首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
30
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/jAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheBritishEmpirewasoncehometothirdofthe【M1】________.world’spopulation.But,withtheretur
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
Ourtheoriesabouthumandiseasearetheproductofcurrentfashion【M1】______thanwewouldliketoadmit.Butjustasthe
Accordingtolegend,theancientOlympicGameswerefoundedbyHeracles,asonofZeus.YetthefirstOlympicGamesforwhich
Thenatureoflanguageisthenatureofhumanthoughtandhumanaction,forlanguageisnomorenorlessthanthetoolofboth
Largecompaniesneedawaytoreachthesavingsofthepublicatlarge.Therecanbefewprospectofraisingthesortofsumsne
Thiswasthecapital’smostanxiousweeksinceSeptember11th.OnMondaythegovernmentissuedaredalertthatterroristattac
TheGreekshaveasecondBattleof.Marathonontheirhands.TheiradversariesthistimearenotinvadingPersians,asin490B.
______isananti-slaverynoveland"helpedlaythegroundworkfortheCivilWar".
Inthe1990s,MicrosoftInternetExplorerbattledNetscapeNavigatorinthegreatWebbrowserwars.Inthe2000s,GoogleandYah
随机试题
设函数f(x)在(-∞,+∞)上可导,且f(x)=e-2+3,则fˊ(x)等于【】
患儿男,7岁。化脓性扁桃体炎症,外周血WBC为14×109/L。患者的白细胞计数反映
A、原位癌B、基层下疱C、棘层内疱D、粒层增生E、基底细胞液化良性黏膜类天疱疮是
对于复合层涂层防腐蚀施工,涂底漆前应对()等特殊部位加以保护。
下列属于重大不实告知的是( )。
设函数f(x)=x3一3x2,该函数的极大值为().
当前。有些地方抢劫杀人等恶性案件不断发生.卖淫、嫖娼、吸毒、赌博等社会丑恶现象屡禁不止。请问作为一名基层干警。应如何加强社会治安的综合治理?
邓小平提出一个国家,两种制度,“一国两制”的创造性构想,该政策以()为原则。
以下关于当前主干网络的叙述中,不正确的是:________。
•Readthearticlebelowaboutsuggestionsforeffectivemeetingsandthefollowingquestions.•Foreachquestion(13-18),marko
最新回复
(
0
)