首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And
admin
2019-09-23
35
问题
There is something intrinsically fascinating about the idea of evolution. What principles govern the evolution of a species? And what does evolution tell us about the place of Homosapiens in the grand order of things? The writer George Bernard Shaw held that a mystical guiding force impels life to evolve toward eventual perfection. Modern scientists may not believe in this guiding force or in the possibility of perfection, but many would agree that life has been improving itself through evolution for billions of years. (Note that this conveniently makes Homosapiens, a very recent product of evolution, one of the newest and most improved versions of life.) In the view of these scientists, constant competition among species is the engine that drives the process of evolution and people’s life upward.
To Darwin, nature was a surface covered with thousands of sharp
wedges
, all packed together and jostling for the same space. Those wedges that fared best moved toward the center of the surface, improving their position by knocking other wedges away with violent blows. The standard example that textbooks give of such competitive wedging is the interaction between the brachiopods and the clams.
Clams
were long held to be ancient undersea competitors of
brachiopods
due to the fact that the two species inhabited the same ecological niche. Clams are abundant today, whereas brachiopods (dominant in ancient times) are not. Modern clams are also physiologically more complex than brachiopods are. The standard interpretation of these facts is that the clams’ physiology was an evolutionary improvement that gave them the ability to "knock away" the brachiopods.
In recent years, however, the prominent naturalists Stephen Jay Gould and C. Brad Calloway have challenged the validity of this example as well as the model it was meant to support. Gould and Calloway found that over most geological time clams and brachiopods went their separate ways. Never did the population of brachiopods dip as that of the clams rose, or vice versa. In fact, the two populations often grew simultaneously, which belies the notion that they were fighting fiercely over the same narrow turf and resources. That there are so many more clams than brachiopods today seems rather to be a consequence of mass deaths that occurred in the Permian period. Whatever caused the mass deaths — some scientists theorize that either there were massive ecological or geological changes, or a
comet
crashed down from the heavens — clams were simply able to weather the storm much better than brachiopods.
Out of these observations, Gould and Calloway drew a number of far-reaching conclusions. For instance, they suggested that direct competition between species was far less frequent than Darwin thought. Perhaps nature was really a very large surface on which there were very few wedges, and the wedges consequently did not bang incessantly against each other. Perhaps the problem facing these wedges was rather that the surface continually altered its shape, and they had to struggle independently to stay in a good position on the surface as it changed.
So where does that leave Homosapiens if evolution is a response to sudden, unpredictable and sweeping changes in the environment rather than the result of a perpetual struggle? No longer are we the kings of the mountain who clawed our way to the top by advancing beyond other species. We are instead those who looked to the mountains when floods began to rage below and then discovered that living high up has its definite advantages, so long as our mountain doesn’t decide to turn into a volcano.
With regard to Gould and Calloway’s theory of evolution, the author would most likely state that it______.
选项
A、has not yet been tested as much as the previous model
B、rules out the possibility that one species could cause the extinction of another
C、puts the status of humans in a new perspective
D、attaches less importance to the effect of natural disasters
答案
C
解析
推断题。本题是推断作者对古尔德和卡洛韦的进化论的看法,本文首段就在探讨进化的观点决定着人类在整个进化过程中所处的位置,提出一部分科学家认为竞争理论是人类进化得以愈发完美的动力,但是后文中出现的古尔德和卡洛韦的理论则对这种观点提出质疑。由此可见他们的进化论是从一个新的视角来审视人类的地位,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/ktMO777K
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
A、Torememberpeople’sface.B、Torememberpeople’shairstyle.C、Torememberpeople’swayofwalking.D、Torememberpeople’sdre
A、learningplaysanimportantpartinmostaspectsofachild’sdevelopmentandchangeB、therearehardlyanyprinciplesoflear
WhichofthefollowingisTRUEaboutthegeneralmanagerandhisassistants?
EnvironmentalImpactsofMassTourismVocabularyandExpressionstrivializecontaminationfloraandfaunaaestheti
HackersAttackUSStateDepartmentComputersTheU.S.StateDepartmenthascloseditspublicemailsystemandwebsitesafter
Whatisthemainfindingofthestudy?
Somepeopleareagainstthegovernment’sdependenceonnewtechnologies.
Overthepast50years,technologyhaschangedthefishingindustrydramatically.Today,theromantic,ruggedindividualfisherm
AlthoughNewZealandwasthefirstcountryintheworldwherewomengotthevotein1893,itremainsasexistsocietyinwhichm
随机试题
测绘导轨直线度误差曲线图时,测量中依次移动水平仪垫铁,根据测量值,即可绘出曲线图。()
改良Widman术的适应症是
患者,男,45岁。头痛半年,CT检查如下图。进一步检查,最佳的检查方法是
患者,男,30岁。餐后突发右上腹及剑突下痛,放射到右肩及后背部,2小时后疼痛剧烈,伴恶心,并吐出所进食物,仍不缓解,急诊就医。患者有数年胃病史及胆石症历史,间有胆绞痛发作。体格检查:痛苦病容;T37℃,R28次/分,浅快,律齐;全腹胀,上腹肌紧张,压痛反跳
社会主义法与社会主义道德的共同点是什么?
道路改造工程中,常采用土工织物铺在新铺沥青混凝土底部,以减少沥青路面的反射裂缝,按要求土工织物应能耐()℃以上的高温。
教育所能带来的较高社会收益不包括()。
关于信息技术一般控制、应用控制与公司层面控制三者之间的关系,下列说法中正确的有()。
Itisreportedthataspacestation______onthemooninyearstocome.
Themostinterestingarchitecturalphenomenonofthe1970swastheenthusiasmforrefurbishingoldbuildings.Obviously,thiswa
最新回复
(
0
)