首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came
admin
2015-06-14
28
问题
In the grand scheme of things Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are normally thought of as good guys. Between them, they came up with the ethical theory known as utilitarianism. The goal of this theory is encapsulated in Bentham’s aphorism that "the greatest happiness of the greatest number is the foundation of morals and legislation."
It all sounds fine and dandy until you start applying it to particular cases. A utilitarian, for example, might approve of the occasional torture of suspected terrorists—for the greater happiness of everyone else, you understand. That type of observation has led Daniel Bartels at Columbia University and David Pizarro at Cornell to ask what sort of people actually do have a utilitarian outlook on life. Their answers, just published in Cognition, are not comfortable.
One of the classic techniques used to measure a person’s willingness to behave in a utilitarian way is known as trolleyology.
The subject of the study is challenged with thought experiments involving a runaway railway trolley or train carriage. All involve choices, each of which leads to people’s deaths. For example: there are five railway workmen in the path of a runaway carriage. The men will surely be killed unless the subject of the experiment, a bystander in the story, does something. The subject is told he is on a bridge over the tracks. Next to him is a big, heavy stranger. The subject is informed that his own body would be too light to stop the train, but that if he pushes the stranger onto the tracks, the stranger’s large body will stop the train and save the five lives. That, unfortunately, would kill the stranger.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro knew from previous research that around 90% of people refuse the utilitarian act of killing one individual to save five. What no one had previously inquired about, though, was the nature of the remaining 10%.
To find out, the two researchers gave 208 undergraduates a battery of trolleyological tests and measured, on a four-point scale, how utilitarian their responses were. Participants were also asked to respond to a series of statements intended to get a sense of their individual psychologies. These statements included, "I like to see fist fights", "The best way to handle people is to tell them what they want to hear", and "When you really think about it, life is not worth the effort of getting up in the morning". Each was asked to indicate, for each statement, where his views lay on a continuum that had "strongly agree" at one end and "strongly disagree" at the other. These statements, and others like them, were designed to measure, respectively, psychopathy, Machiavellianism and a person’s sense of how meaningful life is.
Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro then correlated the results from the trolleyology with those from the personality tests. They found a strong link between utilitarian answers to moral dilemmas(push the fat guy off the bridge)and personalities that were psychopathic, Machiavellian or tended to view life as meaningless. Utilitarians, this suggests, may add to the sum of human happiness, but they are not very happy people themselves.
That does not make utilitarianism wrong. Crafting legislation—one of the main things that Bentham and Mill wanted to improve—inevitably involves riding roughshod over someone’s interests. Utilitarianism provides a plausible framework for deciding who should get trampled. The results obtained by Dr. Bartels and Dr. Pizarro do, though, raise questions about the type of people who you want making the laws. Psychopathic, Machiavellian misanthropes? Apparently, yes.
Which of the following statements is INCORRECT of the experiment?
选项
A、The subject entered a hypnotic state.
B、Similar experiments had been done before.
C、It found out something that is unknown to all.
D、Trolleyology is a technique to analyze utilitarianism.
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/jAOO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhichofthefollowingisTRUE?
Onemajorobstacletoeconomicdevelopmentispopulationgrowth.Thepopulationsofmostdevelopingcountriesgrewataratemuc
______,writtenin1854byCharlesDickens,isanearnestattackonthevulgarityandmaterialismoftherisingmiddleclassind
Vibrationsinthegroundareapoorlyunderstoodbutprobablywidespreadmeansofcommunicationbetweenanimals.Itseemsun
Nowomancanbetoorichortoothin.ThissayingoftenattributedwiththelateDuchessofWindsorembodiesmuchofthe【M1】____
A、GettingtheWHOworkB、LookingatthefiguresandstatisticsandthedevastationC、GettingtheleadersspeakingupD、Discussin
______deliveredhisworld-famousspeechGettysburgAddressduringtheCivilWar.
TheWorldBankfiguresshowsharppriceincreasesinwheat,maize,sugar,and【N1】______overthepastsixmonths,withpricesal
然而秋确有另一意味,没有春天的阳气勃勃、也没有夏天的炎烈迫人、也不像冬天之全人于枯槁凋零。我所爱的是秋林古气磅礴气象。有人以老气横秋骂人,可见是不懂得秋林古色之滋味。在四时中我于秋是有偏爱的,所以不妨说说。秋是代表成熟,对于春天之明媚娇艳,夏日之
随机试题
小红花了10分钟背会了《茅屋为秋风所破歌》这首诗,接着又继续读了5分钟。这种方法属于()。
常用药动学参数有
A.犬细小病毒B.犬瘟热病毒C.狂犬病病毒D.伪狂犬病病毒E.犬传染性肝炎病毒能致犬肠炎,具血凝性的单股DNA病毒是()
下列各项中,可以表明投资项目具有财务可行性的有()。
Whichvowelisdifferentfromtheothersaccordingtothecharacteristicsofvowels?
把两个及其两个以上年级的儿童编在一个班级,直接教学与布置、完成作业轮流交替进行,在一节课内由一位教师对不同年级学生进行教学的组织形式是()。
老万不愿承认,在那些时候,______。但是一个直观的事实是,那些大牌的画家抱成团,对于老万这些人,持的就是这种态度。直到现在,老万才真正成为异类,这样的态度才变成真正的反对。填入横线上最恰当的一项是()。
国家统计局公布的《2011年城乡居民收入增长情况》称,通过对全国31个省(自治区、直辖市)714万户农村居民家庭和6.6万户城镇居民家庭进行抽样调查,2011年全国农村居民人均纯收入6977元,比上年增加1058元,剔除价格因素影响,实际增长11.4%,增
已知其中k≠0,则
已知总体X的概率密度为设X1,X2,…,Xn为简单随机样本.判断这个估计量是否为θ的无偏估计量.
最新回复
(
0
)