首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Eating Our Young [A]At Feltonville School of Arts and Sciences, a middle school in a poor neighborhood of Philadelphia, the scho
Eating Our Young [A]At Feltonville School of Arts and Sciences, a middle school in a poor neighborhood of Philadelphia, the scho
admin
2016-12-18
58
问题
Eating Our Young
[A]At Feltonville School of Arts and Sciences, a middle school in a poor neighborhood of Philadelphia, the school year began chaotically as budget cuts took effect. With the cuts meaning no school nurse or counselor, teachers fill the gaps, disrupting lessons to help students in distress. And the problems are not small: A boy was stabbed in the head with a pencil by a fellow student: a girl reported sexual assault by an uncle: another refused to speak after the brutal murder of a parent. And that was just the start of the school year. To make matters worse, budget cuts are hurting essential academic programs.
[B]Across the United States, whether it’s schools, food stamps, health care or entry-level jobs, the young are feeling the force of government cutbacks. This year, the young and vulnerable especially have been hit hard through automatic federal spending cuts to programs like Head Start, nutrition assistance, and child welfare. Financial crises in cities like Philadelphia and Detroit have meant another wave of school budget cutbacks. And the weak job market is hurting the youngest workers most, with youth unemployment more than double the national jobless rate.
[C]This is not just an American problem. In Europe, too, rigid budgets are squeezing even basic education and health needs. As governments strain to cover budget shortfalls and appease(缓解)debt fears, the young are losing out. "We’re underinvesting in our children," said Julia Isaacs, a senior fellow at the Urban Institute and a child policy expert. "Looking at future budget trends and the fact that Congress doesn’t want to raise taxes, I can see children’s programs continuing to be squeezed."
[D]That has implications for long-term economic growth. Cutting back on the young is like eating the seed corn: satisfying a momentary need but leaving no way to grow a prosperous future.
[E]Is America overspending on its young? Public spending in the U.S. on children came to $12,164 per child in 2008, in current dollars, according to Kids’ Share, an annual report published by the Urban Institute. Of that total, about a third came from the federal government and two thirds from state and local governments. Compare that to what we spend on the elderly, which primarily comes from the federal government. According to the Urban Institute, public spending on the elderly, in current dollars, was $27,117 per person in 2008, more than double the spending on children.
[F]The trend is the same across the developed world. Julia Lynch, a political science professor at the University of Pennsylvania, studied 20 countries in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development between 1985 and 2000 and found each spent more public funds on the elderly than on the young. But there were large differences among them. She found the most youth-oriented welfare states were the Netherlands, Canada, Australia, and in Scandinavia, while the most elderly-oriented were Japan, Italy, Greece, the U.S., Spain, and Austria. Somewhere in the middle were Germany, France, Belgium, Luxembourg, and Portugal.
[G]Since the 1960s, federal spending on kids in the U.S. had been rising. That trend ended in 2011, when it dropped by $2 billion to $377 billion. A year later the figure plunged even more—by $28 billion. And spending on kids is planned to shrink further over the next decade. The Urban Institute has forecast that federal spending on kids will decrease from 10 percent of the federal budget today to 8 percent by 2023. That decline will occur even as federal spending is expected to increase by $1 trillion over the same period.
[H]So, what is the federal government spending on? The budget can be roughly divided in the following way: 41 percent goes to the elderly and disabled portions of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid: 20 percent to defense: 10 percent to children: 6 percent to interest payments on the debt: and 23 percent to all other government functions. So if spending on kids does fall to 8 percent of the federal budget, and if interest payments rise along with higher interest rates over the same period, the federal government soon will be spending more on interest payments on the debt than on children.
[I]What’s driving government cutbacks? Much can be tied to fears of rising national debt. Paradoxically, advocates of debt reduction claim they are acting in the interest of the young: our debts seem be too heavy for the next generation. But in a supercompetitive global economy, nations investing today in the well-being and education of the young are writing the success stories of tomorrow.
[J]Of course, the U.S. is investing in education. Roughly 65 percent of all public spending on kids is on education, and that’s done primarily through state and local governments. But whether it’s early childhood education, elementary, middle, or high schools, or universities and colleges, fewer resources are going into public education. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the number of teachers employed in kindergarten through year 12th grade, principals, superintendents and support staff, fell 2 percent between 2009 and 2011 while enrollment was steady.
[K]The trend of putting fewer resources into public education is even more striking at the college level. Take the University of California for example: The average annual student charges for resident undergraduates have increased 275 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars since 1990 to 1991, while the university’s average per-student expenditures have decreased 25 percent in inflation-adjusted dollars over the same period. So as California students pay much more for their education than their parents did, they’re getting less.
[L]Throughout the current downturn, unemployment has tailed the workforce. The hardest hit has been the young. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, unemployment for 16-to-24-year-olds in July was 16.3 percent. That compares with our national jobless rate of 7.3 percent. And there are also large numbers of the young who are underemployed. Gallup recently found that only 43.6 percent of Americans between the ages of 18 to 29 had a full-time job in June 2013.
[M]High youth unemployment has implications for future earnings power. Economists who study the labor market have found that people who graduate from school without a job are likely to have lower wages in their career.
[N]Even when the young land a job, investment in young workers isn’t what it used to be. Training and education used to be part of any full-time job. Now, while global companies like Google advertise staff training, they tend to be the exception. Most companies have cut back over the years as corporate budgets are reduced and companies believe they can buy talent rather than grow it.
[O]Whether because of government cutbacks or falling business investment, the young are facing tougher prospects than did their parents. And that raises irritating questions about the future. Starting with the youngest, without solid nutrition and basic health care, children can’t become engaged and active students. Without resources to teach and a secure support system, public schools can’t turn out educated, smart kids. With the costs of college rising beyond the reach of many, large groups are being left behind. And with entry-level jobs and training scarcer than ever, the human capital necessary to grow America’s huge economy isn’t being developed. The burden on today’s young to support an aging society will grow—even as the resources they are provided don’t.
Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics show that the jobless rate for the young in July is much higher than the national unemployment rate.
选项
答案
L
解析
根据the Bureau of Labor Statistics和jobless rate定位至L段。该段第3、4句提到,16至24岁年青人的失业率达16.3%,相比之下,全国的失业率为7.3%。本题是对这两句句意的归纳。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hxF7777K
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
Whenstudyinghumantalent,thetemptationisusuallytoconcentrateontheupperreaches.Understandablyso:wealladmirethe
Whenstudyinghumantalent,thetemptationisusuallytoconcentrateontheupperreaches.Understandablyso:wealladmirethe
Overthepastdecade,Americancompanieshavetriedhardtofindwaystodiscourageseniormanagersfromfeatheringtheirownne
Twonewgesture-sensinginnovationsdesignedforlargeelectronicscreensinpublicplacesherald(预告)afutureinwhicheverythin
J.CraigVenterandhiscolleaguesrecentlyannouncedthattheyhadcreatedthefirstcelltorunonafullyartificialgenome(基
Theincreaseinthemarginrate(保证金率)from50%to70%wasnotanattempttostemanyrampant(猛烈的)speculationonthepartofthep
A、ItisaplatformforsharingideasonteachingattheUniversityofIllinois.B、Itwasmainlyusedbyscientistsandtechnical
A、Theman’sideaofhavingapicnicisfantastic.B、Theweatherisgoingtochangegreatly.C、Theweatherreportisn’talwaysac
FarmsarespreadingtounusedcitylotsandoldpropertiesacrosstheUnitedStates.Theseurbanfarmsgrowcropsinareaswhere
A、Theyarenotasdangerousaspeoplethink.B、Theycanbeasfriendlytohumansasdogs.C、Theyattackhumanbeingsbynature.
随机试题
X线在真空中传播时,X线量的衰减与传播距离的关系是
某公路工程采用招标代理方式进行施工招标。在招标与施工阶段发生了如下事件:事件1:招标代理机构提出,评标委员会由7人组成,包括建设单位纪委书记、工会主席,当地招标投标管理办公室主任,以及从交通运输主管部门建立的评标专家库中随机抽取的4位技术、经济专
A公司将两辆大型运输车辆与B公司的一台生产设备相交换,另支付补价10万元。在交换日,A公司用于交换的两辆运输车辆账面原价为140万元,累计折旧为25万元,公允价值为130万元;B公司用于交换的生产设备账面原价为300万元,累计折旧为175万元,公允价值为1
卧薪尝胆:勾践
贫困常常使人想到低矮的土房、破旧的被褥、浑浊的双眼。这的确是生活在城市最低生活标准线下的贫困人家。男人病逝,欠下很多钱,两个孩子一个有点残疾,但他们家窗明几净,有冰箱、洗衣机,有漂亮的窗帘和门帘。女主人的笑容就像她的屋子一样明朗,她说,冰箱、洗衣机都是邻居
印象管理是指人试图控制他人对自己形成的印象的过程。一个人留给他人的印象表明了他人对其的知觉、评价,甚至会使他人形成对其的特定应对方式。因而,为了给他人留下好的印象,得到他人好的评价与对待,人会用一种给他人造成特定印象的方式来自我表现。印象管理的运用,尤其要
人权是人作为人所享有或应当享有的权利。法律的重要使命就是充分尊重和保障人权,不得以任何借口侵犯人权。人权的法律保障包括()
数据库系统的核心是
在使用基于优先数的不可抢占式进程调度算法的系统中,不会引起进程切换的事件恳()。
A、 B、 C、 B题目为询问为什么员工感到难以按照说明进行操作的Why疑问句。
最新回复
(
0
)