首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page. •For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B,
admin
2010-01-28
44
问题
•Read the following article about merge and the questions on the opposite page.
•For each question 15-20, mark one letter (A, B, C or D ) on your Answer Sheet for the answer you choose.
A school of behavioral economists has long argued that when it comes to money, people are incapable of acting in their own best interest -- that decisions result from impulse and overconfidence as much as from reason. Smart folks, in other words, are just as likely to soon part with their money as all those fools.
The truly bad news is that smart companies are just as prone to make terrible decisions for the same reason. Take one of the biggest business decisions of all— merger. Research consistently shows that most mergers fail in every sense of the word, from falling stock prices to lower profitability after the merger. Yet, even with suffering capital markets, a recent Hewitt Associates study found that more than half of the 70 senior executives and board members surveyed planned to step up merger activity during the next three years.
Why? Call it executive hubris. CEOs are not different from the rest of us in that they fall prey to the self-enhancement bias: we all like to think we are intelligent and efficacious. So we overestimate our abilities. That’s why studies show that significantly more than half of all people believe they are above average -- in negotiating ability, even in income, This overly optimistic view is, of course, worse for CEOs- afar all, they generally are way above average. Btu the result is the same: bad decisions. One study, by business school professors Matthew Hayward and Donald Hambrick, showed that the greater the hubris of the chief executive, the more a company tends to overpay for acquisitions.
The aphorism "Pride goeth before a fall" seems to hold true in business too. When executives are confronted with the appalling statistics, their first response goes something like this: "That may happen to other companies, but not ours. This acquisition will be more successful. We have learned."
The next CEO challenge is persuading a possibly recalcitrant board of directors to let you pursue your urge to merge. Hubris, again, returns to center stage. You paint a picture of doom and gloom that will result if you don’t merge. Take a look at one of the rationales given for the merger of Hewlett-Packard and Compaq, two companies with poor operating track records. The argument was that PCs were becoming a commodity industry, consolidation was inevitable, and if HP didn’t do the consolidating, it would soon be one of the consolidated. Here’s another variant of the same rationale: If you don’t buy the target company, your competitor will -- and you’ll lose out. This gambit uses the influence strategy of scarcity -- we want what we can’t have, and we find particularly desirable anything that we may lose to someone else.
Here’s how to avoid hubris-fueled merger mania. First, follow the adage from medicine: Forgive and remember. Go back and evaluate past merger decisions, admit when you were wrong, figure out why, and learn from it.
Second, beware of too much agreement in the board room. When Alfred Sloan ran General Motors, if he couldn’t find opposition to a decision, he’d postpone it. He interpreted a lack of dissent as a lack of analysis. Find, even encourage, people to disagree with you, so that all sides of the decision are examined. Mostly, we like those who agree with us. But as one of my colleagues likes to point out, if two people agree all the time, one of them is redundant.
The urge to merge is still like an addiction in many companies: Doing deals is much more fun and interesting than fixing fundamental problems. So, as in dealing with any other addiction or temptation, maybe it is best to just say no.
What is said about CEOs in the third paragraph?
选项
A、They are above the average people in intelligence.
B、They look down upon the ordinary people.
C、They are overly confident about their abilities as the others are.
D、They can do more mergers with their greater hubris.
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/jCKd777K
本试题收录于:
BEC高级阅读题库BEC商务英语分类
0
BEC高级阅读
BEC商务英语
相关试题推荐
A、 B、 C、 CThesubwayanswerswhatisthefastestwaytogetdowntown.Choice(A)confusestheoppositesslowand
A、 B、 C、 ATakethenumber14busadvisesthequestionercorrectly.Choice(B)usesthepasttense.Choice(C)confus
A、 B、 C、 ANo,...inahospitalanswerstheyes/noquestion.Choice(B)confusesthesimilarsoundsbarnandbor
A、 B、 C、 AHowaboutthefrontrowoffersasuggestionofwheretosit.Choice(B)answersthequestionwhen,not
A、 B、 C、 A因为是由Do开头的疑问句,所以答案就要以Yes/No开头。所以正确答案是(A)。在把article错误地理解成“物品”而不是“文章”时,容易误将(B)和(C)当做答案。
Askingquestions询问
Question询问
Tellingyouraudiencethattheycanaskquestions请听众提问
随机试题
1872年日本颁布了近代第一个教育改革法令《___________》,规定了日本教育领导体制和学校制度。
A、architectB、biochemistryC、butcherD、acheC选项C画线字母读[t∫],其他选项画线字母读[k]。
患儿,女性,8岁,发热。体检咽部红肿,有颈强直,有脑膜刺激症状,腰穿有脓性脑脊液,但未培养出脑膜炎双球菌。临床诊断为脑膜炎,请问下列哪种细菌还能引起本病
患者吴某,男,41岁。立冬时节突然昏仆,牙关紧闭。患者四肢厥冷,面赤唇紫,或鼻衄,舌质暗红,脉弦有力。以下诊断错误的是
A.清热利湿B.温中化湿C.化瘀消积D.泻火解毒E.凉血解毒
下列各项中,()不符合公文的行文规则。
①这些柳树就是大名鼎鼎的“左公柳”——左宗棠平阿古柏后沿途栽下的柳树。可是当年“遍栽杨柳三千里”,能活到今天的,就只有这些了②它就会成为一棵大树。这样的大树会引起人们特殊的敬意③它们身上都有编号挂牌,就像勋章一样,代表着特殊的荣誉④一棵树在漫长的成长
Thefollowingparagraphsaregiveninawrongorder.ForQuestions41-45,youarerequiredtoreorganizetheseparagraphsintoa
ThingstobeTaughtinEverySchoolI.Introduction:Importanceofstudents’abilitytodealwiththerealworld.A.Speaker’so
OnSaturday,BexarCountyDigitalLibrary—a$2.4million,4,000-square-footspacelocatedonthesouthsideofSanAntonio—opens
最新回复
(
0
)