首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (
admin
2011-01-10
45
问题
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their (1) or their residency. But the proposal is set to (2) because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU. The Commission wants to (3) problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is (4) in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The (5) of member states are said to be (6) the idea and responded positively to a (6) which followed the (8) of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin (9) see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the (10) which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered (11) , a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be (12) quickly.
The Irish government’s (13) to the Commission on the Green Paper stated: "Ireland is not in favor of allowing (14) to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to (15) most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period." Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such (16) but could (17) the proposal in the Council of Ministers since (18) approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to (19) ," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the (20) of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
The Commission is expected to propose allowing people to choose which legal jurisdiction they would come under, based on their nationalities or their residency. But the proposal is set to run into difficulties because of the very different laws on divorce that apply across the EU.
The Commission wants to clear up problems over which law to apply when, for example, a married couple from one member state is resident in another member state or when the couple is of different EU nationalities.
The majority of member states are said to be in favor of the idea and responded positively to a consultation which followed the publication of a Commission Green Paper. With 15 percent of German divorces each year involving couples of different nationalities, the government of Berlin is particularly keen to see resolved the issue of which laws should apply.
But some member states are expected to resist the proposal which would involve allowing different divorce laws to be applied in their countries. For example, in Ireland where the divorce law states a couple must have been separated for four years, establish that their marriage has broken down and be offered mediation, a couple from Sweden could apply to an Irish court to allow them to divorce under Swedish law, where divorce can be obtained quickly.
The Irish government’s submission to the Commission on the Green Paper stated, "Ireland is not in favor of allowing spouses to choose the applicable law, as this could be open to abuse.., such abuse would be likely to impact most on divorce regimes, such as that of Ireland, which require a relatively long separation period."
Ireland, like the UK, however, is allowed to choose whether to "opt-in" to such a proposal under rules agreed in the Amsterdam treaty. Malta has no such safeguard but could veto the proposal in the Council of Ministers since unanimous approval will be required.
"It is going to lead to a two-tier situation," said Geoffrey Shannon, Irish expert on the Commission on European Family Law, which examines the harmonization of EU family law.
The proposal would also mean that judges would have to be trained in the divorce law of all 25 member states.
选项
答案
veto
解析
动词。本题考查动词搭配。veto可与proposal搭配,该动词意思为“否决”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hcuO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级口译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级口译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
SomepeopleaccusemeofbeingrudebecauseIalwaysintroducemyselftootherpeopleImeetontrains;butlanswerbytelling
Theirhostcarved,poured,served,cutbread,talked,laughed,proposedhealth.
Sincethereisnoevidencethathumancancer,asgenerallyexperienced,isinfectious,manypeoplebelievethatbecauseviruses
Almostfifteenortwelvethousandyearsago,afreshpeopledriftedintothesouthofSpain,andleftveryremarkabledrawingso
Improvedhumanwell-beingisoneofthegreatesttriumphsofthemodernera.Theageofplentyhasalsoledtoanunexpectedglo
WhenItellpeoplethatI’maprofessorofcommunication,theyoftenareconfused【C1】______whattheterm"communication"means.
随机试题
可收回金额
已知线性方程组(1)问a为何值时,线性方程组有唯一解、无解、无穷多解?(2)当方程组有无穷多解时,用其导出组的基础解系表示其通解.
患者男,55岁,右鼻持续性流脓涕,鼻塞5年余。检查见右鼻腔灰红色新生物,基底较广,表面不平,质较硬,触之易出血。该患者病检报告为“右鼻腔内翻性乳头状瘤"。应采取的治疗方法为
男性,62岁,3个月来发作2次右侧上下肢无力,每次突然发病,持续约10分钟后自行缓解。检查:血压正常,双眼底动脉反光增强,神经系统检查正常。辅助检查:血黏度增高,MRI检查未见异常患者需进一步检查的项目为
恶性淋巴瘤累及颈、腹股沟淋巴结、肝及肺,并伴有发热、盗汗及体重减轻,临床分期属
根据《中华人民共和国招标投标法》,可以不采用法定招标方式确定承包人的项目是()。
将同一鸡蛋分别浸入两杯密度不同的液体中。鸡蛋在甲杯沉底,在乙杯中悬浮。则:
在使用查询设计器创建查询时,为了指定在查询结果中是否包含重复记录(对应于DISTINCT),应该使用的选项卡是
Whilestillinitsearlystages,welfarereformhasalreadybeenjudgedagreatsuccessinmanystates,atleastUNisgettingp
Ifyouuseacomputeratwork,youprobablyalreadyknowthatalongdayof【B1】______yourscreencanleadtoeye【B2】______,ti
最新回复
(
0
)