首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
50
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
veto
解析
动词。本题考查动词搭配。veto可与proposal搭配,该动词意思为“否决”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
IfWesternpeoplethinktheyarehealthyeaters,theywillhavetothinkagain.
EcotourismThinkingaboutgoingoffthebeatenpathforyournextvacation?Ifso,youmightbeoneofthemanypeoplewhoa
AsforthepeoplewhoseeyesstillfindthegreatreasonsbehindthetechnologyofdualSIMphonevague,youcanfindfivereaso
AsdawnbreaksinHanoithebotanicalgardensstarttofillup.Hundredsofoldpeoplecomeeverymorningtoexercisebeforethe
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
主张个人本身就是目的,具有最高价值,社会和他人只是达到个人目的的手段的是()人生观
A.甲型肝炎B.乙型肝炎C.乙型和丙型肝炎D.戊型肝炎E.甲型和戊型肝炎主要经粪~口传播的肝炎是
促进胆汁分泌的利胆药物是促进胆囊排空的利胆药物是
女性,50岁,餐后突发上腹痛8小时,伴寒战、高热。查体:体温40%:,脉搏120次/分,呼吸26次/分,血压90/60mmHg。精神萎靡,烦躁不安,皮肤巩膜黄染,右上腹肌紧张,可扪及胀大的胆囊,触痛明显,肝区明显叩击痛。白细胞计数21×109/L。首选
下列关于证据保全的说法错误的是?
下列情况中,一般不会使注册会计师对是否存在重大错报提出质疑的是()。
我国逐步健全的宏观调控体系应该是()。
A、 B、 C、 D、 C应该仔细观察图片中没有人以及桌子上物品的状态和位置。
Australia’sNationalDayfallson______,thedateofthefirstEuropeansettlementinAustralia.
EarnYourParent’sTrust1.【T1】ofprivilegesthatyouwant【T1】______Thereasonwhyparentsdon’tgiveyouprivilegesKidsmayu
最新回复
(
0
)