首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s
admin
2014-12-11
65
问题
When I was a graduate student in biochemistry at Tufts University School of Medicine, I read an abridged version of Montaigne’s Essays. My friend Margaret Rea and I spent hours wandering around Boston discussing the meaning and implications of the essays. Michel de Montaigne lived in the 16th century near Bordeaux, France. He did his writing in the southwest tower of his chateau, where he surrounded himself with a library of more than 1,000 books, a remarkable collection for that time. Montaigne posed the question, "What do I know?" By extension, he asks us all: Why do you believe what you think you know? My latest attempt to answer Montaigne can be found in Everyday Practice of Science: Where Intuition and Passion Meet Objectivity and Logic, originally published in January 2009 and soon to be out in paperback from the Oxford University Press.
Scientists tend to be glib about answering Montaigne’s question. After all, the success of technology testifies to the truth of our work. But the situation is more complicated.
In the idealized version of how science is done, facts about the world are waiting to be observed and collected by objective researchers who use the scientific method to carry out their work. But in the everyday practice of science, discovery frequently follows an ambiguous and complicated route. We aim to be objective, but we cannot escape the context of our unique life experiences. Prior knowledge and interests influence what we experience, what we think our experiences mean, and the subsequent actions we take. Opportunities for misinterpretation, error, and self-deception abound.
Consequently, discovery claims should be thought of as protoscience. Similar to newly staked mining claims, they are full of potential. But it takes communal scrutiny and acceptance to transform a discovery claim into a mature discovery. This is the credibility process, through which the individual researcher’s me, here, now becomes the community’s anyone, anywhere, anytime. Objective knowledge is the goal, not the starting point.
Once a discovery claim becomes public, the discoverer receives intellectual credit. But, unlike with mining claims, the community takes control of what happens next. Within the complex social structure of the scientific community, researchers make discoveries; editors and reviewers act as gatekeepers by controlling the publication process; other scientists use the new finding to suit their own purposes; and finally, the public (including other scientists) receives the new discovery and possibly accompanying technology. As a discovery claim works its way through the community, a dialectic of interaction and confrontation between shared and competing beliefs about the science and the technology involved transforms an individual’s discovery claim into the community’s credible discovery.
Two paradoxes infuse this credibility process. First, scientific work tends to focus on some aspect of prevailing knowledge that is viewed as incomplete or incorrect. Little reward accompanies duplication and confirmation of what is already known and believed. The goal is new-search, not research. Not surprisingly, newly published discovery claims and credible discoveries that appear to be important and convincing will always be open to challenge and potential modification or refutation by future researchers. Second, novelty itself frequently provokes disbelief. Nobel Laureate and physiologist Albert Szent-Gyorgyi once described discovery as "seeing what everybody has seen and thinking what nobody has thought." But thinking what nobody else has thought and telling others what they have missed may not change their views. Sometimes years are required for truly novel discovery claims to be accepted and appreciated.
In the end, credibility "happens" to a discovery claim — a process that corresponds to what philosopher Annette Baier has described as the commons of the mind. "We reason together, challenge, revise, and complete each other’s reasoning and each other’s conceptions of reason," she wrote in a book with that title. In the case of science, it is the commons of the mind where we find the answer to Montaigne’s question: Why do you believe what you think you know?
Albert Szent-Gyorgyi would most likely agree that
选项
A、scientific claims will survive challenges.
B、discoveries today inspire future research.
C、efforts to make discoveries are justified.
D、scientific work calls for a critical mind.
答案
D
解析
观点态度题。由题干中的人名Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi将答案出处定位到第六段倒数第三句。该句提到Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi曾把发现描述为“见他人所见,想他人所未想”。结合后面提到的“但是思考没人想过的事情,再告诉别人他们漏掉了什么…”可知,Albert Szent-Gy6rgyi的言外之意就是科学工作需要敢于挑战已有的发现,需要有批判的精神,故答案为[D]。[A]和[B]是第一个悖论中涉及的观点,故排除。[C]与该段讲述内容无关,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://kaotiyun.com/show/lDdO777K
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
SchoolIsOutTooManyUsKidsFallTo"self-care"Thekidsarehangingout.Ipasssmallbandsofstudents,onmywaytowo
TheGoldenYearsRuleOnekeytoahappyretirementisthemeanstoenjoyit.RogerdeHaanendedupwithmorethanenoughm
Insideagradstudent’sapartmentattheUniversityofPennsylvaniasitsaslightlyfadedblue-and-whitewoodensignfromapost
SomestudentsatXUniversitygetprofessionalstocleantheirdorms,whichhasarousedwideconcerninoursociety.Isthisag
ThefollowingpeoplemetMexicanPresidentEXCEPT
AccordingtoDr.Adams,whatshouldwehaveasanattainablegoaloflanguagelearning?
AccordingtoDr.Adams,whatshouldwehaveasanattainablegoaloflanguagelearning?
TheoriesofHistoryI.Howmuchweknowabouthistory?A.Writtenrecordsexistforonlyafractionofman’stimeB.Theaccurac
______,thesecondlargestcityinIreland,isknownas"theRebelCounty".
Becausehumananatomydoesnotchange(exceptoverlongperiodsoftime),knowledgeacquiredacenturyagowasstillaccurateto
随机试题
根据《国家赔偿法》第17条的规定,除()情形外,国家不承担赔偿责任。
Examinationsdonot______astudenttoseekmoreknowledge.
诊断子宫内膜癌最可靠的方法是
药品流通监督管理办法的适用范围是
下列有关城市主干路机动车车道宽度的选择,哪项是错误的()
为保证燃气管网的安全与操作方便,地下燃气管道上的阀门一般都设置在()。
期货市场上套期保值规避风险的基本原理是()。
在群体和个人的决策中,以下关于决策过程的说法,错误的是()。
给定资料1.如今,微博、微信不再是传统舆论场的一个补充,它们的信息越来越具有首发性、独创性。以微博、微信和新闻客户端为主体的“两微一端”已成为微传播的主力军。新浪微博数据中心数据显示,截至2017年9月,微博月活跃人数共3.76亿,日活跃用户达到
期权交易同期货交易一样,买卖双方都需要交纳保证金。()
最新回复
(
0
)