livestock would devastate the industry and significantly raise costs to consumers. We have empirical data that should resolve this debate. Since 1995, Denmark has enforced progressively tighter rules on the use of antibiotics in raising pigs, poultry and other livestock. In the process, it has shown that it’s possible to protect human health without hurting farmers.
Farmers in many countries use antibiotics in two key ways: (1) at full strength to treat sick animals and (2) in low doses to fatten meat-producing livestock or to prevent veterinary illnesses. Although even the proper use of antibiotics can inadvertently lead to the spread of drug-resistant bacteria, the habit of using a low or "sub-therapeutic" dose is a formula for disaster: the treatment provides just enough antibiotic to kill some but not all bacteria. The germs that survive are typically those that happen to bear genetic mutations for resisting the antibiotic. They then reproduce and exchange genes with other microbial resisters. Because bacteria are found literally everywhere, resistant strains produced in animals eventually find their way into people as well. You could hardly design a better system for guaranteeing the spread of antibiotic resistance.
The data from multiple studies over the years support the conclusion that low doses of antibiotics in animals increase the number of drug-resistant microbes in both animals and people. As Joshua M. Scharfstein, a principal deputy commissioner at the Food and Drug Administration, put it, "You actually can trace the specific bacteria around and ... find that the resistant strains in humans match the resistant strains in the animals." And this science is what led Denmark to stop sub-therapeutic dosing of chickens, pigs and other farm animals.
Although the transition unfolded smoothly in the poultry industry, the average weight of pigs fell in the first year. But after Danish farmers started leaving piglets together with their mothers a few weeks longer to bolster their immune systems naturally, the animals’ weights jumped back up, and the number of pigs per litter increased as well. The lesson is that improving animal husbandry — making sure that stalls and cages are properly cleaned and giving animals more room or time to mature —
offsets
the initial negative impact of limiting antibiotic use. Today Danish industry reports that productivity is higher than before. Meanwhile, reports of antibiotic resistance in Danish people are mixed, which shows — as if we needed reminding — that there are no quick fixes.
Of course, the way veterinary antibiotics are used is not the only cause of human drug-resistant infections. Careless use of the drugs in people also contributes to the problem. But agricultural use is still a major contributing factor. Every day brings new evidence that we are in danger of losing effective antibiotic protection against many of the most dangerous bacteria that cause human illness. The technical issues are solvable. Denmark’s example proves that it is possible to cut antibiotic use on farms without triggering financial disaster. In fact, it might provide a competitive advantage. Stronger measures to deprive drug-resistant bacteria of their agricultural breeding grounds simply make scientific, economic and common sense.
The author believes that______.
选项
A、Denmark’s experience can be generalized
B、measures should be taken to reduce bacteria
C、antibiotics protection is essential to animals
D、limiting the use of antibiotics has technical proof
答案
A
解析
观点题。第5段第6句“丹麦的例子就证明了在农场减少抗生素的使用不会引发金融灾难。”因此选择答案A(丹麦的经验可以普及)。注意考生易误选D,其实是对第5段第5句的误读,该句说到的“技术问题可以解决”是说我们可以找到对抗耐药细菌的办法,容易让人想当然地认为抗生素的限用有技术支撑。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/gVMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Whatkindofpeoplewereearlycolonialnewspapersdesignedfor?
WhendidIbeginmygenealogyresearch?
A、theirinfluenceonthereadingpublicB、theirreportsofstockmarketactivitiesC、themillionsofpaperssolddailyD、thetre
IMF’sConcernaboutZimbabwe’sEconomyVocabularyandExpressionsInternationalMonetaryFundmacro-economicfundamentals
StreetArtinLA.InLosAngeles,artistsareuncoveringsomeofthecity’shiddenculture.Severalphotographersare【L1】_
FightingAgainstHungerVocabularyandExpressionsmicronutrientsroadmapdonoragenciessmallholderfoodsecurityp
ReportersWithoutBordersReportersWithoutBorders(RWB)wasfoundedin1985inFrance.Atfirst,the【L1】______workedtopr
LatinAmericanandChineseofficialshaveopenedtwodaysoftalksontradeandinvestment.ThefirstChina/LatinAmericaand
AstudybyChineseresearchersshowsthat【C1】______couldhelpsmokersquitsmoking.Thestudypublishedinthe【C2】______PLOS
Bewasinterestedonlyinthestoryandskippedallthosepassagesoflandscapedescription.
随机试题
A.用法用量B.不良反应C.注意事项D.警示语欲查询接种预防性生物制品出现紧急情况的应急处理方法,在药品说明书中可查询
A.向前的动力B.向后的动力C.内外的动力平衡D.上下的动力平衡E.左右的动力平衡上、下牙弓密切面稳定的咬合接触关系
处方写锦纹应付()。
套期保值的本质是规避风险,以降低风险对企业经营活动的影响,实现其稳健经营。()
下列关于利率构成的各项因素的表述中,正确的有()。
债务人以非现金资产清偿债务时,影响债权人债务重组损失的项目有()。
预计ABC公司明年的税后利润为1000万元,发行在外普通股500万股。[要求](1)假设其市盈率应为12倍,计算其股票的价值;(2)预计其盈余的60%将用于发放现金股利,股票获利率应为4%,计算其股票的价值;(3)假设成长率为6%,必要报酬
某企业2015年的销售净利率为5%,经营资产销售百分比为60%,经营负债销售百分比为20%,期末净经营资产期初权益乘数为2.2,股利支付率为40%,该年没有增发新股,也没有股份的回购,则2015年的可持续增长率为()。
教师的行为在学生眼中往往具有放大效应。教师的“身正为范”不仅体现在品德课堂中,而且体现在学校日常生活的各个环节中。这是由教师劳动的()决定的。
Intranet正在成为一种流行的企业内部网构造模式,它是由传统Client/ Server模式结合(36)技术发展而来的。传统的Client/Server模式中面向大量用户的客户端由(37)所替代,其界面更为单一,也更便于用户使用。后端仍保留数据库服务器
最新回复
(
0
)