首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
How to solve the brain drain problem existing in universities in China has been a hot topic as our economy develops steadily. Th
How to solve the brain drain problem existing in universities in China has been a hot topic as our economy develops steadily. Th
admin
2020-01-15
16
问题
How to solve the brain drain problem existing in universities in China has been a hot topic as our economy develops steadily. The following excerpt offers some opinions on this issue. Read the excerpt carefully and write your response in about 300 words, in which you should:
1. summarize briefly the author’s opinions:
2. give your comment.
Marks will be awarded for content relevance, content sufficiency, organization and language quality. Failure to follow the above instructions may result in a loss of marks.
Every country sends out students. What makes China different is that most of these bright minds have stayed away. Only a third have come back, according to the Ministry of Education: fewer by some counts. A study this year by a scholar at America’s Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education found that 85% of those who gained their doctorate in America in 2006 were still there in 2011.
To lure experts to Chinese universities, the government has launched a series of schemes since the mid-1990s. These have offered some combination of a one-off bonus of up to 1m yuan($ 160,000), promotion, an assured salary and a housing allowance or even a free apartment. Some of the best universities have built homes for academics to rent or buy at a discount. All are promised top-notch facilities. Many campuses, which were once spartan, now have swanky buildings. The programmes have also targeted non-Chinese. A "foreign expert thousand-talent scheme" , launched in 2011, has enticed around 200 people. Spending on universities has shot up, too: sixfold in 2001 -2011. The results have been striking. In 2005 -2012 published research articles from higher-education institutions rose by 54% : patents granted went up eightfold.
But most universities still have far to go. Only two Chinese institutions number in the top 100 in the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. Shanghai Jiao Tong University includes only 32 institutions from mainland China among the world’s 500 best. The government frets about the failure of a Chinese scholar ever to win a Nobel Prize in science.
Pulling some star scholars back from abroad will not be enough to turn China into an academic giant. Many of those who return do so on a part-time basis. According to David Zweig of the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, nearly 75% of Chinese nationals who were lured by a "thousand-talent programme" launched in 2008 did not give up tenure elsewhere. Such schemes have often bought reputation rather than better research. They typically target full professors whose more productive, innovative years may already be behind them.(They also favour experts in science, technology and management.)
Chinese universities have great difficulty fostering talent at home. The premium on foreign experience in China has created perverse incentives, says Cao Cong of Nottingham University in Britain. It sends the message to today’s best and brightest students that they should still spend their most productive years abroad. More than 300,000 students leave each year.
Today the signs are more encouraging. Some universities are changing the way they recruit and hence finding it easier to attract staff from abroad. At Peking University departments now hire and promote using international evaluation methods. They advertise jobs and academics apply for promotion and are rewarded according to their achievements.
Write your response on ANSWER SHEET FOUR.
选项
答案
How to Solve the Brain Drain Problem? To solve the brain drain problem, especially those with an overseas academic experience, China has been taking many measures which range over the one-off bonus, promotion, an assured salary and a housing allowance or even a free apartment to attract Chinese professors who work abroad and those foreign professors. This encouragement brings surprising results in boosting the overall academic achievements among universities. However, since Chinese universities notoriously rank low on World University Rankings, there is still a long way to go including adjusting executive measures to cater to these talents. Fine porcelain, Chinese-landscape scrolls and calligraphy adom the office of Shi Yigong. Little about his ornamentation hints at Mr. Shi’s 18 years’ professorship at Princeton University in America as his native country started to prosper. In 2008, at the age of 41, he returned to his homeland only to become one of the most famous Chinese scholars to do so. Mr. Shi’s experience is an emblem of Chinese government’s attempts to match its academic achievements with its economic ones. To solve the brain drain problem, inviting offers have been made to attract the talented back to China. These baits range from a one-off bonus with a handsome sum to a housing allowance and even a free but swanky apartment. However, in addition to these comfortable materials, more importantly, some bureaucratic processes should give way to the real freedom which aims at bringing the best out of professors’ productive academic achievements. After all, in today’s market where science and technology play a leading role, we need not adorn our universities with professors with high reputations but barren researches. All in all, well-thumbed lexicon as the brain drain seems to be, effective measures must be taken to solve this problem. The real power of a nation roots deep in the elite think-tank where professors constitute the largest part. For the sake of our own development, let’s cherish these knowledge-ridden talents in the most effective way!
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/hybK777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheabilitytomovetofindnewworkhaslongbeenacornerstoneoftheAmericanDream.Thereisgrowingconcernthatbeingst
Fundingpublictransitisoneofthebiggestproblemsfacingcitiestoday.Oftenthetroubleisthatafewhigh-cost,low-rider
DuringtheColonialdays,theIroquoishadanagriculturaleconomybasingmainlyoncornwithsupplementarycropsofpumpkins,b
A、Fastfood.B、Nutrition.C、Universities.D、Sausages.A访谈开头,句(1)中女士便提到,这次节目邀请了圣地亚哥州立大学杰出的营养学家迈克.布朗来分享一些关于快餐的信息。因此答案为[A]。
A、OnlineeducationinChina.B、DigitalgapinChina.C、GoodcoursewareinChina.D、CredibleexamsinChina.A访谈一开始就谈到了网络教育的优缺点,然
A、Fragrance-free.B、ClimateChange.C、AnimalWelfare.D、IngredientSafety.B根据句(6)可知,如果你主要担心商品对这个星球的影响,你应该选择“气候变化”这一项。因此答案为[B]。
A、Sheisworkingincollege.B、Herstudyshowsworkoutisgoodforourbrains.C、Sheisabout45-50yearsold.D、Herresearchsu
A、Music.B、Sportgames.C、Interests.D、Socialchanges.A在访谈结束时,主持人说到,下一次节目我们会谈论美国的艺术、写作和建筑。A项的内容符合艺术范畴,故为答案。其他选项在此次节目中已被谈论。
区别于其他形式的校园暴力,霸凌行为通常并不会造成严重的一次性肢体伤害,但却往往会给受害人带来持久性隐形创伤。如果没有受到专业的心理引导,受害者有可能转变为报复社会的人,进而从受害者转变为施暴者,将自己的遭遇原封不动或放大百倍地转嫁到他人身上。美国相关机构的
由小学到中学,所修习的无非是一些普通的基本知识。就是大学四年,所授课业也还是相当粗浅的学识。世人常称大学为“最高学府”,这名称易滋误解,好像过此以上即无学问可言。大学的研究所才是初步研究学问的所在,在这里做学问也只能算是初涉藩篱,注重的是研究学问的方法与实
随机试题
男性,64岁,突发气喘、心慌2小时,高血压病史9年。检查:半卧位,血压200/120mmHg,心率126次/分,律不齐,双肺湿啰音,尿素氮24.2mmol/L,肌酐433μmol/L,血钾5.8mmol/L,诊断:高血压3级(很高危组),急性左心衰竭,肾功
正常肾动脉血管由肾门至肾皮质的分支顺序是
大量饮清水后,反射性地使抗利尿激素分泌减少,使水的重吸收减少,引起尿量增多的现象称为渗透性利尿。()
施工中发生不可抗力事件,承包人应迅速采取措施,并在不可抗力事件结束后( )小时内向工程师通报受灾情况和损失情况及预计清理和修复费用。
在设计和实施实质性分析程序时,注册会计师应当确定已记录金额与预期值之间不可接受的差异额。()
非正式群体是_____形成的。【】
下列做法中,没有违法的是()。
政府监管是市场经济条件下政府为实现某些公共政策目标,对微观经济主体进行的规范与制约,主要通过对特定产业和微观经济活动主体的进入、退出、资质、价格及涉及国民健康、生命安全、可持续发展等行为进行监督、管理来实现。根据上述定义,下列属于政府监管范围的是(
覆盖义齿(overdenture)
ImproveYourPublicSpeakingSkills1.Practiceina【T1】______environment【T1】______■Receivefeedbackabout
最新回复
(
0
)